Cargando…
A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584 |
_version_ | 1784569921077772288 |
---|---|
author | Papapetropoulos, Spyros Lee, Margaret S. Versavel, Stacey Newbold, Evan Jinnah, Hyder A. Pahwa, Rajesh Lyons, Kelly E. Elble, Rodger Ondo, William Zesiewicz, Theresa Hedera, Peter Handforth, Adrian Elder, Jenna Versavel, Mark |
author_facet | Papapetropoulos, Spyros Lee, Margaret S. Versavel, Stacey Newbold, Evan Jinnah, Hyder A. Pahwa, Rajesh Lyons, Kelly E. Elble, Rodger Ondo, William Zesiewicz, Theresa Hedera, Peter Handforth, Adrian Elder, Jenna Versavel, Mark |
author_sort | Papapetropoulos, Spyros |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 to receive CX‐8998 (titrated to 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to day 28 in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale scored by independent blinded video raters. Secondary outcomes included in‐person blinded investigator rating of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale, The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living subscale, and Kinesia ONE accelerometry. RESULTS: The video‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale was not different for CX‐8998 (n = 39) versus placebo (n = 44; P = 0.696). CX‐8998 improved investigator‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale (P = 0.017) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living (P = 0.049) but not Kinesia ONE (P = 0.421). Adverse events with CX‐8998 included dizziness (21%), headache (8%), euphoric mood (6%), and insomnia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary efficacy end point was not met; however, CX‐8998 improved some assessments of essential tremor, supporting further clinical investigation. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8451783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84517832021-09-27 A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor Papapetropoulos, Spyros Lee, Margaret S. Versavel, Stacey Newbold, Evan Jinnah, Hyder A. Pahwa, Rajesh Lyons, Kelly E. Elble, Rodger Ondo, William Zesiewicz, Theresa Hedera, Peter Handforth, Adrian Elder, Jenna Versavel, Mark Mov Disord Regular Issue Articles BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 to receive CX‐8998 (titrated to 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to day 28 in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale scored by independent blinded video raters. Secondary outcomes included in‐person blinded investigator rating of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale, The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living subscale, and Kinesia ONE accelerometry. RESULTS: The video‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale was not different for CX‐8998 (n = 39) versus placebo (n = 44; P = 0.696). CX‐8998 improved investigator‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale (P = 0.017) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living (P = 0.049) but not Kinesia ONE (P = 0.421). Adverse events with CX‐8998 included dizziness (21%), headache (8%), euphoric mood (6%), and insomnia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary efficacy end point was not met; however, CX‐8998 improved some assessments of essential tremor, supporting further clinical investigation. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-25 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8451783/ /pubmed/33764619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Issue Articles Papapetropoulos, Spyros Lee, Margaret S. Versavel, Stacey Newbold, Evan Jinnah, Hyder A. Pahwa, Rajesh Lyons, Kelly E. Elble, Rodger Ondo, William Zesiewicz, Theresa Hedera, Peter Handforth, Adrian Elder, Jenna Versavel, Mark A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title | A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title_full | A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title_fullStr | A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title_short | A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor |
title_sort | phase 2 proof‐of‐concept, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of cx‐8998 in essential tremor |
topic | Regular Issue Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papapetropoulosspyros aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT leemargarets aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT versavelstacey aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT newboldevan aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT jinnahhydera aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT pahwarajesh aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT lyonskellye aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT elblerodger aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT ondowilliam aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT zesiewicztheresa aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT hederapeter aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT handforthadrian aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT elderjenna aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT versavelmark aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT papapetropoulosspyros phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT leemargarets phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT versavelstacey phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT newboldevan phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT jinnahhydera phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT pahwarajesh phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT lyonskellye phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT elblerodger phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT ondowilliam phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT zesiewicztheresa phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT hederapeter phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT handforthadrian phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT elderjenna phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor AT versavelmark phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor |