Cargando…

A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor

BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papapetropoulos, Spyros, Lee, Margaret S., Versavel, Stacey, Newbold, Evan, Jinnah, Hyder A., Pahwa, Rajesh, Lyons, Kelly E., Elble, Rodger, Ondo, William, Zesiewicz, Theresa, Hedera, Peter, Handforth, Adrian, Elder, Jenna, Versavel, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584
_version_ 1784569921077772288
author Papapetropoulos, Spyros
Lee, Margaret S.
Versavel, Stacey
Newbold, Evan
Jinnah, Hyder A.
Pahwa, Rajesh
Lyons, Kelly E.
Elble, Rodger
Ondo, William
Zesiewicz, Theresa
Hedera, Peter
Handforth, Adrian
Elder, Jenna
Versavel, Mark
author_facet Papapetropoulos, Spyros
Lee, Margaret S.
Versavel, Stacey
Newbold, Evan
Jinnah, Hyder A.
Pahwa, Rajesh
Lyons, Kelly E.
Elble, Rodger
Ondo, William
Zesiewicz, Theresa
Hedera, Peter
Handforth, Adrian
Elder, Jenna
Versavel, Mark
author_sort Papapetropoulos, Spyros
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 to receive CX‐8998 (titrated to 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to day 28 in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale scored by independent blinded video raters. Secondary outcomes included in‐person blinded investigator rating of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale, The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living subscale, and Kinesia ONE accelerometry. RESULTS: The video‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale was not different for CX‐8998 (n = 39) versus placebo (n = 44; P = 0.696). CX‐8998 improved investigator‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale (P = 0.017) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living (P = 0.049) but not Kinesia ONE (P = 0.421). Adverse events with CX‐8998 included dizziness (21%), headache (8%), euphoric mood (6%), and insomnia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary efficacy end point was not met; however, CX‐8998 improved some assessments of essential tremor, supporting further clinical investigation. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84517832021-09-27 A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor Papapetropoulos, Spyros Lee, Margaret S. Versavel, Stacey Newbold, Evan Jinnah, Hyder A. Pahwa, Rajesh Lyons, Kelly E. Elble, Rodger Ondo, William Zesiewicz, Theresa Hedera, Peter Handforth, Adrian Elder, Jenna Versavel, Mark Mov Disord Regular Issue Articles BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX‐8998, a selective T‐type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18–75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 to receive CX‐8998 (titrated to 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to day 28 in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale scored by independent blinded video raters. Secondary outcomes included in‐person blinded investigator rating of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale, The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living subscale, and Kinesia ONE accelerometry. RESULTS: The video‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale was not different for CX‐8998 (n = 39) versus placebo (n = 44; P = 0.696). CX‐8998 improved investigator‐rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale (P = 0.017) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living (P = 0.049) but not Kinesia ONE (P = 0.421). Adverse events with CX‐8998 included dizziness (21%), headache (8%), euphoric mood (6%), and insomnia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary efficacy end point was not met; however, CX‐8998 improved some assessments of essential tremor, supporting further clinical investigation. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-25 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8451783/ /pubmed/33764619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Issue Articles
Papapetropoulos, Spyros
Lee, Margaret S.
Versavel, Stacey
Newbold, Evan
Jinnah, Hyder A.
Pahwa, Rajesh
Lyons, Kelly E.
Elble, Rodger
Ondo, William
Zesiewicz, Theresa
Hedera, Peter
Handforth, Adrian
Elder, Jenna
Versavel, Mark
A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title_full A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title_fullStr A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title_full_unstemmed A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title_short A Phase 2 Proof‐of‐Concept, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of CX‐8998 in Essential Tremor
title_sort phase 2 proof‐of‐concept, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of cx‐8998 in essential tremor
topic Regular Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28584
work_keys_str_mv AT papapetropoulosspyros aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT leemargarets aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT versavelstacey aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT newboldevan aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT jinnahhydera aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT pahwarajesh aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT lyonskellye aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT elblerodger aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT ondowilliam aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT zesiewicztheresa aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT hederapeter aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT handforthadrian aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT elderjenna aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT versavelmark aphase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT papapetropoulosspyros phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT leemargarets phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT versavelstacey phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT newboldevan phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT jinnahhydera phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT pahwarajesh phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT lyonskellye phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT elblerodger phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT ondowilliam phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT zesiewicztheresa phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT hederapeter phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT handforthadrian phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT elderjenna phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor
AT versavelmark phase2proofofconceptrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialofcx8998inessentialtremor