Cargando…

The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial

AIMS: The aims of this study were to: (i) estimate the effectiveness of ultraviolet radiation (UV) and sulphuric acid‐based fertilizer (SA), at reducing levels of generic Escherichia coli in surface irrigation water and on produce and surface soil in open produce fields; and (ii) describe the popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauvais, W., Englishbey, A.K., Marconi, C.M., Cholula, U., Belias, A.M., Wemette, M., Usaga, J., Churey, J.J., Worobo, R.W., Enciso, J., Anciso, J.R., Nightingale, K., Ivanek, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33482030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15011
_version_ 1784569931470209024
author Beauvais, W.
Englishbey, A.K.
Marconi, C.M.
Cholula, U.
Belias, A.M.
Wemette, M.
Usaga, J.
Churey, J.J.
Worobo, R.W.
Enciso, J.
Anciso, J.R.
Nightingale, K.
Ivanek, R.
author_facet Beauvais, W.
Englishbey, A.K.
Marconi, C.M.
Cholula, U.
Belias, A.M.
Wemette, M.
Usaga, J.
Churey, J.J.
Worobo, R.W.
Enciso, J.
Anciso, J.R.
Nightingale, K.
Ivanek, R.
author_sort Beauvais, W.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aims of this study were to: (i) estimate the effectiveness of ultraviolet radiation (UV) and sulphuric acid‐based fertilizer (SA), at reducing levels of generic Escherichia coli in surface irrigation water and on produce and surface soil in open produce fields; and (ii) describe the population dynamics of generic E. coli in produce fields. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spinach and cantaloupe plots were randomly assigned to control, UV or SA treatment groups. Irrigation water was inoculated with Rifampicin‐resistant E. coli prior to treatment. More than 75% of UV‐ and SA‐treated tank water samples had counts below the detection limit, compared to a mean count of 3·3 Log(10) CFU per ml before treatment. Levels of Rifampicin‐resistant E. coli in soil and produce both increased and decreased over 10–15 days after irrigation, depending on the plot and time‐period. CONCLUSIONS: UV and SA treatments effectively reduce the levels of E. coli in surface irrigation water. Their effectiveness at reducing contamination on produce was dependent on environmental conditions. Applying wait‐times after irrigation and prior to harvest is not a reliable means of mitigating against contaminated produce. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results are of timely importance for the agricultural industry as new FSMA guidelines require producers to demonstrate a low microbial load in irrigation water or allow producers to apply a wait‐time to mitigate the risk of contaminated produce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84518192021-09-27 The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial Beauvais, W. Englishbey, A.K. Marconi, C.M. Cholula, U. Belias, A.M. Wemette, M. Usaga, J. Churey, J.J. Worobo, R.W. Enciso, J. Anciso, J.R. Nightingale, K. Ivanek, R. J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: The aims of this study were to: (i) estimate the effectiveness of ultraviolet radiation (UV) and sulphuric acid‐based fertilizer (SA), at reducing levels of generic Escherichia coli in surface irrigation water and on produce and surface soil in open produce fields; and (ii) describe the population dynamics of generic E. coli in produce fields. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spinach and cantaloupe plots were randomly assigned to control, UV or SA treatment groups. Irrigation water was inoculated with Rifampicin‐resistant E. coli prior to treatment. More than 75% of UV‐ and SA‐treated tank water samples had counts below the detection limit, compared to a mean count of 3·3 Log(10) CFU per ml before treatment. Levels of Rifampicin‐resistant E. coli in soil and produce both increased and decreased over 10–15 days after irrigation, depending on the plot and time‐period. CONCLUSIONS: UV and SA treatments effectively reduce the levels of E. coli in surface irrigation water. Their effectiveness at reducing contamination on produce was dependent on environmental conditions. Applying wait‐times after irrigation and prior to harvest is not a reliable means of mitigating against contaminated produce. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results are of timely importance for the agricultural industry as new FSMA guidelines require producers to demonstrate a low microbial load in irrigation water or allow producers to apply a wait‐time to mitigate the risk of contaminated produce. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-17 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8451819/ /pubmed/33482030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15011 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Beauvais, W.
Englishbey, A.K.
Marconi, C.M.
Cholula, U.
Belias, A.M.
Wemette, M.
Usaga, J.
Churey, J.J.
Worobo, R.W.
Enciso, J.
Anciso, J.R.
Nightingale, K.
Ivanek, R.
The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title_full The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title_short The effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic Escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
title_sort effectiveness of treating irrigation water using ultraviolet radiation or sulphuric acid fertilizer for reducing generic escherichia coli on fresh produce—a controlled intervention trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33482030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15011
work_keys_str_mv AT beauvaisw theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT englishbeyak theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT marconicm theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT cholulau theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT beliasam theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT wemettem theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT usagaj theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT chureyjj theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT woroborw theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT encisoj theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT ancisojr theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT nightingalek theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT ivanekr theeffectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT beauvaisw effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT englishbeyak effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT marconicm effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT cholulau effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT beliasam effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT wemettem effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT usagaj effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT chureyjj effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT woroborw effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT encisoj effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT ancisojr effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT nightingalek effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial
AT ivanekr effectivenessoftreatingirrigationwaterusingultravioletradiationorsulphuricacidfertilizerforreducinggenericescherichiacolionfreshproduceacontrolledinterventiontrial