Establishment and Validation of a Genetic Label Associated With M2 Macrophage Infiltration to Predict Survival in Patients With Colon Cancer and to Assist in Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality. Researchers have tried to interpret it from different perspectives and divided it into different subtypes to facilitate individualized treatment. With the rise in the use of immunotherapy, its value in the field of tumor has begun to emerge. From the perspective of immune infiltration, this study classified colon cancer according to the infiltration of M2 macrophages in patients with colon cancer and further explored the same. METHODS: Cibersort algorithm was used to analyze the level of immune cell infiltration in patients with colon cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), Consensus Clustering analysis, Lasso analysis, and univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis were used to screen and verify the hub genes associated with M2 macrophages. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to establish the M2 macrophage-related score (M2I Score). The correlation between M2I Score and somatic cell variation and microsatellite instability (MSI) were analyzed. Furthermore, the correlation between M2 macrophage score and differences in immunotherapy sensitivity was also explored. RESULTS: M2 macrophage infiltration was associated with poor prognosis. Four hub genes (ANKS4B, CTSD, TIMP1, and ZNF703) were identified as the progression-related genes associated with M2 macrophages. A stable and accurate M2I Score for M2 macrophages used in colon adenocarcinoma was determined based on four hub genes. The M2I Score was positively correlated with the tumor mutation load (TMB). The M2I Score of the group with high instability of microsatellites was higher than that of the group with low instability of microsatellites and microsatellite-stable group. Combined with the Cancer Immunome Atlas database, we concluded that patients with high M2I Scores were more sensitive to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. The low-rating group may have better efficacy without immune checkpoint inhibitors or with CTLA4 inhibitors alone. CONCLUSION: Four prognostic hub genes associated with M2 macrophages were screened to establish the M2I Score. Patients were divided into two subgroups: high M2I Score group and low M2I Score group. TMB, MSI, and sensitivity to immunotherapy were higher in the high-rated group. PD-1 inhibitors or PD-1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors are preferred for patients in the high-rated group who are more sensitive to immunotherapy.