Cargando…

Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation

Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Greggory, Bednarski, Samuel, Hall, Michael, Foster, Samuel W., Jin, SiJun, Davis, Joshua J., Xue, Wei, Constans, Eric, Grinias, James P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220
_version_ 1784570027620433920
author Murray, Greggory
Bednarski, Samuel
Hall, Michael
Foster, Samuel W.
Jin, SiJun
Davis, Joshua J.
Xue, Wei
Constans, Eric
Grinias, James P.
author_facet Murray, Greggory
Bednarski, Samuel
Hall, Michael
Foster, Samuel W.
Jin, SiJun
Davis, Joshua J.
Xue, Wei
Constans, Eric
Grinias, James P.
author_sort Murray, Greggory
collection PubMed
description Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared. The first system, a 3-axis design similar to many low-cost 3D printers that are available on the market, is constructed using an aluminum frame and stepper motors. The other system relies upon a series of 3D printed parts to achieve movement with a series of linker arms based on Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) design principles. Full printer design files, assembly instructions, software, and user directions are included for both samplers. The positioning precision of the 3-axis system is better than the SCARA mechanism due to finer motor control, albeit with a slightly higher cost of materials. Based on the improved precision of this approach, the 3-axis autosampler system was used to demonstrate the generation of a segmented flow droplet stream from adjacent wells within a 96-well plate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8452234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84522342021-10-01 Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation Murray, Greggory Bednarski, Samuel Hall, Michael Foster, Samuel W. Jin, SiJun Davis, Joshua J. Xue, Wei Constans, Eric Grinias, James P. HardwareX Article Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared. The first system, a 3-axis design similar to many low-cost 3D printers that are available on the market, is constructed using an aluminum frame and stepper motors. The other system relies upon a series of 3D printed parts to achieve movement with a series of linker arms based on Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) design principles. Full printer design files, assembly instructions, software, and user directions are included for both samplers. The positioning precision of the 3-axis system is better than the SCARA mechanism due to finer motor control, albeit with a slightly higher cost of materials. Based on the improved precision of this approach, the 3-axis autosampler system was used to demonstrate the generation of a segmented flow droplet stream from adjacent wells within a 96-well plate. Elsevier 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8452234/ /pubmed/34553104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Murray, Greggory
Bednarski, Samuel
Hall, Michael
Foster, Samuel W.
Jin, SiJun
Davis, Joshua J.
Xue, Wei
Constans, Eric
Grinias, James P.
Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title_full Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title_fullStr Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title_short Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
title_sort comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220
work_keys_str_mv AT murraygreggory comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT bednarskisamuel comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT hallmichael comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT fostersamuelw comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT jinsijun comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT davisjoshuaj comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT xuewei comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT constanseric comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation
AT griniasjamesp comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation