Cargando…
Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation
Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220 |
_version_ | 1784570027620433920 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Greggory Bednarski, Samuel Hall, Michael Foster, Samuel W. Jin, SiJun Davis, Joshua J. Xue, Wei Constans, Eric Grinias, James P. |
author_facet | Murray, Greggory Bednarski, Samuel Hall, Michael Foster, Samuel W. Jin, SiJun Davis, Joshua J. Xue, Wei Constans, Eric Grinias, James P. |
author_sort | Murray, Greggory |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared. The first system, a 3-axis design similar to many low-cost 3D printers that are available on the market, is constructed using an aluminum frame and stepper motors. The other system relies upon a series of 3D printed parts to achieve movement with a series of linker arms based on Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) design principles. Full printer design files, assembly instructions, software, and user directions are included for both samplers. The positioning precision of the 3-axis system is better than the SCARA mechanism due to finer motor control, albeit with a slightly higher cost of materials. Based on the improved precision of this approach, the 3-axis autosampler system was used to demonstrate the generation of a segmented flow droplet stream from adjacent wells within a 96-well plate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8452234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84522342021-10-01 Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation Murray, Greggory Bednarski, Samuel Hall, Michael Foster, Samuel W. Jin, SiJun Davis, Joshua J. Xue, Wei Constans, Eric Grinias, James P. HardwareX Article Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared. The first system, a 3-axis design similar to many low-cost 3D printers that are available on the market, is constructed using an aluminum frame and stepper motors. The other system relies upon a series of 3D printed parts to achieve movement with a series of linker arms based on Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) design principles. Full printer design files, assembly instructions, software, and user directions are included for both samplers. The positioning precision of the 3-axis system is better than the SCARA mechanism due to finer motor control, albeit with a slightly higher cost of materials. Based on the improved precision of this approach, the 3-axis autosampler system was used to demonstrate the generation of a segmented flow droplet stream from adjacent wells within a 96-well plate. Elsevier 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8452234/ /pubmed/34553104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Murray, Greggory Bednarski, Samuel Hall, Michael Foster, Samuel W. Jin, SiJun Davis, Joshua J. Xue, Wei Constans, Eric Grinias, James P. Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title | Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title_full | Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title_short | Comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
title_sort | comparison of design approaches for low-cost sampling mechanisms in open-source chemical instrumentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murraygreggory comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT bednarskisamuel comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT hallmichael comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT fostersamuelw comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT jinsijun comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT davisjoshuaj comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT xuewei comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT constanseric comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation AT griniasjamesp comparisonofdesignapproachesforlowcostsamplingmechanismsinopensourcechemicalinstrumentation |