Cargando…

Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria

BACKGROUND: Health system financing presents a challenge in many developing countries. We assessed two reform packages, performance-based financing (PBF) and direct facility financing (DFF), against each other and business-as-usual for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) provision in Nigeria. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanna, Madhulika, Loevinsohn, Benjamin, Pradhan, Elina, Fadeyibi, Opeyemi, McGee, Kevin, Odutolu, Oluwole, Fritsche, Gyorgy Bela, Meribole, Emmanuel, Vermeersch, Christel M. J., Kandpal, Eeshani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4
_version_ 1784570069412478976
author Khanna, Madhulika
Loevinsohn, Benjamin
Pradhan, Elina
Fadeyibi, Opeyemi
McGee, Kevin
Odutolu, Oluwole
Fritsche, Gyorgy Bela
Meribole, Emmanuel
Vermeersch, Christel M. J.
Kandpal, Eeshani
author_facet Khanna, Madhulika
Loevinsohn, Benjamin
Pradhan, Elina
Fadeyibi, Opeyemi
McGee, Kevin
Odutolu, Oluwole
Fritsche, Gyorgy Bela
Meribole, Emmanuel
Vermeersch, Christel M. J.
Kandpal, Eeshani
author_sort Khanna, Madhulika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health system financing presents a challenge in many developing countries. We assessed two reform packages, performance-based financing (PBF) and direct facility financing (DFF), against each other and business-as-usual for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) provision in Nigeria. METHODS: We sampled 571 facilities (269 in PBF; 302 in DFF) in 52 districts randomly assigned to PBF or DFF, and 215 facilities in 25 observable-matched control districts. PBF facilities received $2 ($1 for operating grants plus $1 for bonuses) for every $1 received by DFF facilities (operating grants alone). Both received autonomy, supervision, and enhanced community engagement, isolating the impact of additional performance-linked facility and health worker payments. Facilities and households with recent pregnancies in facility catchments were surveyed at baseline (2014) and endline (2017). Outcomes were Penta3 immunization, institutional deliveries, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), four-plus antenatal care (ANC) visits, insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) use by under-fives, and directly observed quality of care (QOC). We estimated difference-in-differences with state fixed effects and clustered standard errors. RESULTS: PBF increased institutional deliveries by 10% points over DFF and 7% over business-as-usual (p<0.01). PBF and DFF were more effective than business-as-usual for Penta3 (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively); PBF also for mCPR (p<0.05). Twenty-one of 26 QOC indicators improved in both PBF and DFF relative to business-as-usual (p<0.05). However, except for deliveries, PBF was as or less effective than DFF: Penta3 immunization and ITN use were each 6% less than DFF (p<0.1 for both) and QOC gains were also comparable. Utilization gains come from the middle of the rural wealth distribution (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that both PBF and DFF represent significant improvements over business-as-usual for service provision and quality of care. However, except for institutional delivery, PBF and DFF do not differ from each other despite PBF disbursing $2 for every dollar disbursed by DFF. These findings highlight the importance of direct facility financing and decentralization in improving PHC and suggest potential complementarities between the two approaches in strengthening MCH service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03890653; May 8, 2017. Retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8452448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84524482021-09-21 Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria Khanna, Madhulika Loevinsohn, Benjamin Pradhan, Elina Fadeyibi, Opeyemi McGee, Kevin Odutolu, Oluwole Fritsche, Gyorgy Bela Meribole, Emmanuel Vermeersch, Christel M. J. Kandpal, Eeshani BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Health system financing presents a challenge in many developing countries. We assessed two reform packages, performance-based financing (PBF) and direct facility financing (DFF), against each other and business-as-usual for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) provision in Nigeria. METHODS: We sampled 571 facilities (269 in PBF; 302 in DFF) in 52 districts randomly assigned to PBF or DFF, and 215 facilities in 25 observable-matched control districts. PBF facilities received $2 ($1 for operating grants plus $1 for bonuses) for every $1 received by DFF facilities (operating grants alone). Both received autonomy, supervision, and enhanced community engagement, isolating the impact of additional performance-linked facility and health worker payments. Facilities and households with recent pregnancies in facility catchments were surveyed at baseline (2014) and endline (2017). Outcomes were Penta3 immunization, institutional deliveries, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), four-plus antenatal care (ANC) visits, insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) use by under-fives, and directly observed quality of care (QOC). We estimated difference-in-differences with state fixed effects and clustered standard errors. RESULTS: PBF increased institutional deliveries by 10% points over DFF and 7% over business-as-usual (p<0.01). PBF and DFF were more effective than business-as-usual for Penta3 (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively); PBF also for mCPR (p<0.05). Twenty-one of 26 QOC indicators improved in both PBF and DFF relative to business-as-usual (p<0.05). However, except for deliveries, PBF was as or less effective than DFF: Penta3 immunization and ITN use were each 6% less than DFF (p<0.1 for both) and QOC gains were also comparable. Utilization gains come from the middle of the rural wealth distribution (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that both PBF and DFF represent significant improvements over business-as-usual for service provision and quality of care. However, except for institutional delivery, PBF and DFF do not differ from each other despite PBF disbursing $2 for every dollar disbursed by DFF. These findings highlight the importance of direct facility financing and decentralization in improving PHC and suggest potential complementarities between the two approaches in strengthening MCH service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03890653; May 8, 2017. Retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4. BioMed Central 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8452448/ /pubmed/34544415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khanna, Madhulika
Loevinsohn, Benjamin
Pradhan, Elina
Fadeyibi, Opeyemi
McGee, Kevin
Odutolu, Oluwole
Fritsche, Gyorgy Bela
Meribole, Emmanuel
Vermeersch, Christel M. J.
Kandpal, Eeshani
Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title_full Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title_fullStr Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title_short Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria
title_sort decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in nigeria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4
work_keys_str_mv AT khannamadhulika decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT loevinsohnbenjamin decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT pradhanelina decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT fadeyibiopeyemi decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT mcgeekevin decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT odutoluoluwole decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT fritschegyorgybela decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT meriboleemmanuel decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT vermeerschchristelmj decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria
AT kandpaleeshani decentralizedfacilityfinancingversusperformancebasedpaymentsinprimaryhealthcarealargescalerandomizedcontrolledtrialinnigeria