Cargando…

The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of obesity and the usefulness of a preoperative weight loss program (PWLP) for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR). METHODS: Study 1: 392 patients who underwent LCR for colorectal cancer were divided int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashihara, Hideya, Shimada, Mitsuo, Yoshikawa, Kozo, Higashijima, Jun, Tokunaga, Takuya, Nishi, Masaaki, Takasu, Chie, Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12455
_version_ 1784570075876950016
author Kashihara, Hideya
Shimada, Mitsuo
Yoshikawa, Kozo
Higashijima, Jun
Tokunaga, Takuya
Nishi, Masaaki
Takasu, Chie
Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
author_facet Kashihara, Hideya
Shimada, Mitsuo
Yoshikawa, Kozo
Higashijima, Jun
Tokunaga, Takuya
Nishi, Masaaki
Takasu, Chie
Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
author_sort Kashihara, Hideya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of obesity and the usefulness of a preoperative weight loss program (PWLP) for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR). METHODS: Study 1: 392 patients who underwent LCR for colorectal cancer were divided into two groups: those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m(2) (n = 113) and those with a BMI <25 kg/m(2) (n = 279). The influence of BMI on LCR was investigated. Study 2: Patients with a BMI ≥28 kg/m(2) who were scheduled to undergo LCR (n = 7, mean body weight 87.0 kg, mean BMI 33.9 kg/m(2)) undertook a PWLP including caloric restriction and exercise for 29.6 (15–70) days. The effects of this program were evaluated. RESULTS: Study 1: The BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) group had a prolongation of operation time and hospital stay than the BMI <25 kg/m(2) group. Study 2: The patients achieved a mean weight loss of 6.9% (−6.0 kg). The mean visceral fat area was significantly decreased by 18.0%, whereas the skeletal muscle mass was unaffected. The PWLP group had a significantly lower prevalence of postoperative complications compared with the BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) group. CONCLUSION: Obesity affected the surgical outcomes in LCR. A PWLP may be useful for obese patients undergoing LCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8452473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84524732021-09-27 The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection Kashihara, Hideya Shimada, Mitsuo Yoshikawa, Kozo Higashijima, Jun Tokunaga, Takuya Nishi, Masaaki Takasu, Chie Yoshimoto, Toshiaki Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of obesity and the usefulness of a preoperative weight loss program (PWLP) for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR). METHODS: Study 1: 392 patients who underwent LCR for colorectal cancer were divided into two groups: those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m(2) (n = 113) and those with a BMI <25 kg/m(2) (n = 279). The influence of BMI on LCR was investigated. Study 2: Patients with a BMI ≥28 kg/m(2) who were scheduled to undergo LCR (n = 7, mean body weight 87.0 kg, mean BMI 33.9 kg/m(2)) undertook a PWLP including caloric restriction and exercise for 29.6 (15–70) days. The effects of this program were evaluated. RESULTS: Study 1: The BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) group had a prolongation of operation time and hospital stay than the BMI <25 kg/m(2) group. Study 2: The patients achieved a mean weight loss of 6.9% (−6.0 kg). The mean visceral fat area was significantly decreased by 18.0%, whereas the skeletal muscle mass was unaffected. The PWLP group had a significantly lower prevalence of postoperative complications compared with the BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) group. CONCLUSION: Obesity affected the surgical outcomes in LCR. A PWLP may be useful for obese patients undergoing LCR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8452473/ /pubmed/34585052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12455 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kashihara, Hideya
Shimada, Mitsuo
Yoshikawa, Kozo
Higashijima, Jun
Tokunaga, Takuya
Nishi, Masaaki
Takasu, Chie
Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title_full The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title_fullStr The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title_full_unstemmed The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title_short The influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
title_sort influence and countermeasure of obesity in laparoscopic colorectal resection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12455
work_keys_str_mv AT kashiharahideya theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT shimadamitsuo theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT yoshikawakozo theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT higashijimajun theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT tokunagatakuya theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT nishimasaaki theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT takasuchie theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT yoshimototoshiaki theinfluenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT kashiharahideya influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT shimadamitsuo influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT yoshikawakozo influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT higashijimajun influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT tokunagatakuya influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT nishimasaaki influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT takasuchie influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection
AT yoshimototoshiaki influenceandcountermeasureofobesityinlaparoscopiccolorectalresection