Cargando…
Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study
OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this “hyper-hypo” p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3 |
_version_ | 1784570097201840128 |
---|---|
author | Strobel, D. Jung, E.-M. Ziesch, M. Praktiknjo, M. Link, A. Dietrich, C. F. Klinger, C. Schultheiß, M. Jesper, D. Schellhaas, B. |
author_facet | Strobel, D. Jung, E.-M. Ziesch, M. Praktiknjo, M. Link, A. Dietrich, C. F. Klinger, C. Schultheiß, M. Jesper, D. Schellhaas, B. |
author_sort | Strobel, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this “hyper-hypo” pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4–6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines (“hyper-hypo” pattern), based on the examiner’s subjective interpretation (“CEUS subjective”), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared. RESULTS: In total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The “hyper-hypo” pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. “CEUS subjective” showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and “CEUS subjective” (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the “hyper-hypo” pattern defined by current HCC guidelines. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4–6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8452566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84525662021-10-05 Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study Strobel, D. Jung, E.-M. Ziesch, M. Praktiknjo, M. Link, A. Dietrich, C. F. Klinger, C. Schultheiß, M. Jesper, D. Schellhaas, B. Eur Radiol Ultrasound OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this “hyper-hypo” pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4–6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines (“hyper-hypo” pattern), based on the examiner’s subjective interpretation (“CEUS subjective”), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared. RESULTS: In total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The “hyper-hypo” pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. “CEUS subjective” showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and “CEUS subjective” (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the “hyper-hypo” pattern defined by current HCC guidelines. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4–6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8452566/ /pubmed/33855588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Ultrasound Strobel, D. Jung, E.-M. Ziesch, M. Praktiknjo, M. Link, A. Dietrich, C. F. Klinger, C. Schultheiß, M. Jesper, D. Schellhaas, B. Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title | Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title_full | Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title_short | Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
title_sort | real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ceus) and ceus algorithms (ceus li-rads®/esculap) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study |
topic | Ultrasound |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strobeld reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT jungem reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT zieschm reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT praktiknjom reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT linka reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT dietrichcf reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT klingerc reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT schultheißm reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT jesperd reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT schellhaasb reallifeassessmentofstandardizedcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusandceusalgorithmsceusliradsesculapinhepaticnodulesincirrhoticpatientsaprospectivemulticenterstudy |