Cargando…

The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT

OBJECTIVES: Routine dosimetry calculations do not account for the presence of iodine in organs and tissues during CT acquisition. This study aims to investigate the impact of contrast agent (CA) on radiation dose. METHODS: First, relation between absorbed radiation dose and iodine concentrations was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazloumi, Mahta, Van Gompel, Gert, Kersemans, Veerle, de Mey, Johan, Buls, Nico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07763-7
_version_ 1784570100648509440
author Mazloumi, Mahta
Van Gompel, Gert
Kersemans, Veerle
de Mey, Johan
Buls, Nico
author_facet Mazloumi, Mahta
Van Gompel, Gert
Kersemans, Veerle
de Mey, Johan
Buls, Nico
author_sort Mazloumi, Mahta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Routine dosimetry calculations do not account for the presence of iodine in organs and tissues during CT acquisition. This study aims to investigate the impact of contrast agent (CA) on radiation dose. METHODS: First, relation between absorbed radiation dose and iodine concentrations was investigated using a cylindrical water phantom with iodine-saline dilution insertions. Subsequently, a retrospective study on abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) patient data was performed to assess the increase of the local absorbed radiation dose compared to a non-contrast scan. Absorbed doses were estimated with Monte Carlo simulations using the individual CT voxel data of phantom and patients. Further, organ segmentations were performed to obtain the dose in liver, liver parenchyma, left kidney, right kidney, aorta, and spleen. RESULTS: In the phantom study, a linear relation was observed between the radiation dose normalized by computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and CA concentrations I(conc) (mg/ml) for three tube voltages; [Formula: see text] = 0.14 × I(conc) + 1.02, [Formula: see text] = 0.16 × I(conc) + 1.21, [Formula: see text] = 0.16 × I(conc) + 1.24, and for DECT acquisition; [Formula: see text] = 0.15 × I(conc) + 1.09. Similarly, a linear relation was observed between the dose increase and the organ iodine contents (R(2) = 0.86 and p(value) < 0.01) in the patient study. The relative doses increased in the liver (21 ± 5%), liver parenchyma (20 ± 5%), right kidney (37 ± 7%), left kidney (39 ± 7%), aorta (34 ± 6%) and spleen (26 ± 4%). In addition, the local dose distributions changed based on patient’s anatomy and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a non-contrast scan, the organ doses increase by 30% in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. This study suggests considering CA in dosimetry calculations, epidemiological studies, and organ dose estimations while developing new CT protocols. KEY POINTS: • The presence of contrast media increases radiation absorption in CT, and this increase is related to the iodine content in the organs. • The increased radiation absorption due to contrast media can lead to an average 30% increase in absorbed organ dose. • Iodine should be considered in CT radiation safety studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8452580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84525802021-10-05 The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT Mazloumi, Mahta Van Gompel, Gert Kersemans, Veerle de Mey, Johan Buls, Nico Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: Routine dosimetry calculations do not account for the presence of iodine in organs and tissues during CT acquisition. This study aims to investigate the impact of contrast agent (CA) on radiation dose. METHODS: First, relation between absorbed radiation dose and iodine concentrations was investigated using a cylindrical water phantom with iodine-saline dilution insertions. Subsequently, a retrospective study on abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) patient data was performed to assess the increase of the local absorbed radiation dose compared to a non-contrast scan. Absorbed doses were estimated with Monte Carlo simulations using the individual CT voxel data of phantom and patients. Further, organ segmentations were performed to obtain the dose in liver, liver parenchyma, left kidney, right kidney, aorta, and spleen. RESULTS: In the phantom study, a linear relation was observed between the radiation dose normalized by computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and CA concentrations I(conc) (mg/ml) for three tube voltages; [Formula: see text] = 0.14 × I(conc) + 1.02, [Formula: see text] = 0.16 × I(conc) + 1.21, [Formula: see text] = 0.16 × I(conc) + 1.24, and for DECT acquisition; [Formula: see text] = 0.15 × I(conc) + 1.09. Similarly, a linear relation was observed between the dose increase and the organ iodine contents (R(2) = 0.86 and p(value) < 0.01) in the patient study. The relative doses increased in the liver (21 ± 5%), liver parenchyma (20 ± 5%), right kidney (37 ± 7%), left kidney (39 ± 7%), aorta (34 ± 6%) and spleen (26 ± 4%). In addition, the local dose distributions changed based on patient’s anatomy and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a non-contrast scan, the organ doses increase by 30% in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. This study suggests considering CA in dosimetry calculations, epidemiological studies, and organ dose estimations while developing new CT protocols. KEY POINTS: • The presence of contrast media increases radiation absorption in CT, and this increase is related to the iodine content in the organs. • The increased radiation absorption due to contrast media can lead to an average 30% increase in absorbed organ dose. • Iodine should be considered in CT radiation safety studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8452580/ /pubmed/33783569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07763-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Mazloumi, Mahta
Van Gompel, Gert
Kersemans, Veerle
de Mey, Johan
Buls, Nico
The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title_full The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title_fullStr The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title_full_unstemmed The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title_short The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT
title_sort presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced ct
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07763-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mazloumimahta thepresenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT vangompelgert thepresenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT kersemansveerle thepresenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT demeyjohan thepresenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT bulsnico thepresenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT mazloumimahta presenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT vangompelgert presenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT kersemansveerle presenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT demeyjohan presenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct
AT bulsnico presenceofcontrastagentincreasesorganradiationdoseincontrastenhancedct