Cargando…

Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs

Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carstens, Henning, Kalka, Katharina, Verhaegh, Rabea, Schumacher, Fabian, Soddemann, Matthias, Wilker, Barbara, Keitsch, Simone, Sehl, Carolin, Kleuser, Burkhard, Wahlers, Thorsten, Reiner, Gerald, Koch, Achim, Rauen, Ursula, Gulbins, Erich, Kamler, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3
_version_ 1784570109689331712
author Carstens, Henning
Kalka, Katharina
Verhaegh, Rabea
Schumacher, Fabian
Soddemann, Matthias
Wilker, Barbara
Keitsch, Simone
Sehl, Carolin
Kleuser, Burkhard
Wahlers, Thorsten
Reiner, Gerald
Koch, Achim
Rauen, Ursula
Gulbins, Erich
Kamler, Markus
author_facet Carstens, Henning
Kalka, Katharina
Verhaegh, Rabea
Schumacher, Fabian
Soddemann, Matthias
Wilker, Barbara
Keitsch, Simone
Sehl, Carolin
Kleuser, Burkhard
Wahlers, Thorsten
Reiner, Gerald
Koch, Achim
Rauen, Ursula
Gulbins, Erich
Kamler, Markus
author_sort Carstens, Henning
collection PubMed
description Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial cultures (46–89%) which leads to a donor-to-recipient transmission and after a higher risk of lung infection with reduced posttransplant outcome. We have previously shown that sphingosine very efficiently kills a variety of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis, Escherichia coli or Haemophilus influenzae. Thus, sphingosine could be a new treatment option with broadspectrum antiinfective potential, which may improve outcome after lung transplantation when administered prior to lung re-implantation. Here, we tested whether sphingosine has any adverse effects in the respiratory tract when applied into isolated ventilated and perfused lungs. A 4-h EVLP run using minipig lungs was performed. Functional parameters as well as perfusate measurements where obtained. Biopsies were obtained 30 min and 150 min after inhalation of sphingosine. Tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Hemalaun, TUNEL as well as stainings with Cy3-coupled anti-sphingosine or anti-ceramide antibodies were implemented. We demonstrate that tube-inhalation of sphingosine into ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs results in increased levels of sphingosine in the luminal membrane of bronchi and the trachea without morphological side effects up to very high doses of sphingosine. Sphingosine also did not affect functional lung performance. In summary, the inhalation of sphingosine results in an increase of sphingosine concentrations in the luminal plasma membrane of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8452622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84526222021-09-21 Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs Carstens, Henning Kalka, Katharina Verhaegh, Rabea Schumacher, Fabian Soddemann, Matthias Wilker, Barbara Keitsch, Simone Sehl, Carolin Kleuser, Burkhard Wahlers, Thorsten Reiner, Gerald Koch, Achim Rauen, Ursula Gulbins, Erich Kamler, Markus Sci Rep Article Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial cultures (46–89%) which leads to a donor-to-recipient transmission and after a higher risk of lung infection with reduced posttransplant outcome. We have previously shown that sphingosine very efficiently kills a variety of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis, Escherichia coli or Haemophilus influenzae. Thus, sphingosine could be a new treatment option with broadspectrum antiinfective potential, which may improve outcome after lung transplantation when administered prior to lung re-implantation. Here, we tested whether sphingosine has any adverse effects in the respiratory tract when applied into isolated ventilated and perfused lungs. A 4-h EVLP run using minipig lungs was performed. Functional parameters as well as perfusate measurements where obtained. Biopsies were obtained 30 min and 150 min after inhalation of sphingosine. Tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Hemalaun, TUNEL as well as stainings with Cy3-coupled anti-sphingosine or anti-ceramide antibodies were implemented. We demonstrate that tube-inhalation of sphingosine into ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs results in increased levels of sphingosine in the luminal membrane of bronchi and the trachea without morphological side effects up to very high doses of sphingosine. Sphingosine also did not affect functional lung performance. In summary, the inhalation of sphingosine results in an increase of sphingosine concentrations in the luminal plasma membrane of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8452622/ /pubmed/34545108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Carstens, Henning
Kalka, Katharina
Verhaegh, Rabea
Schumacher, Fabian
Soddemann, Matthias
Wilker, Barbara
Keitsch, Simone
Sehl, Carolin
Kleuser, Burkhard
Wahlers, Thorsten
Reiner, Gerald
Koch, Achim
Rauen, Ursula
Gulbins, Erich
Kamler, Markus
Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title_full Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title_fullStr Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title_full_unstemmed Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title_short Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
title_sort inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3
work_keys_str_mv AT carstenshenning inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT kalkakatharina inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT verhaeghrabea inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT schumacherfabian inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT soddemannmatthias inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT wilkerbarbara inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT keitschsimone inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT sehlcarolin inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT kleuserburkhard inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT wahlersthorsten inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT reinergerald inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT kochachim inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT rauenursula inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT gulbinserich inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs
AT kamlermarkus inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs