Cargando…
Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs
Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in br...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3 |
_version_ | 1784570109689331712 |
---|---|
author | Carstens, Henning Kalka, Katharina Verhaegh, Rabea Schumacher, Fabian Soddemann, Matthias Wilker, Barbara Keitsch, Simone Sehl, Carolin Kleuser, Burkhard Wahlers, Thorsten Reiner, Gerald Koch, Achim Rauen, Ursula Gulbins, Erich Kamler, Markus |
author_facet | Carstens, Henning Kalka, Katharina Verhaegh, Rabea Schumacher, Fabian Soddemann, Matthias Wilker, Barbara Keitsch, Simone Sehl, Carolin Kleuser, Burkhard Wahlers, Thorsten Reiner, Gerald Koch, Achim Rauen, Ursula Gulbins, Erich Kamler, Markus |
author_sort | Carstens, Henning |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial cultures (46–89%) which leads to a donor-to-recipient transmission and after a higher risk of lung infection with reduced posttransplant outcome. We have previously shown that sphingosine very efficiently kills a variety of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis, Escherichia coli or Haemophilus influenzae. Thus, sphingosine could be a new treatment option with broadspectrum antiinfective potential, which may improve outcome after lung transplantation when administered prior to lung re-implantation. Here, we tested whether sphingosine has any adverse effects in the respiratory tract when applied into isolated ventilated and perfused lungs. A 4-h EVLP run using minipig lungs was performed. Functional parameters as well as perfusate measurements where obtained. Biopsies were obtained 30 min and 150 min after inhalation of sphingosine. Tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Hemalaun, TUNEL as well as stainings with Cy3-coupled anti-sphingosine or anti-ceramide antibodies were implemented. We demonstrate that tube-inhalation of sphingosine into ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs results in increased levels of sphingosine in the luminal membrane of bronchi and the trachea without morphological side effects up to very high doses of sphingosine. Sphingosine also did not affect functional lung performance. In summary, the inhalation of sphingosine results in an increase of sphingosine concentrations in the luminal plasma membrane of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8452622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84526222021-09-21 Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs Carstens, Henning Kalka, Katharina Verhaegh, Rabea Schumacher, Fabian Soddemann, Matthias Wilker, Barbara Keitsch, Simone Sehl, Carolin Kleuser, Burkhard Wahlers, Thorsten Reiner, Gerald Koch, Achim Rauen, Ursula Gulbins, Erich Kamler, Markus Sci Rep Article Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial cultures (46–89%) which leads to a donor-to-recipient transmission and after a higher risk of lung infection with reduced posttransplant outcome. We have previously shown that sphingosine very efficiently kills a variety of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis, Escherichia coli or Haemophilus influenzae. Thus, sphingosine could be a new treatment option with broadspectrum antiinfective potential, which may improve outcome after lung transplantation when administered prior to lung re-implantation. Here, we tested whether sphingosine has any adverse effects in the respiratory tract when applied into isolated ventilated and perfused lungs. A 4-h EVLP run using minipig lungs was performed. Functional parameters as well as perfusate measurements where obtained. Biopsies were obtained 30 min and 150 min after inhalation of sphingosine. Tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Hemalaun, TUNEL as well as stainings with Cy3-coupled anti-sphingosine or anti-ceramide antibodies were implemented. We demonstrate that tube-inhalation of sphingosine into ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs results in increased levels of sphingosine in the luminal membrane of bronchi and the trachea without morphological side effects up to very high doses of sphingosine. Sphingosine also did not affect functional lung performance. In summary, the inhalation of sphingosine results in an increase of sphingosine concentrations in the luminal plasma membrane of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8452622/ /pubmed/34545108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Carstens, Henning Kalka, Katharina Verhaegh, Rabea Schumacher, Fabian Soddemann, Matthias Wilker, Barbara Keitsch, Simone Sehl, Carolin Kleuser, Burkhard Wahlers, Thorsten Reiner, Gerald Koch, Achim Rauen, Ursula Gulbins, Erich Kamler, Markus Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title | Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title_full | Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title_fullStr | Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title_short | Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
title_sort | inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97708-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carstenshenning inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT kalkakatharina inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT verhaeghrabea inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT schumacherfabian inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT soddemannmatthias inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT wilkerbarbara inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT keitschsimone inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT sehlcarolin inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT kleuserburkhard inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT wahlersthorsten inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT reinergerald inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT kochachim inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT rauenursula inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT gulbinserich inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs AT kamlermarkus inhaledsphingosinehasnoadversesideeffectsinisolatedventilatedandperfusedpiglungs |