Cargando…

Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice

Skeletal muscle anatomy and physiology are sexually dimorphic but molecular underpinnings and muscle‐specificity are not well‐established. Variances in metabolic health, fitness level, sedentary behavior, genetics, and age make it difficult to discern inherent sex effects in humans. Therefore, mice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Reilly, Juliana, Ono‐Moore, Kikumi D., Chintapalli, Sree V., Rutkowsky, Jennifer M., Tolentino, Todd, Lloyd, K. C. Kent, Olfert, I. Mark, Adams, Sean H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545692
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15031
_version_ 1784570244069588992
author O’Reilly, Juliana
Ono‐Moore, Kikumi D.
Chintapalli, Sree V.
Rutkowsky, Jennifer M.
Tolentino, Todd
Lloyd, K. C. Kent
Olfert, I. Mark
Adams, Sean H.
author_facet O’Reilly, Juliana
Ono‐Moore, Kikumi D.
Chintapalli, Sree V.
Rutkowsky, Jennifer M.
Tolentino, Todd
Lloyd, K. C. Kent
Olfert, I. Mark
Adams, Sean H.
author_sort O’Reilly, Juliana
collection PubMed
description Skeletal muscle anatomy and physiology are sexually dimorphic but molecular underpinnings and muscle‐specificity are not well‐established. Variances in metabolic health, fitness level, sedentary behavior, genetics, and age make it difficult to discern inherent sex effects in humans. Therefore, mice under well‐controlled conditions were used to determine female and male (n = 19/sex) skeletal muscle fiber type/size and capillarity in superficial and deep gastrocnemius (GA‐s, GA‐d), soleus (SOL), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and plantaris (PLT), and transcriptome patterns were also determined (GA, SOL). Summed muscle weight strongly correlated with lean body mass (r (2) = 0.67, p < 0.0001, both sexes). Other phenotypes were muscle‐specific: e.g., capillarity (higher density, male GA‐s), myofiber size (higher, male EDL), and fiber type (higher, lower type I and type II prevalences, respectively, in female SOL). There were broad differences in transcriptomics, with >6000 (GA) and >4000 (SOL) mRNAs differentially‐expressed by sex; only a minority of these were shared across GA and SOL. Pathway analyses revealed differences in ribosome biology, transcription, and RNA processing. Curation of sexually dimorphic muscle transcripts shared in GA and SOL, and literature datasets from mice and humans, identified 11 genes that we propose are canonical to innate sex differences in muscle: Xist, Kdm6a, Grb10, Oas2, Rps4x (higher, females) and Ddx3y, Kdm5d, Irx3, Wwp1, Aldh1a1, Cd24a (higher, males). These genes and those with the highest “sex‐biased” expression in our study do not contain estrogen‐response elements (exception, Greb1), but a subset are proposed to be regulated through androgen response elements. We hypothesize that innate muscle sexual dimorphism in mice and humans is triggered and then maintained by classic X inactivation (Xist, females) and Y activation (Ddx3y, males), with coincident engagement of X encoded (Kdm6a) and Y encoded (Kdm5d) demethylase epigenetic regulators that are complemented by modulation at some regions of the genome that respond to androgen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84532622021-09-27 Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice O’Reilly, Juliana Ono‐Moore, Kikumi D. Chintapalli, Sree V. Rutkowsky, Jennifer M. Tolentino, Todd Lloyd, K. C. Kent Olfert, I. Mark Adams, Sean H. Physiol Rep Original Articles Skeletal muscle anatomy and physiology are sexually dimorphic but molecular underpinnings and muscle‐specificity are not well‐established. Variances in metabolic health, fitness level, sedentary behavior, genetics, and age make it difficult to discern inherent sex effects in humans. Therefore, mice under well‐controlled conditions were used to determine female and male (n = 19/sex) skeletal muscle fiber type/size and capillarity in superficial and deep gastrocnemius (GA‐s, GA‐d), soleus (SOL), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and plantaris (PLT), and transcriptome patterns were also determined (GA, SOL). Summed muscle weight strongly correlated with lean body mass (r (2) = 0.67, p < 0.0001, both sexes). Other phenotypes were muscle‐specific: e.g., capillarity (higher density, male GA‐s), myofiber size (higher, male EDL), and fiber type (higher, lower type I and type II prevalences, respectively, in female SOL). There were broad differences in transcriptomics, with >6000 (GA) and >4000 (SOL) mRNAs differentially‐expressed by sex; only a minority of these were shared across GA and SOL. Pathway analyses revealed differences in ribosome biology, transcription, and RNA processing. Curation of sexually dimorphic muscle transcripts shared in GA and SOL, and literature datasets from mice and humans, identified 11 genes that we propose are canonical to innate sex differences in muscle: Xist, Kdm6a, Grb10, Oas2, Rps4x (higher, females) and Ddx3y, Kdm5d, Irx3, Wwp1, Aldh1a1, Cd24a (higher, males). These genes and those with the highest “sex‐biased” expression in our study do not contain estrogen‐response elements (exception, Greb1), but a subset are proposed to be regulated through androgen response elements. We hypothesize that innate muscle sexual dimorphism in mice and humans is triggered and then maintained by classic X inactivation (Xist, females) and Y activation (Ddx3y, males), with coincident engagement of X encoded (Kdm6a) and Y encoded (Kdm5d) demethylase epigenetic regulators that are complemented by modulation at some regions of the genome that respond to androgen. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8453262/ /pubmed/34545692 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15031 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
O’Reilly, Juliana
Ono‐Moore, Kikumi D.
Chintapalli, Sree V.
Rutkowsky, Jennifer M.
Tolentino, Todd
Lloyd, K. C. Kent
Olfert, I. Mark
Adams, Sean H.
Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title_full Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title_fullStr Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title_short Sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
title_sort sex differences in skeletal muscle revealed through fiber type, capillarity, and transcriptomics profiling in mice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545692
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15031
work_keys_str_mv AT oreillyjuliana sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT onomoorekikumid sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT chintapallisreev sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT rutkowskyjenniferm sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT tolentinotodd sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT lloydkckent sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT olfertimark sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice
AT adamsseanh sexdifferencesinskeletalmusclerevealedthroughfibertypecapillarityandtranscriptomicsprofilinginmice