Cargando…

Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury

OBJECTIVES: Chronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri‐implant bone formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 male Wistar rats were ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talebian, Reza, Kampleitner, Carina, Sagl, Benedikt, Kuchler, Ulrike, Dehpour, Ahmad Reza, Gruber, Reinhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13792
_version_ 1784570296316985344
author Talebian, Reza
Kampleitner, Carina
Sagl, Benedikt
Kuchler, Ulrike
Dehpour, Ahmad Reza
Gruber, Reinhard
author_facet Talebian, Reza
Kampleitner, Carina
Sagl, Benedikt
Kuchler, Ulrike
Dehpour, Ahmad Reza
Gruber, Reinhard
author_sort Talebian, Reza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Chronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri‐implant bone formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: one with the common bile duct ligated (BDL) and the respective sham‐treated control group (SHAM). After four weeks of disease induction, titanium mini‐screws were inserted into the tibia. Successful induction of liver cirrhosis was confirmed by the presence of clinical symptoms. Another four weeks later, peri‐implant bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were determined by histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: Peri‐implant bone formation was not significantly different between the SHAM and BDL groups. In the cortical compartment, the median percentage of peri‐implant new bone was 10.1% (95% CI of mean 4.0–35.7) and 22.5% (13.8–30.6) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .26). Consistently, the new bone in direct contact with the implant was 18.1% (0.4–37.8) and 23.3% (9.2–32.8) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .38). When measuring the medullary compartment, the new bone area was 7.1% (4.8–10.4) and 10.4% (7.2–13.5) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .17). Medullary new bone in direct contact with the implant was 10.0% (1.2–50.4) and 20.6% (16.8–35.3) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively, and thus comparable between the two groups (p = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Bile duct ligation has no significant impact on the early stages of peri‐implant bone formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84535422021-09-27 Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury Talebian, Reza Kampleitner, Carina Sagl, Benedikt Kuchler, Ulrike Dehpour, Ahmad Reza Gruber, Reinhard Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Chronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri‐implant bone formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: one with the common bile duct ligated (BDL) and the respective sham‐treated control group (SHAM). After four weeks of disease induction, titanium mini‐screws were inserted into the tibia. Successful induction of liver cirrhosis was confirmed by the presence of clinical symptoms. Another four weeks later, peri‐implant bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were determined by histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: Peri‐implant bone formation was not significantly different between the SHAM and BDL groups. In the cortical compartment, the median percentage of peri‐implant new bone was 10.1% (95% CI of mean 4.0–35.7) and 22.5% (13.8–30.6) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .26). Consistently, the new bone in direct contact with the implant was 18.1% (0.4–37.8) and 23.3% (9.2–32.8) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .38). When measuring the medullary compartment, the new bone area was 7.1% (4.8–10.4) and 10.4% (7.2–13.5) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .17). Medullary new bone in direct contact with the implant was 10.0% (1.2–50.4) and 20.6% (16.8–35.3) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively, and thus comparable between the two groups (p = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Bile duct ligation has no significant impact on the early stages of peri‐implant bone formation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8453542/ /pubmed/34114694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13792 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Talebian, Reza
Kampleitner, Carina
Sagl, Benedikt
Kuchler, Ulrike
Dehpour, Ahmad Reza
Gruber, Reinhard
Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title_full Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title_fullStr Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title_full_unstemmed Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title_short Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
title_sort bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation‐induced liver injury
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13792
work_keys_str_mv AT talebianreza bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury
AT kampleitnercarina bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury
AT saglbenedikt bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury
AT kuchlerulrike bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury
AT dehpourahmadreza bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury
AT gruberreinhard bonehealingaroundtitaniumimplantsinapreclinicalmodelofbileductligationinducedliverinjury