Cargando…

A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are known by the collective name venous thromboembolism. Deep vein thrombosis is the third most common cardiovascular disorder in the world. The disease is also prevalent in Africa including Ethiopia, besides lack of studies that show epidemiol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derseh, Manaye Tamrie, Solomon, Kiflom, Tamene, Wasihun, Beneberu, Wosenie, Yayehrad, Ashagrachew Tewabe, Ambaye, Abyou Seyfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557006
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S327868
_version_ 1784570312664285184
author Derseh, Manaye Tamrie
Solomon, Kiflom
Tamene, Wasihun
Beneberu, Wosenie
Yayehrad, Ashagrachew Tewabe
Ambaye, Abyou Seyfu
author_facet Derseh, Manaye Tamrie
Solomon, Kiflom
Tamene, Wasihun
Beneberu, Wosenie
Yayehrad, Ashagrachew Tewabe
Ambaye, Abyou Seyfu
author_sort Derseh, Manaye Tamrie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are known by the collective name venous thromboembolism. Deep vein thrombosis is the third most common cardiovascular disorder in the world. The disease is also prevalent in Africa including Ethiopia, besides lack of studies that show epidemiology of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin-based therapy for deep vein thrombosis patients in Ethiopia. METHODS: A Markov model was built to compare cost and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15mg bid for three weeks and 20mg per day for the rest to adjusted dose of warfarin for one year using a restricted societal perspective. The population in this analysis was a hypothetical cohort of deep vein thrombosis patients 40 years old with no contraindication, comorbidity and concomitant therapy. The patients were followed yearly for 24 years up to their average life expectancy. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban therapy resulted in higher quality adjusted life years with a value of 16.78, while warfarin-based treatment resulted in 16.34 quality adjusted life years. Total lifetime costs were $988.58 for rivaroxaban and $932.92 for unfractionated heparin/warfarin. Therefore, rivaroxaban resulted in a gain of 0.443 quality adjusted life years at an additional cost of $55.661. The incremental cost effectiveness ratios for rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was $125.683 per quality adjusted life year saved which is less than willingness to pay threshold of $783 per quality adjusted life year saved. Warfarin resulted in a net monetary benefit of $11,859.72, while that of rivaroxaban is $12,150.82, meaning rivaroxaban is cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses found that the model was sensitive to utility of no deep vein thrombosis, effectiveness of rivaroxaban and cost of rivaroxaban respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that rivaroxaban is a cost effective alternative and substituting rivaroxaban for warfarin is acceptable to willingness to pay threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84536462021-09-22 A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia Derseh, Manaye Tamrie Solomon, Kiflom Tamene, Wasihun Beneberu, Wosenie Yayehrad, Ashagrachew Tewabe Ambaye, Abyou Seyfu Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are known by the collective name venous thromboembolism. Deep vein thrombosis is the third most common cardiovascular disorder in the world. The disease is also prevalent in Africa including Ethiopia, besides lack of studies that show epidemiology of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin-based therapy for deep vein thrombosis patients in Ethiopia. METHODS: A Markov model was built to compare cost and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15mg bid for three weeks and 20mg per day for the rest to adjusted dose of warfarin for one year using a restricted societal perspective. The population in this analysis was a hypothetical cohort of deep vein thrombosis patients 40 years old with no contraindication, comorbidity and concomitant therapy. The patients were followed yearly for 24 years up to their average life expectancy. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban therapy resulted in higher quality adjusted life years with a value of 16.78, while warfarin-based treatment resulted in 16.34 quality adjusted life years. Total lifetime costs were $988.58 for rivaroxaban and $932.92 for unfractionated heparin/warfarin. Therefore, rivaroxaban resulted in a gain of 0.443 quality adjusted life years at an additional cost of $55.661. The incremental cost effectiveness ratios for rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was $125.683 per quality adjusted life year saved which is less than willingness to pay threshold of $783 per quality adjusted life year saved. Warfarin resulted in a net monetary benefit of $11,859.72, while that of rivaroxaban is $12,150.82, meaning rivaroxaban is cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses found that the model was sensitive to utility of no deep vein thrombosis, effectiveness of rivaroxaban and cost of rivaroxaban respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that rivaroxaban is a cost effective alternative and substituting rivaroxaban for warfarin is acceptable to willingness to pay threshold. Dove 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8453646/ /pubmed/34557006 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S327868 Text en © 2021 Derseh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Derseh, Manaye Tamrie
Solomon, Kiflom
Tamene, Wasihun
Beneberu, Wosenie
Yayehrad, Ashagrachew Tewabe
Ambaye, Abyou Seyfu
A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title_full A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title_fullStr A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title_short A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin for deep vein thrombosis (dvt) treatment in ethiopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557006
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S327868
work_keys_str_mv AT dersehmanayetamrie acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT solomonkiflom acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT tamenewasihun acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT beneberuwosenie acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT yayehradashagrachewtewabe acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT ambayeabyouseyfu acosteffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT dersehmanayetamrie costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT solomonkiflom costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT tamenewasihun costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT beneberuwosenie costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT yayehradashagrachewtewabe costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia
AT ambayeabyouseyfu costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabancomparedtowarfarinfordeepveinthrombosisdvttreatmentinethiopia