Cargando…

Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities

BACKGROUND: The lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic created major obstacles for individuals with disabilities to obtain support in their daily living. OBJECTIVES: This study was to examine the psychological and behavioral responses of US individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Na, Ling, Yang, Lixia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101216
_version_ 1784570346539581440
author Na, Ling
Yang, Lixia
author_facet Na, Ling
Yang, Lixia
author_sort Na, Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic created major obstacles for individuals with disabilities to obtain support in their daily living. OBJECTIVES: This study was to examine the psychological and behavioral responses of US individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities during the pandemic. METHODS: From a nationally representative longitudinal survey (n = 6403) administered during the pandemic, individuals were classified at baseline as having no mobility/self-care disability (ADL = 0, n = 4975), mobility or self-care disability (ADL = 1, n = 1061), and both mobility and self-care disabilities (ADL = 2, n = 367). Weighted mean of baseline mental distress scores (PHQ4), psychological risk factors (loneliness, stress, perceived COVID risk), resilience, and coping were compared among these groups. Random effects models were employed to assess the effects of disability and disability-moderated effects of risk factors on mental distress. RESULTS: At baseline, mental distress increased with greater ADL disabilities (Mean[95%CI] = 1.88[1.77, 1.98], 2.54[2.29, 2.79], and 3.55[3.01, 4.08] for ADL = 0, 1, and 2, respectively, p < .0001). Loneliness, stress, and perceived risk increased with ADL disabilities, but resilience and social coping decreased with it (p's < 0.0001). In the random-effects models, greater ADL disabilities, higher psychological risks, and use of cannabis and other recreational drugs were associated with greater mental distress. Greater ADL disabilities augmented the detrimental effects of risk factors on mental health, but resilience protected mental health both independently and through a buffering effect on its risk factors across all groups. CONCLUSION: Individuals with mobility and/or self-care disability tend to have poorer mental health and are differentially more affected by its risk factors. Mental health professionals should address these modifiable factors in interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84537862021-09-21 Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities Na, Ling Yang, Lixia Disabil Health J Original Article BACKGROUND: The lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic created major obstacles for individuals with disabilities to obtain support in their daily living. OBJECTIVES: This study was to examine the psychological and behavioral responses of US individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities during the pandemic. METHODS: From a nationally representative longitudinal survey (n = 6403) administered during the pandemic, individuals were classified at baseline as having no mobility/self-care disability (ADL = 0, n = 4975), mobility or self-care disability (ADL = 1, n = 1061), and both mobility and self-care disabilities (ADL = 2, n = 367). Weighted mean of baseline mental distress scores (PHQ4), psychological risk factors (loneliness, stress, perceived COVID risk), resilience, and coping were compared among these groups. Random effects models were employed to assess the effects of disability and disability-moderated effects of risk factors on mental distress. RESULTS: At baseline, mental distress increased with greater ADL disabilities (Mean[95%CI] = 1.88[1.77, 1.98], 2.54[2.29, 2.79], and 3.55[3.01, 4.08] for ADL = 0, 1, and 2, respectively, p < .0001). Loneliness, stress, and perceived risk increased with ADL disabilities, but resilience and social coping decreased with it (p's < 0.0001). In the random-effects models, greater ADL disabilities, higher psychological risks, and use of cannabis and other recreational drugs were associated with greater mental distress. Greater ADL disabilities augmented the detrimental effects of risk factors on mental health, but resilience protected mental health both independently and through a buffering effect on its risk factors across all groups. CONCLUSION: Individuals with mobility and/or self-care disability tend to have poorer mental health and are differentially more affected by its risk factors. Mental health professionals should address these modifiable factors in interventions. Elsevier Inc. 2022-01 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8453786/ /pubmed/34649808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101216 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Na, Ling
Yang, Lixia
Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title_full Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title_fullStr Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title_short Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
title_sort psychological and behavioral responses during the covid-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101216
work_keys_str_mv AT naling psychologicalandbehavioralresponsesduringthecovid19pandemicamongindividualswithmobilityandorselfcaredisabilities
AT yanglixia psychologicalandbehavioralresponsesduringthecovid19pandemicamongindividualswithmobilityandorselfcaredisabilities