Cargando…

CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC

INTRODUCTION: The basic science research endeavor has been abundantly and astonishingly successful in the last three decades in elucidating the mechanisms of neuro-oncologic disease and in suggesting therapeutic strategies. Clinical successes have lagged behind, and translation of promising laborato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Timothy, Mansouri, Alireza, Zammar, Samer, Glantz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453807/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab112.010
_version_ 1784570350438187008
author Brown, Timothy
Mansouri, Alireza
Zammar, Samer
Glantz, Michael
author_facet Brown, Timothy
Mansouri, Alireza
Zammar, Samer
Glantz, Michael
author_sort Brown, Timothy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The basic science research endeavor has been abundantly and astonishingly successful in the last three decades in elucidating the mechanisms of neuro-oncologic disease and in suggesting therapeutic strategies. Clinical successes have lagged behind, and translation of promising laboratory findings into clinical practice is rare. We hypothesize that one important reason for this discordance is the use of different paradigms for designing laboratory and clinical trials, and that utilizing clinically relevant procedures could improve laboratory study impact. METHODS: We identified all pre-clinical neuro-oncology therapeutic trials published in four high-impact journals between 11/2018 and 4/2019 and assigned a level of evidence (LOE) to each study using the American Academy of Neurology evidence classification system. We then identified all phase III trials of therapeutics for COVID and performed the same analysis on all preclinical studies preceding the trials. RESULTS: Of the 26 neuro-oncology articles identified, 85% had a LOE of IV and 15% were class III. An analysis of successful human trials showed significantly more high quality laboratory studies supporting “successful” compared to “unsuccessful” trials (p=0.048). This same pattern was identified in phase III trials of COVID. Twenty antiviral studies failed to meet the primary endpoint; all were preceded by class III or IV LOE preclinical studies. Eight evaluable phase three studies of COVID vaccines were identified, all of which met their primary endpoints. These were supported with a mix of Class I/II (n=4) and III/IV (n=4) preclinical studies. Higher LOE by AAN criteria is associated with successful COVID therapeutic trials (p=0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Despite rigorous, elegant, and enlightening laboratory experiments, successful translation to human therapeutics remains rare. Envisioning basic science research through the lens of clinical therapeutics represents a challenging but surmountable paradigm shift that may reverse this pattern and create a more successful research enterprise in neuro-oncology and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84538072021-09-22 CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC Brown, Timothy Mansouri, Alireza Zammar, Samer Glantz, Michael Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts INTRODUCTION: The basic science research endeavor has been abundantly and astonishingly successful in the last three decades in elucidating the mechanisms of neuro-oncologic disease and in suggesting therapeutic strategies. Clinical successes have lagged behind, and translation of promising laboratory findings into clinical practice is rare. We hypothesize that one important reason for this discordance is the use of different paradigms for designing laboratory and clinical trials, and that utilizing clinically relevant procedures could improve laboratory study impact. METHODS: We identified all pre-clinical neuro-oncology therapeutic trials published in four high-impact journals between 11/2018 and 4/2019 and assigned a level of evidence (LOE) to each study using the American Academy of Neurology evidence classification system. We then identified all phase III trials of therapeutics for COVID and performed the same analysis on all preclinical studies preceding the trials. RESULTS: Of the 26 neuro-oncology articles identified, 85% had a LOE of IV and 15% were class III. An analysis of successful human trials showed significantly more high quality laboratory studies supporting “successful” compared to “unsuccessful” trials (p=0.048). This same pattern was identified in phase III trials of COVID. Twenty antiviral studies failed to meet the primary endpoint; all were preceded by class III or IV LOE preclinical studies. Eight evaluable phase three studies of COVID vaccines were identified, all of which met their primary endpoints. These were supported with a mix of Class I/II (n=4) and III/IV (n=4) preclinical studies. Higher LOE by AAN criteria is associated with successful COVID therapeutic trials (p=0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Despite rigorous, elegant, and enlightening laboratory experiments, successful translation to human therapeutics remains rare. Envisioning basic science research through the lens of clinical therapeutics represents a challenging but surmountable paradigm shift that may reverse this pattern and create a more successful research enterprise in neuro-oncology and beyond. Oxford University Press 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8453807/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab112.010 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Brown, Timothy
Mansouri, Alireza
Zammar, Samer
Glantz, Michael
CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title_full CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title_fullStr CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title_full_unstemmed CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title_short CLRM-11. BENCH TO BEDSIDE NEURO-ONCOLOGY: ADVOCATING FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT STRATEGY AS UNDERSCORED BY THE PANDEMIC
title_sort clrm-11. bench to bedside neuro-oncology: advocating for a clinically relevant strategy as underscored by the pandemic
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453807/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab112.010
work_keys_str_mv AT browntimothy clrm11benchtobedsideneurooncologyadvocatingforaclinicallyrelevantstrategyasunderscoredbythepandemic
AT mansourialireza clrm11benchtobedsideneurooncologyadvocatingforaclinicallyrelevantstrategyasunderscoredbythepandemic
AT zammarsamer clrm11benchtobedsideneurooncologyadvocatingforaclinicallyrelevantstrategyasunderscoredbythepandemic
AT glantzmichael clrm11benchtobedsideneurooncologyadvocatingforaclinicallyrelevantstrategyasunderscoredbythepandemic