Cargando…

Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model

AIM: To determine the healing outcome following grafting with deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) with or without collagen membrane coverage in two‐wall (both buccal and lingual)‐damaged extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distal roots of three mandibular premolars in six beagle dogs we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tien, Hsu Kuo, Lee, Won‐Ho, Kim, Chang‐Sung, Choi, Seong‐Ho, Gruber, Reinhard, Lee, Jung‐Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13791
_version_ 1784570372321968128
author Tien, Hsu Kuo
Lee, Won‐Ho
Kim, Chang‐Sung
Choi, Seong‐Ho
Gruber, Reinhard
Lee, Jung‐Seok
author_facet Tien, Hsu Kuo
Lee, Won‐Ho
Kim, Chang‐Sung
Choi, Seong‐Ho
Gruber, Reinhard
Lee, Jung‐Seok
author_sort Tien, Hsu Kuo
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the healing outcome following grafting with deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) with or without collagen membrane coverage in two‐wall (both buccal and lingual)‐damaged extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distal roots of three mandibular premolars in six beagle dogs were extracted, and the whole buccal and lingual bony walls were surgically removed. Three treatment protocols were then applied according to the following group allocation: no graft (None), grafting DPBM (BG), and grafting DPBM with coverage by a collagen membrane (BG + M). Two observational periods (2 and 8 weeks) were used with the split‐mouth design, and quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed by microcomputed tomography and histology. RESULTS: The dimensions of the alveolar ridge at both grafted sites (BG and BG + M) remained similar to those of the pristine ridge in the histologic and radiographic analyses, whereas the ungrafted sites (None) collapsed both vertically and horizontally. Both grafting protocols produced substantial bony regeneration, but the addition of a covering membrane enhanced the proportion of mineralized tissue within the augmented area, and the BG + M group also showed a significantly larger area of regenerated ridge than the None group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Bone grafting with collagen membrane can maintain the alveolar ridge dimensions with substantial bone regeneration in a two‐wall‐damaged extraction socket.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84538922021-09-27 Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model Tien, Hsu Kuo Lee, Won‐Ho Kim, Chang‐Sung Choi, Seong‐Ho Gruber, Reinhard Lee, Jung‐Seok Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles AIM: To determine the healing outcome following grafting with deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) with or without collagen membrane coverage in two‐wall (both buccal and lingual)‐damaged extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distal roots of three mandibular premolars in six beagle dogs were extracted, and the whole buccal and lingual bony walls were surgically removed. Three treatment protocols were then applied according to the following group allocation: no graft (None), grafting DPBM (BG), and grafting DPBM with coverage by a collagen membrane (BG + M). Two observational periods (2 and 8 weeks) were used with the split‐mouth design, and quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed by microcomputed tomography and histology. RESULTS: The dimensions of the alveolar ridge at both grafted sites (BG and BG + M) remained similar to those of the pristine ridge in the histologic and radiographic analyses, whereas the ungrafted sites (None) collapsed both vertically and horizontally. Both grafting protocols produced substantial bony regeneration, but the addition of a covering membrane enhanced the proportion of mineralized tissue within the augmented area, and the BG + M group also showed a significantly larger area of regenerated ridge than the None group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Bone grafting with collagen membrane can maintain the alveolar ridge dimensions with substantial bone regeneration in a two‐wall‐damaged extraction socket. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-22 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8453892/ /pubmed/34101908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13791 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tien, Hsu Kuo
Lee, Won‐Ho
Kim, Chang‐Sung
Choi, Seong‐Ho
Gruber, Reinhard
Lee, Jung‐Seok
Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title_full Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title_fullStr Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title_full_unstemmed Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title_short Alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
title_sort alveolar ridge regeneration in two‐wall‐damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13791
work_keys_str_mv AT tienhsukuo alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel
AT leewonho alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel
AT kimchangsung alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel
AT choiseongho alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel
AT gruberreinhard alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel
AT leejungseok alveolarridgeregenerationintwowalldamagedextractionsocketsofaninvivoexperimentalmodel