Cargando…
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and &l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907 |
_version_ | 1784570378149953536 |
---|---|
author | Bhatia, Anju Teo, Puay Ling Li, Mingyue Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice Chan, Mei Xin Joanne Yeo, Tai Wai Mathur, Manisha Tagore, Shephali Yeo, George S. H. Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam |
author_facet | Bhatia, Anju Teo, Puay Ling Li, Mingyue Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice Chan, Mei Xin Joanne Yeo, Tai Wai Mathur, Manisha Tagore, Shephali Yeo, George S. H. Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam |
author_sort | Bhatia, Anju |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 (p‐value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%–86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65–2.29]; p‐value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88–23.67]; p‐value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL. CONCLUSION: DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL (p‐value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8453915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84539152021-09-27 Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor Bhatia, Anju Teo, Puay Ling Li, Mingyue Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice Chan, Mei Xin Joanne Yeo, Tai Wai Mathur, Manisha Tagore, Shephali Yeo, George S. H. Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 (p‐value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%–86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65–2.29]; p‐value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88–23.67]; p‐value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL. CONCLUSION: DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL (p‐value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-06-23 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8453915/ /pubmed/34162016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bhatia, Anju Teo, Puay Ling Li, Mingyue Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice Chan, Mei Xin Joanne Yeo, Tai Wai Mathur, Manisha Tagore, Shephali Yeo, George S. H. Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title | Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title_full | Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title_fullStr | Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title_full_unstemmed | Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title_short | Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor |
title_sort | dinoprostone vaginal insert (dvi) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and dvi for term induction of labor |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhatiaanju dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT teopuayling dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT limingyue dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT leejiayingbeatrice dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT chanmeixinjoanne dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT yeotaiwai dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT mathurmanisha dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT tagoreshephali dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT yeogeorgesh dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor AT arulkumaransabaratnam dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor |