Cargando…

Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and &l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatia, Anju, Teo, Puay Ling, Li, Mingyue, Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice, Chan, Mei Xin Joanne, Yeo, Tai Wai, Mathur, Manisha, Tagore, Shephali, Yeo, George S. H., Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907
_version_ 1784570378149953536
author Bhatia, Anju
Teo, Puay Ling
Li, Mingyue
Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice
Chan, Mei Xin Joanne
Yeo, Tai Wai
Mathur, Manisha
Tagore, Shephali
Yeo, George S. H.
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
author_facet Bhatia, Anju
Teo, Puay Ling
Li, Mingyue
Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice
Chan, Mei Xin Joanne
Yeo, Tai Wai
Mathur, Manisha
Tagore, Shephali
Yeo, George S. H.
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
author_sort Bhatia, Anju
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 (p‐value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%–86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65–2.29]; p‐value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88–23.67]; p‐value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL. CONCLUSION: DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL (p‐value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84539152021-09-27 Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor Bhatia, Anju Teo, Puay Ling Li, Mingyue Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice Chan, Mei Xin Joanne Yeo, Tai Wai Mathur, Manisha Tagore, Shephali Yeo, George S. H. Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 (p‐value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%–86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65–2.29]; p‐value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88–23.67]; p‐value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL. CONCLUSION: DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL (p‐value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-06-23 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8453915/ /pubmed/34162016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bhatia, Anju
Teo, Puay Ling
Li, Mingyue
Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice
Chan, Mei Xin Joanne
Yeo, Tai Wai
Mathur, Manisha
Tagore, Shephali
Yeo, George S. H.
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title_full Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title_fullStr Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title_full_unstemmed Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title_short Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
title_sort dinoprostone vaginal insert (dvi) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and dvi for term induction of labor
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatiaanju dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT teopuayling dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT limingyue dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT leejiayingbeatrice dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT chanmeixinjoanne dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT yeotaiwai dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT mathurmanisha dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT tagoreshephali dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT yeogeorgesh dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor
AT arulkumaransabaratnam dinoprostonevaginalinsertdviversusadjunctivesweepingofmembranesanddviforterminductionoflabor