Cargando…

Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?

BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the num...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarneri, Fabrizio, Corazza, Monica, Stingeni, Luca, Patruno, Cataldo, Napolitano, Maddalena, Pigatto, Paolo D. M., Gallo, Rosella, Cristaudo, Antonio, Romita, Paolo, Offidani, Annamaria, Schena, Donatella, Milanesi, Nicola, Micali, Giuseppe, Zucca, Myriam, Foti, Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839
_version_ 1784570384352280576
author Guarneri, Fabrizio
Corazza, Monica
Stingeni, Luca
Patruno, Cataldo
Napolitano, Maddalena
Pigatto, Paolo D. M.
Gallo, Rosella
Cristaudo, Antonio
Romita, Paolo
Offidani, Annamaria
Schena, Donatella
Milanesi, Nicola
Micali, Giuseppe
Zucca, Myriam
Foti, Caterina
author_facet Guarneri, Fabrizio
Corazza, Monica
Stingeni, Luca
Patruno, Cataldo
Napolitano, Maddalena
Pigatto, Paolo D. M.
Gallo, Rosella
Cristaudo, Antonio
Romita, Paolo
Offidani, Annamaria
Schena, Donatella
Milanesi, Nicola
Micali, Giuseppe
Zucca, Myriam
Foti, Caterina
author_sort Guarneri, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the number of clinically relevant patch test reactions to MP not detected by FM1. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 12 030 patients patch tested with MP and FM1 for contact dermatitis between January 2018 and December 2019 in 13 Italian dermatology clinics. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty‐nine patients (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to MP; 437 (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to FM1. Positive reactions to both MP and FM1 were observed in 119 subjects (1.0%), 310 (2.6%) reacted to MP only, 304 (2.5%) to FM1 only, 5 to MP and sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), 9 to FM1 and SSO, and 5 to MP, FM1, and SSO. Single sensitizations were clinically relevant in 75.2% of cases for MP (62.9% current, 12.3% past) and 76.3% for FM1 (70.1% current, 6.2% past). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, MP appears to be still worth testing along with FM1 in baseline series, because it allows detection of a remarkable number of fragrance allergies, often relevant, which would be otherwise missed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8453940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84539402021-09-27 Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? Guarneri, Fabrizio Corazza, Monica Stingeni, Luca Patruno, Cataldo Napolitano, Maddalena Pigatto, Paolo D. M. Gallo, Rosella Cristaudo, Antonio Romita, Paolo Offidani, Annamaria Schena, Donatella Milanesi, Nicola Micali, Giuseppe Zucca, Myriam Foti, Caterina Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the number of clinically relevant patch test reactions to MP not detected by FM1. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 12 030 patients patch tested with MP and FM1 for contact dermatitis between January 2018 and December 2019 in 13 Italian dermatology clinics. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty‐nine patients (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to MP; 437 (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to FM1. Positive reactions to both MP and FM1 were observed in 119 subjects (1.0%), 310 (2.6%) reacted to MP only, 304 (2.5%) to FM1 only, 5 to MP and sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), 9 to FM1 and SSO, and 5 to MP, FM1, and SSO. Single sensitizations were clinically relevant in 75.2% of cases for MP (62.9% current, 12.3% past) and 76.3% for FM1 (70.1% current, 6.2% past). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, MP appears to be still worth testing along with FM1 in baseline series, because it allows detection of a remarkable number of fragrance allergies, often relevant, which would be otherwise missed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-05-03 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8453940/ /pubmed/33748955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guarneri, Fabrizio
Corazza, Monica
Stingeni, Luca
Patruno, Cataldo
Napolitano, Maddalena
Pigatto, Paolo D. M.
Gallo, Rosella
Cristaudo, Antonio
Romita, Paolo
Offidani, Annamaria
Schena, Donatella
Milanesi, Nicola
Micali, Giuseppe
Zucca, Myriam
Foti, Caterina
Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title_full Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title_fullStr Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title_full_unstemmed Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title_short Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
title_sort myroxylon pereirae (balsam of peru): still worth testing?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839
work_keys_str_mv AT guarnerifabrizio myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT corazzamonica myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT stingeniluca myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT patrunocataldo myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT napolitanomaddalena myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT pigattopaolodm myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT gallorosella myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT cristaudoantonio myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT romitapaolo myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT offidaniannamaria myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT schenadonatella myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT milanesinicola myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT micaligiuseppe myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT zuccamyriam myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT foticaterina myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting
AT myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting