Cargando…
Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?
BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the num...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839 |
_version_ | 1784570384352280576 |
---|---|
author | Guarneri, Fabrizio Corazza, Monica Stingeni, Luca Patruno, Cataldo Napolitano, Maddalena Pigatto, Paolo D. M. Gallo, Rosella Cristaudo, Antonio Romita, Paolo Offidani, Annamaria Schena, Donatella Milanesi, Nicola Micali, Giuseppe Zucca, Myriam Foti, Caterina |
author_facet | Guarneri, Fabrizio Corazza, Monica Stingeni, Luca Patruno, Cataldo Napolitano, Maddalena Pigatto, Paolo D. M. Gallo, Rosella Cristaudo, Antonio Romita, Paolo Offidani, Annamaria Schena, Donatella Milanesi, Nicola Micali, Giuseppe Zucca, Myriam Foti, Caterina |
author_sort | Guarneri, Fabrizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the number of clinically relevant patch test reactions to MP not detected by FM1. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 12 030 patients patch tested with MP and FM1 for contact dermatitis between January 2018 and December 2019 in 13 Italian dermatology clinics. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty‐nine patients (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to MP; 437 (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to FM1. Positive reactions to both MP and FM1 were observed in 119 subjects (1.0%), 310 (2.6%) reacted to MP only, 304 (2.5%) to FM1 only, 5 to MP and sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), 9 to FM1 and SSO, and 5 to MP, FM1, and SSO. Single sensitizations were clinically relevant in 75.2% of cases for MP (62.9% current, 12.3% past) and 76.3% for FM1 (70.1% current, 6.2% past). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, MP appears to be still worth testing along with FM1 in baseline series, because it allows detection of a remarkable number of fragrance allergies, often relevant, which would be otherwise missed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8453940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84539402021-09-27 Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? Guarneri, Fabrizio Corazza, Monica Stingeni, Luca Patruno, Cataldo Napolitano, Maddalena Pigatto, Paolo D. M. Gallo, Rosella Cristaudo, Antonio Romita, Paolo Offidani, Annamaria Schena, Donatella Milanesi, Nicola Micali, Giuseppe Zucca, Myriam Foti, Caterina Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used “as such,” and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the number of clinically relevant patch test reactions to MP not detected by FM1. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 12 030 patients patch tested with MP and FM1 for contact dermatitis between January 2018 and December 2019 in 13 Italian dermatology clinics. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty‐nine patients (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to MP; 437 (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to FM1. Positive reactions to both MP and FM1 were observed in 119 subjects (1.0%), 310 (2.6%) reacted to MP only, 304 (2.5%) to FM1 only, 5 to MP and sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), 9 to FM1 and SSO, and 5 to MP, FM1, and SSO. Single sensitizations were clinically relevant in 75.2% of cases for MP (62.9% current, 12.3% past) and 76.3% for FM1 (70.1% current, 6.2% past). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, MP appears to be still worth testing along with FM1 in baseline series, because it allows detection of a remarkable number of fragrance allergies, often relevant, which would be otherwise missed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-05-03 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8453940/ /pubmed/33748955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Guarneri, Fabrizio Corazza, Monica Stingeni, Luca Patruno, Cataldo Napolitano, Maddalena Pigatto, Paolo D. M. Gallo, Rosella Cristaudo, Antonio Romita, Paolo Offidani, Annamaria Schena, Donatella Milanesi, Nicola Micali, Giuseppe Zucca, Myriam Foti, Caterina Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title | Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title_full | Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title_fullStr | Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title_short | Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing? |
title_sort | myroxylon pereirae (balsam of peru): still worth testing? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13839 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guarnerifabrizio myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT corazzamonica myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT stingeniluca myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT patrunocataldo myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT napolitanomaddalena myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT pigattopaolodm myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT gallorosella myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT cristaudoantonio myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT romitapaolo myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT offidaniannamaria myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT schenadonatella myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT milanesinicola myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT micaligiuseppe myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT zuccamyriam myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT foticaterina myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting AT myroxylonpereiraebalsamofperustillworthtesting |