Cargando…

Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)

BACKGROUND: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Mimi M. Y., Tang, Shuk Kwan, Ng, Shamay, Li, Yajie, Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki, Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6
_version_ 1784570420739964928
author Tse, Mimi M. Y.
Tang, Shuk Kwan
Ng, Shamay
Li, Yajie
Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki
Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho
author_facet Tse, Mimi M. Y.
Tang, Shuk Kwan
Ng, Shamay
Li, Yajie
Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki
Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho
author_sort Tse, Mimi M. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP’s intervention fidelity. METHODS: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview. RESULTS: The PVs’ attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist. As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT03823495. Registered on 30 January 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8454105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84541052021-09-21 Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) Tse, Mimi M. Y. Tang, Shuk Kwan Ng, Shamay Li, Yajie Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho Trials Research BACKGROUND: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP’s intervention fidelity. METHODS: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview. RESULTS: The PVs’ attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist. As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT03823495. Registered on 30 January 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8454105/ /pubmed/34544469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tse, Mimi M. Y.
Tang, Shuk Kwan
Ng, Shamay
Li, Yajie
Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki
Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho
Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title_full Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title_fullStr Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title_short Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
title_sort assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (pap)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tsemimimy assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap
AT tangshukkwan assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap
AT ngshamay assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap
AT liyajie assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap
AT cheungdaphneszeki assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap
AT kwanrickyiucho assessingthefidelityofapeerledchronicpainmanagementprogrampap