Cargando…
Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis
OBJECTIVES: Patients and caregivers are the primary stakeholders in ambulatory safety, given they perform daily chronic disease self-management, medication administration and outpatient follow-up. However, little attention has been given to their role in adverse events. We identified themes related...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001421 |
_version_ | 1784570494370971648 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Anjana E Huang, Beatrice Del Rosario, Jan Bing Yang, Janine Boscardin, W John Sarkar, Urmimala |
author_facet | Sharma, Anjana E Huang, Beatrice Del Rosario, Jan Bing Yang, Janine Boscardin, W John Sarkar, Urmimala |
author_sort | Sharma, Anjana E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patients and caregivers are the primary stakeholders in ambulatory safety, given they perform daily chronic disease self-management, medication administration and outpatient follow-up. However, little attention has been given to their role in adverse events. We identified themes related to patient and caregiver factors and challenges in ambulatory safety incident reports from a Patient Safety Organization. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods analysis of ambulatory incident reports submitted to the Collaborative Healthcare Patient Safety Organization, including 450 hospitals or clinic members in 13 US states. We included events that had patient and/or caregiver behavioural, socioeconomic and clinical factors that may have contributed to the event. Two members of the team independently coded patient/caregiver factors, with dual coding of 20% of events. We then conducted a ‘frequent item set’ analysis to identify which factors most frequently co-occurred. We applied inductive analysis to the most frequent sets to interpret themes. Our team included a diverse stakeholder advisory council of patients, caregivers and healthcare staff. RESULTS: We analysed 522 incident reports and excluded 73 for a final sample of 449 events. Our co-occurrence analysis found the following three themes: (1) clinical advice may conflict with patient priorities; (2) breakdowns in communication and patient education cause medication adverse events and (3) patients with disabilities are vulnerable to the external environment. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory safety reports capture both structural and behavioural factors contributing to adverse events. Actionable takeaways include the following: improving clinician counselling of patients to convey medical advice to elicit priorities, enhanced education regarding medication adverse events and expanding safety precautions for patients with disabilities at home. Ambulatory safety reporting must include patients in reporting and event review for better mitigation of future harm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8454446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84544462021-10-07 Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis Sharma, Anjana E Huang, Beatrice Del Rosario, Jan Bing Yang, Janine Boscardin, W John Sarkar, Urmimala BMJ Open Qual Original Research OBJECTIVES: Patients and caregivers are the primary stakeholders in ambulatory safety, given they perform daily chronic disease self-management, medication administration and outpatient follow-up. However, little attention has been given to their role in adverse events. We identified themes related to patient and caregiver factors and challenges in ambulatory safety incident reports from a Patient Safety Organization. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods analysis of ambulatory incident reports submitted to the Collaborative Healthcare Patient Safety Organization, including 450 hospitals or clinic members in 13 US states. We included events that had patient and/or caregiver behavioural, socioeconomic and clinical factors that may have contributed to the event. Two members of the team independently coded patient/caregiver factors, with dual coding of 20% of events. We then conducted a ‘frequent item set’ analysis to identify which factors most frequently co-occurred. We applied inductive analysis to the most frequent sets to interpret themes. Our team included a diverse stakeholder advisory council of patients, caregivers and healthcare staff. RESULTS: We analysed 522 incident reports and excluded 73 for a final sample of 449 events. Our co-occurrence analysis found the following three themes: (1) clinical advice may conflict with patient priorities; (2) breakdowns in communication and patient education cause medication adverse events and (3) patients with disabilities are vulnerable to the external environment. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory safety reports capture both structural and behavioural factors contributing to adverse events. Actionable takeaways include the following: improving clinician counselling of patients to convey medical advice to elicit priorities, enhanced education regarding medication adverse events and expanding safety precautions for patients with disabilities at home. Ambulatory safety reporting must include patients in reporting and event review for better mitigation of future harm. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8454446/ /pubmed/34544693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001421 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sharma, Anjana E Huang, Beatrice Del Rosario, Jan Bing Yang, Janine Boscardin, W John Sarkar, Urmimala Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title | Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title_full | Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title_fullStr | Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title_short | Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
title_sort | patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34544693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaanjanae patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT huangbeatrice patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT delrosariojanbing patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT yangjanine patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT boscardinwjohn patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis AT sarkarurmimala patientandcaregiverfactorsinambulatoryincidentreportsamixedmethodsanalysis |