Cargando…

Macrolide Resistance, Clinical Features, and Cytokine Profiles in Taiwanese Children With Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection

BACKGROUND: The factors that predict the progression of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection remain inconclusive. Therefore, we investigated macrolide resistance prevalence, M pneumoniae genotype, and clinical characteristics of childhood M pneumoniae respiratory tract infections in Taiwan. METHODS: A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Tsung-Hua, Wang, Nancy M, Liu, Fang-Ching, Pan, Hui-Hsien, Huang, Fang-Liang, Fang, Yu-Ping, Chiang, Ting-Wei, Yang, Yu-Ying, Song, Chiah-Sing, Wu, Hsiang-Chin, Lee, Chun-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab416
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The factors that predict the progression of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection remain inconclusive. Therefore, we investigated macrolide resistance prevalence, M pneumoniae genotype, and clinical characteristics of childhood M pneumoniae respiratory tract infections in Taiwan. METHODS: A total of 295 children hospitalized with respiratory tract infections with positive serological M pneumoniae immunoglobulin M test results were enrolled in this 3-year prospective study. Oropharyngeal swabs were obtained for M pneumoniae cultures and polymerase chain reaction tests. All M pneumoniae specimens were further characterized by P1 typing, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), and macrolide resistance genotyping. The clinical characteristics and blood cytokine profiles were analyzed accordingly. RESULTS: Of 138 M pneumoniae specimens, type I P1 was the predominant (136 of 138, 98.6%). The MLVA type P (4-4-5-7-2) was the leading strain (42 of 138, 30.4%), followed by type J, U, A, and X. The overall macrolide-resistant rate was 38.4% (53 of 138); the resistance rate increased dramatically yearly: 10.6% in 2017, 47.5% in 2018, and 62.5% in 2019 (P < .001). All macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae (MRMP) harbored the A2063G mutation and were MLVA type 4-5-7-2 (49 of 53, 92.5%), especially type U and X. No significant differences in clinical symptoms, duration of hospital stay, and radiographic findings were identified among patients between MRMP and macrolide-sensitive M pneumoniae (MSMP) groups. Patients with MRMP infection had more febrile days before and during hospitalization and higher interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-33 levels than patients with MSMP infection (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae surged in Taiwan throughout the study period, but macrolide resistance was not a determinant factor of clinical severity.