Cargando…
Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075 |
_version_ | 1784570524394848256 |
---|---|
author | Li, Cui Yang, Lili Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yuanping Qin, Linjun Li, Da Liu, Guorui |
author_facet | Li, Cui Yang, Lili Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yuanping Qin, Linjun Li, Da Liu, Guorui |
author_sort | Li, Cui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission of organic pollutants including dioxins and polychlorinated naphthalenes from solid waste incineration in China was comprehensively evaluated, and a relationship between energy benefit and pollutant emission was firstly established. The results show that production of medical and industrial waste was smaller than that of municipal waste but yielded comparable or even higher emission of dioxins. The energy benefit-to-emission index for organic pollutants (EBEI(OP)) for evaluation of solid waste management on a local or regional scale was proposed. Significant correlations between net energy benefit and pollutant emission for provinces with higher EBEI(OP) values were found. Furthermore, higher EBEI(OP) values were associated with economic factors while lower values were influenced by emission from incineration of medical and industrial waste. We suggest that an EBEI(OP) value of ≥60 can serve as a reference for “profitable” solid waste management, assisting decision making during energy benefit and environmental risk assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8454607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84546072021-09-22 Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration Li, Cui Yang, Lili Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yuanping Qin, Linjun Li, Da Liu, Guorui Innovation (Camb) Report Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission of organic pollutants including dioxins and polychlorinated naphthalenes from solid waste incineration in China was comprehensively evaluated, and a relationship between energy benefit and pollutant emission was firstly established. The results show that production of medical and industrial waste was smaller than that of municipal waste but yielded comparable or even higher emission of dioxins. The energy benefit-to-emission index for organic pollutants (EBEI(OP)) for evaluation of solid waste management on a local or regional scale was proposed. Significant correlations between net energy benefit and pollutant emission for provinces with higher EBEI(OP) values were found. Furthermore, higher EBEI(OP) values were associated with economic factors while lower values were influenced by emission from incineration of medical and industrial waste. We suggest that an EBEI(OP) value of ≥60 can serve as a reference for “profitable” solid waste management, assisting decision making during energy benefit and environmental risk assessment. Elsevier 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8454607/ /pubmed/34557732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Report Li, Cui Yang, Lili Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yuanping Qin, Linjun Li, Da Liu, Guorui Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title | Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title_full | Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title_fullStr | Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title_full_unstemmed | Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title_short | Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration |
title_sort | bridging the energy benefit and pops emission risk from waste incineration |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT licui bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT yanglili bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT liuxiaoyun bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT yangyuanping bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT qinlinjun bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT lida bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration AT liuguorui bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration |