Cargando…

Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration

Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Cui, Yang, Lili, Liu, Xiaoyun, Yang, Yuanping, Qin, Linjun, Li, Da, Liu, Guorui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075
_version_ 1784570524394848256
author Li, Cui
Yang, Lili
Liu, Xiaoyun
Yang, Yuanping
Qin, Linjun
Li, Da
Liu, Guorui
author_facet Li, Cui
Yang, Lili
Liu, Xiaoyun
Yang, Yuanping
Qin, Linjun
Li, Da
Liu, Guorui
author_sort Li, Cui
collection PubMed
description Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission of organic pollutants including dioxins and polychlorinated naphthalenes from solid waste incineration in China was comprehensively evaluated, and a relationship between energy benefit and pollutant emission was firstly established. The results show that production of medical and industrial waste was smaller than that of municipal waste but yielded comparable or even higher emission of dioxins. The energy benefit-to-emission index for organic pollutants (EBEI(OP)) for evaluation of solid waste management on a local or regional scale was proposed. Significant correlations between net energy benefit and pollutant emission for provinces with higher EBEI(OP) values were found. Furthermore, higher EBEI(OP) values were associated with economic factors while lower values were influenced by emission from incineration of medical and industrial waste. We suggest that an EBEI(OP) value of ≥60 can serve as a reference for “profitable” solid waste management, assisting decision making during energy benefit and environmental risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8454607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84546072021-09-22 Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration Li, Cui Yang, Lili Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yuanping Qin, Linjun Li, Da Liu, Guorui Innovation (Camb) Report Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission of organic pollutants including dioxins and polychlorinated naphthalenes from solid waste incineration in China was comprehensively evaluated, and a relationship between energy benefit and pollutant emission was firstly established. The results show that production of medical and industrial waste was smaller than that of municipal waste but yielded comparable or even higher emission of dioxins. The energy benefit-to-emission index for organic pollutants (EBEI(OP)) for evaluation of solid waste management on a local or regional scale was proposed. Significant correlations between net energy benefit and pollutant emission for provinces with higher EBEI(OP) values were found. Furthermore, higher EBEI(OP) values were associated with economic factors while lower values were influenced by emission from incineration of medical and industrial waste. We suggest that an EBEI(OP) value of ≥60 can serve as a reference for “profitable” solid waste management, assisting decision making during energy benefit and environmental risk assessment. Elsevier 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8454607/ /pubmed/34557732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Li, Cui
Yang, Lili
Liu, Xiaoyun
Yang, Yuanping
Qin, Linjun
Li, Da
Liu, Guorui
Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title_full Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title_fullStr Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title_short Bridging the Energy Benefit and POPs Emission Risk from Waste Incineration
title_sort bridging the energy benefit and pops emission risk from waste incineration
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075
work_keys_str_mv AT licui bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT yanglili bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT liuxiaoyun bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT yangyuanping bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT qinlinjun bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT lida bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration
AT liuguorui bridgingtheenergybenefitandpopsemissionriskfromwasteincineration