Cargando…

A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk

In this paper, we consider a fuzzy portfolio selection problem with systematic risk and non-systematic risk simultaneously. These two kinds of risks are measured by beta coefficient and random error variance obtained by Sharp Single Index Model. The total risk as the objective of portfolio decision...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Xue, Yuan, Yongkang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06226-x
_version_ 1784570645627011072
author Deng, Xue
Yuan, Yongkang
author_facet Deng, Xue
Yuan, Yongkang
author_sort Deng, Xue
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we consider a fuzzy portfolio selection problem with systematic risk and non-systematic risk simultaneously. These two kinds of risks are measured by beta coefficient and random error variance obtained by Sharp Single Index Model. The total risk as the objective of portfolio decision is obtained by weighting the two kinds of risk. Among them, the weight of systematic risk [Formula: see text] is regarded as the degree of investors' attention to system risk in economic sense. In addition, the fuzzy return and the degree of diversification are measured by triangular fuzzy number and entropy, respectively. And they are also considered the goal of investment decisions. Hence, a tri-objective portfolio is proposed in this paper. For the fuzzy objectives in the model, a goal programming method based on fuzzy dominance is proposed, which can help investors better capture the ideal point of fuzzy returns according to their risk preference. Finally, combined with the systematic impact of COVID-19 on the financial market, we make an empirical analysis based on our proposed model. The results show that the total risk will be on the high side when [Formula: see text] value is too large or too small. That means paying too much or little attention to the systematic risk will lead investors to bear more risk. In addition, when investors ignore the systematic risk; that is, the [Formula: see text] value is low, and investors will concentrate their funds in the same industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8455307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84553072021-09-22 A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk Deng, Xue Yuan, Yongkang Soft comput Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics In this paper, we consider a fuzzy portfolio selection problem with systematic risk and non-systematic risk simultaneously. These two kinds of risks are measured by beta coefficient and random error variance obtained by Sharp Single Index Model. The total risk as the objective of portfolio decision is obtained by weighting the two kinds of risk. Among them, the weight of systematic risk [Formula: see text] is regarded as the degree of investors' attention to system risk in economic sense. In addition, the fuzzy return and the degree of diversification are measured by triangular fuzzy number and entropy, respectively. And they are also considered the goal of investment decisions. Hence, a tri-objective portfolio is proposed in this paper. For the fuzzy objectives in the model, a goal programming method based on fuzzy dominance is proposed, which can help investors better capture the ideal point of fuzzy returns according to their risk preference. Finally, combined with the systematic impact of COVID-19 on the financial market, we make an empirical analysis based on our proposed model. The results show that the total risk will be on the high side when [Formula: see text] value is too large or too small. That means paying too much or little attention to the systematic risk will lead investors to bear more risk. In addition, when investors ignore the systematic risk; that is, the [Formula: see text] value is low, and investors will concentrate their funds in the same industry. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8455307/ /pubmed/34566487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06226-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics
Deng, Xue
Yuan, Yongkang
A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title_full A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title_fullStr A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title_full_unstemmed A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title_short A novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
title_sort novel fuzzy dominant goal programming for portfolio selection with systematic risk and non-systematic risk
topic Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06226-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dengxue anovelfuzzydominantgoalprogrammingforportfolioselectionwithsystematicriskandnonsystematicrisk
AT yuanyongkang anovelfuzzydominantgoalprogrammingforportfolioselectionwithsystematicriskandnonsystematicrisk
AT dengxue novelfuzzydominantgoalprogrammingforportfolioselectionwithsystematicriskandnonsystematicrisk
AT yuanyongkang novelfuzzydominantgoalprogrammingforportfolioselectionwithsystematicriskandnonsystematicrisk