Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34088970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8 |
_version_ | 1784570648875499520 |
---|---|
author | Boyers, D. Retat, L. Jacobsen, E. Avenell, A. Aveyard, P. Corbould, E. Jaccard, A. Cooper, D. Robertson, C. Aceves-Martins, M. Xu, B. Skea, Z. de Bruin, M. |
author_facet | Boyers, D. Retat, L. Jacobsen, E. Avenell, A. Aveyard, P. Corbould, E. Jaccard, A. Cooper, D. Robertson, C. Aceves-Martins, M. Xu, B. Skea, Z. de Bruin, M. |
author_sort | Boyers, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results. RESULTS: RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8455321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84553212021-10-07 Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model Boyers, D. Retat, L. Jacobsen, E. Avenell, A. Aveyard, P. Corbould, E. Jaccard, A. Cooper, D. Robertson, C. Aceves-Martins, M. Xu, B. Skea, Z. de Bruin, M. Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results. RESULTS: RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8455321/ /pubmed/34088970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Boyers, D. Retat, L. Jacobsen, E. Avenell, A. Aveyard, P. Corbould, E. Jaccard, A. Cooper, D. Robertson, C. Aceves-Martins, M. Xu, B. Skea, Z. de Bruin, M. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title | Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34088970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boyersd costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT retatl costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT jacobsene costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT avenella costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT aveyardp costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT corboulde costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT jaccarda costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT cooperd costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT robertsonc costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT acevesmartinsm costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT xub costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT skeaz costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT debruinm costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel AT costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel |