Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model

OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyers, D., Retat, L., Jacobsen, E., Avenell, A., Aveyard, P., Corbould, E., Jaccard, A., Cooper, D., Robertson, C., Aceves-Martins, M., Xu, B., Skea, Z., de Bruin, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34088970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8
_version_ 1784570648875499520
author Boyers, D.
Retat, L.
Jacobsen, E.
Avenell, A.
Aveyard, P.
Corbould, E.
Jaccard, A.
Cooper, D.
Robertson, C.
Aceves-Martins, M.
Xu, B.
Skea, Z.
de Bruin, M.
author_facet Boyers, D.
Retat, L.
Jacobsen, E.
Avenell, A.
Aveyard, P.
Corbould, E.
Jaccard, A.
Cooper, D.
Robertson, C.
Aceves-Martins, M.
Xu, B.
Skea, Z.
de Bruin, M.
author_sort Boyers, D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results. RESULTS: RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8455321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84553212021-10-07 Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model Boyers, D. Retat, L. Jacobsen, E. Avenell, A. Aveyard, P. Corbould, E. Jaccard, A. Cooper, D. Robertson, C. Aceves-Martins, M. Xu, B. Skea, Z. de Bruin, M. Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases. METHODS: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results. RESULTS: RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8455321/ /pubmed/34088970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Boyers, D.
Retat, L.
Jacobsen, E.
Avenell, A.
Aveyard, P.
Corbould, E.
Jaccard, A.
Cooper, D.
Robertson, C.
Aceves-Martins, M.
Xu, B.
Skea, Z.
de Bruin, M.
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title_full Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title_short Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
title_sort cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34088970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boyersd costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT retatl costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT jacobsene costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT avenella costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT aveyardp costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT corboulde costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT jaccarda costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT cooperd costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT robertsonc costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT acevesmartinsm costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT xub costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT skeaz costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT debruinm costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel
AT costeffectivenessofbariatricsurgeryandnonsurgicalweightmanagementprogrammesforadultswithsevereobesityadecisionanalysismodel