Cargando…

Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND: A favorable model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and stratifying prognostic risk in breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is lacking. The aim of the current study was to formulate an excellent model specially for predicting prognosis in these patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, N., Wu, J., Xiao, J., Wang, Z., Song, Z., Ke, Z., Wang, R., Wei, M., Xu, M., Wei, J., Qian, X., Xu, X., Yi, J., Wang, T., Zhang, J., Li, N., Fan, J., Hou, G., Wang, Y., Ling, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100269
_version_ 1784570723797303296
author Hou, N.
Wu, J.
Xiao, J.
Wang, Z.
Song, Z.
Ke, Z.
Wang, R.
Wei, M.
Xu, M.
Wei, J.
Qian, X.
Xu, X.
Yi, J.
Wang, T.
Zhang, J.
Li, N.
Fan, J.
Hou, G.
Wang, Y.
Wang, Z.
Ling, R.
author_facet Hou, N.
Wu, J.
Xiao, J.
Wang, Z.
Song, Z.
Ke, Z.
Wang, R.
Wei, M.
Xu, M.
Wei, J.
Qian, X.
Xu, X.
Yi, J.
Wang, T.
Zhang, J.
Li, N.
Fan, J.
Hou, G.
Wang, Y.
Wang, Z.
Ling, R.
author_sort Hou, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A favorable model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and stratifying prognostic risk in breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is lacking. The aim of the current study was to formulate an excellent model specially for predicting prognosis in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2015, 749 early-stage BC patients who received NAC in Xijing hospital were included. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 563) and an independent cohort (n = 186). A prognostic model was created and subsequently validated. Predictive performance and discrimination were further measured and compared with other models. RESULTS: Clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, grade, estrogen receptor expression, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and treatment, Ki-67 expression, lymphovascular invasion, and residual cancer burden were identified as independent prognostic variables for BC treated with NAC. The C-index of the model consistently outperformed other available models as well as single independent factors with 0.78, 0.80, 0.75, 0.82, and 0.77 in the training cohort, independent cohort, luminal BC, HER2-positive BC, and triple-negative BC, respectively. With the optimal cut-off values (280 and 360) selected by X-tile, patients were categorized as low-risk (total points ≤280), moderate-risk (280 < total points ≤ 360), and high-risk (total points >360) groups presenting significantly different 5-year DFS of 89.9%, 56.9%, and 27.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BC, the first model including residual cancer burden index was demonstrated to predict the survival of individuals with favorable performance and discrimination. Furthermore, the risk stratification generated by it could determine the risk level of recurrence in whole early-stage BC cohort and subtype-specific cohorts, help tailor personalized intensive treatment, and select comparable study cohort in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8455687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84556872021-09-27 Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy Hou, N. Wu, J. Xiao, J. Wang, Z. Song, Z. Ke, Z. Wang, R. Wei, M. Xu, M. Wei, J. Qian, X. Xu, X. Yi, J. Wang, T. Zhang, J. Li, N. Fan, J. Hou, G. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Ling, R. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: A favorable model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and stratifying prognostic risk in breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is lacking. The aim of the current study was to formulate an excellent model specially for predicting prognosis in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2015, 749 early-stage BC patients who received NAC in Xijing hospital were included. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 563) and an independent cohort (n = 186). A prognostic model was created and subsequently validated. Predictive performance and discrimination were further measured and compared with other models. RESULTS: Clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, grade, estrogen receptor expression, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and treatment, Ki-67 expression, lymphovascular invasion, and residual cancer burden were identified as independent prognostic variables for BC treated with NAC. The C-index of the model consistently outperformed other available models as well as single independent factors with 0.78, 0.80, 0.75, 0.82, and 0.77 in the training cohort, independent cohort, luminal BC, HER2-positive BC, and triple-negative BC, respectively. With the optimal cut-off values (280 and 360) selected by X-tile, patients were categorized as low-risk (total points ≤280), moderate-risk (280 < total points ≤ 360), and high-risk (total points >360) groups presenting significantly different 5-year DFS of 89.9%, 56.9%, and 27.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BC, the first model including residual cancer burden index was demonstrated to predict the survival of individuals with favorable performance and discrimination. Furthermore, the risk stratification generated by it could determine the risk level of recurrence in whole early-stage BC cohort and subtype-specific cohorts, help tailor personalized intensive treatment, and select comparable study cohort in clinical trials. Elsevier 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8455687/ /pubmed/34537675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100269 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hou, N.
Wu, J.
Xiao, J.
Wang, Z.
Song, Z.
Ke, Z.
Wang, R.
Wei, M.
Xu, M.
Wei, J.
Qian, X.
Xu, X.
Yi, J.
Wang, T.
Zhang, J.
Li, N.
Fan, J.
Hou, G.
Wang, Y.
Wang, Z.
Ling, R.
Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title_full Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title_fullStr Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title_full_unstemmed Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title_short Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
title_sort development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model integrating residual cancer burden to predict individual prognosis in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100269
work_keys_str_mv AT houn developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wuj developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT xiaoj developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangz developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT songz developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT kez developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangr developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT weim developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT xum developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT weij developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT qianx developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT xux developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT yij developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangt developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT zhangj developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT lin developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT fanj developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT houg developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangy developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangz developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy
AT lingr developmentverificationandcomparisonofariskstratificationmodelintegratingresidualcancerburdentopredictindividualprognosisinearlystagebreastcancertreatedwithneoadjuvanttherapy