Cargando…

Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: The relative importance of income, poverty and unemployment status for mental health is unclear, and understanding this has implications for income and welfare policy design. We aimed to assess the association between changes in these exposures and mental health. METHODS: We measured eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kromydas, Theocharis, Thomson, Rachel M., Pulford, Andrew, Green, Michael J., Katikireddi, S. Vittal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100909
_version_ 1784570748588785664
author Kromydas, Theocharis
Thomson, Rachel M.
Pulford, Andrew
Green, Michael J.
Katikireddi, S. Vittal
author_facet Kromydas, Theocharis
Thomson, Rachel M.
Pulford, Andrew
Green, Michael J.
Katikireddi, S. Vittal
author_sort Kromydas, Theocharis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relative importance of income, poverty and unemployment status for mental health is unclear, and understanding this has implications for income and welfare policy design. We aimed to assess the association between changes in these exposures and mental health. METHODS: We measured effects of three transition exposures between waves of the UK Household Longitudinal Study from 2010/11–2019/20 (n=38,697, obs=173,859): income decreases/increases, moving in/out of poverty, and job losses/gains. The outcome was General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), which measures likelihood of common mental disorder (CMD) as a continuous (GHQ-36) and binary measure (score ≥4 = case). We used fixed-effects linear and linear probability models to adjust for time invariant and time-varying confounders. To investigate effect modification, we stratified analyses by age, sex and highest education. RESULTS: A 10% income decrease/increase was associated with a 0.02% increase (95% CI 0.00, 0.04) and 0.01% reduction (95% CI -0.03, 0.02) in likelihood of CMD respectively. Effect sizes were larger for moving into poverty (+1.8% [0.2, 3.5]), out of poverty (−1.8%, [-3.2, −0.3]), job loss (+15.8%, [13.6, 18.0]) and job gain (−11.4%, [-14.4, −8.4]). The effect of new poverty was greater for women (+2.3% [0.8, 3.9] versus +1.2% [-1.1, 3.5] for men) but the opposite was true for job loss (+17.8% [14.4, 21.2] for men versus +13.5% [9.8, 17.2] for women). There were no clear differences by age, but those with least education experienced the largest effects from poverty transitions, especially moving out of poverty (−2.9%, [-5.7, −0.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Moving into unemployment was most strongly associated with CMD, with poverty also important but income effects generally much smaller. Men appear most sensitive to employment transitions, but poverty may have larger impacts on women and those with least education. As the COVID-19 pandemic recedes, minimising unemployment as well as poverty is crucial for population mental health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8455855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84558552021-09-27 Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study Kromydas, Theocharis Thomson, Rachel M. Pulford, Andrew Green, Michael J. Katikireddi, S. Vittal SSM Popul Health Article BACKGROUND: The relative importance of income, poverty and unemployment status for mental health is unclear, and understanding this has implications for income and welfare policy design. We aimed to assess the association between changes in these exposures and mental health. METHODS: We measured effects of three transition exposures between waves of the UK Household Longitudinal Study from 2010/11–2019/20 (n=38,697, obs=173,859): income decreases/increases, moving in/out of poverty, and job losses/gains. The outcome was General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), which measures likelihood of common mental disorder (CMD) as a continuous (GHQ-36) and binary measure (score ≥4 = case). We used fixed-effects linear and linear probability models to adjust for time invariant and time-varying confounders. To investigate effect modification, we stratified analyses by age, sex and highest education. RESULTS: A 10% income decrease/increase was associated with a 0.02% increase (95% CI 0.00, 0.04) and 0.01% reduction (95% CI -0.03, 0.02) in likelihood of CMD respectively. Effect sizes were larger for moving into poverty (+1.8% [0.2, 3.5]), out of poverty (−1.8%, [-3.2, −0.3]), job loss (+15.8%, [13.6, 18.0]) and job gain (−11.4%, [-14.4, −8.4]). The effect of new poverty was greater for women (+2.3% [0.8, 3.9] versus +1.2% [-1.1, 3.5] for men) but the opposite was true for job loss (+17.8% [14.4, 21.2] for men versus +13.5% [9.8, 17.2] for women). There were no clear differences by age, but those with least education experienced the largest effects from poverty transitions, especially moving out of poverty (−2.9%, [-5.7, −0.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Moving into unemployment was most strongly associated with CMD, with poverty also important but income effects generally much smaller. Men appear most sensitive to employment transitions, but poverty may have larger impacts on women and those with least education. As the COVID-19 pandemic recedes, minimising unemployment as well as poverty is crucial for population mental health. Elsevier 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8455855/ /pubmed/34584931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100909 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kromydas, Theocharis
Thomson, Rachel M.
Pulford, Andrew
Green, Michael J.
Katikireddi, S. Vittal
Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title_full Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title_short Which is most important for mental health: Money, poverty, or paid work? A fixed-effects analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study
title_sort which is most important for mental health: money, poverty, or paid work? a fixed-effects analysis of the uk household longitudinal study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8455855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100909
work_keys_str_mv AT kromydastheocharis whichismostimportantformentalhealthmoneypovertyorpaidworkafixedeffectsanalysisoftheukhouseholdlongitudinalstudy
AT thomsonrachelm whichismostimportantformentalhealthmoneypovertyorpaidworkafixedeffectsanalysisoftheukhouseholdlongitudinalstudy
AT pulfordandrew whichismostimportantformentalhealthmoneypovertyorpaidworkafixedeffectsanalysisoftheukhouseholdlongitudinalstudy
AT greenmichaelj whichismostimportantformentalhealthmoneypovertyorpaidworkafixedeffectsanalysisoftheukhouseholdlongitudinalstudy
AT katikireddisvittal whichismostimportantformentalhealthmoneypovertyorpaidworkafixedeffectsanalysisoftheukhouseholdlongitudinalstudy