Cargando…

Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma

Non‐thermal, intermediate frequency (100–500 kHz) electrotherapies present a unique therapeutic strategy to treat malignant neoplasms. Here, pulsed electric fields (PEFs) which induce reversible or irreversible electroporation (IRE) and tumour‐treating fields (TTFs) are reviewed highlighting the fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Elise P. W., Finch, Alina, Gerigk, Magda, Triantis, Iasonas F., Watts, Colin, Malliaras, George G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100978
_version_ 1784570829316554752
author Jenkins, Elise P. W.
Finch, Alina
Gerigk, Magda
Triantis, Iasonas F.
Watts, Colin
Malliaras, George G.
author_facet Jenkins, Elise P. W.
Finch, Alina
Gerigk, Magda
Triantis, Iasonas F.
Watts, Colin
Malliaras, George G.
author_sort Jenkins, Elise P. W.
collection PubMed
description Non‐thermal, intermediate frequency (100–500 kHz) electrotherapies present a unique therapeutic strategy to treat malignant neoplasms. Here, pulsed electric fields (PEFs) which induce reversible or irreversible electroporation (IRE) and tumour‐treating fields (TTFs) are reviewed highlighting the foundations, advances, and considerations of each method when applied to glioblastoma (GBM). Several biological aspects of GBM that contribute to treatment complexity (heterogeneity, recurrence, resistance, and blood‐brain barrier(BBB)) and electrophysiological traits which are suggested to promote glioma progression are described. Particularly, the biological responses at the cellular and molecular level to specific parameters of the electrical stimuli are discussed offering ways to compare these parameters despite the lack of a universally adopted physical description. Reviewing the literature, a disconnect is found between electrotherapy techniques and how they target the biological complexities of GBM that make treatment difficult in the first place. An attempt is made to bridge the interdisciplinary gap by mapping biological characteristics to different methods of electrotherapy, suggesting important future research topics and directions in both understanding and treating GBM. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that attempts an in‐tandem assessment of the biological effects of different aspects of intermediate frequency electrotherapy methods, thus offering possible strategies toward GBM treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8456216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84562162021-09-27 Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma Jenkins, Elise P. W. Finch, Alina Gerigk, Magda Triantis, Iasonas F. Watts, Colin Malliaras, George G. Adv Sci (Weinh) Reviews Non‐thermal, intermediate frequency (100–500 kHz) electrotherapies present a unique therapeutic strategy to treat malignant neoplasms. Here, pulsed electric fields (PEFs) which induce reversible or irreversible electroporation (IRE) and tumour‐treating fields (TTFs) are reviewed highlighting the foundations, advances, and considerations of each method when applied to glioblastoma (GBM). Several biological aspects of GBM that contribute to treatment complexity (heterogeneity, recurrence, resistance, and blood‐brain barrier(BBB)) and electrophysiological traits which are suggested to promote glioma progression are described. Particularly, the biological responses at the cellular and molecular level to specific parameters of the electrical stimuli are discussed offering ways to compare these parameters despite the lack of a universally adopted physical description. Reviewing the literature, a disconnect is found between electrotherapy techniques and how they target the biological complexities of GBM that make treatment difficult in the first place. An attempt is made to bridge the interdisciplinary gap by mapping biological characteristics to different methods of electrotherapy, suggesting important future research topics and directions in both understanding and treating GBM. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that attempts an in‐tandem assessment of the biological effects of different aspects of intermediate frequency electrotherapy methods, thus offering possible strategies toward GBM treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8456216/ /pubmed/34292672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100978 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Jenkins, Elise P. W.
Finch, Alina
Gerigk, Magda
Triantis, Iasonas F.
Watts, Colin
Malliaras, George G.
Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title_full Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title_fullStr Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title_short Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma
title_sort electrotherapies for glioblastoma
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100978
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinselisepw electrotherapiesforglioblastoma
AT finchalina electrotherapiesforglioblastoma
AT gerigkmagda electrotherapiesforglioblastoma
AT triantisiasonasf electrotherapiesforglioblastoma
AT wattscolin electrotherapiesforglioblastoma
AT malliarasgeorgeg electrotherapiesforglioblastoma