Cargando…

Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Evolving digitization has an impact not only on the organization of work, but also on the health of employees. Dealing with new technologies, integrating new processes and requirements into work, and restructuring tasks among others are demands that can be stressful and impair health. OB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zolg, Sabrina, Heiden, Barbara, Herbig, Britta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z
_version_ 1784570897081827328
author Zolg, Sabrina
Heiden, Barbara
Herbig, Britta
author_facet Zolg, Sabrina
Heiden, Barbara
Herbig, Britta
author_sort Zolg, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evolving digitization has an impact not only on the organization of work, but also on the health of employees. Dealing with new technologies, integrating new processes and requirements into work, and restructuring tasks among others are demands that can be stressful and impair health. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify (clusters of) working conditions associated with digitally connected work and to analyze their relations with strain, that is, health and well-being outcomes. METHODS: Between May and October 2019, a search string was used to systematically search six databases (EMBASE, Medline, PSYNDEX, PsycInfo, SocIndex, WISO) for German and English texts according to the PEO scheme. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Design. RESULTS: 14 studies were identified. Despite the search string containing latest technologies, we identified mostly studies from the 1980s/90s. To aggregate findings, a categorization of work factors (cognitive demands, social factors, organizational factors, environmental factors) and health factors (motivation/satisfaction, reduced well-being/affective symptoms, physiological parameters/somatic complaints) is introduced. The most frequently identified work factors belong to the category of cognitive demands. For health factors, motivation/satisfaction was identified most often. 475 associations were found in total. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides an overview of work and health factors that have been studied between 1981 and 2019. Recent texts frequently study individualized health factors (e.g., life satisfaction) whereas objective physiological measurement data and objective survey methods such as workplace analysis are not used. This latter approach was predominantly found in the older studies. In order to obtain a comprehensive picture, however, it is worthwhile to use a combination of these subjective and objective approaches for future studies in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8456588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84565882021-09-22 Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review Zolg, Sabrina Heiden, Barbara Herbig, Britta J Occup Med Toxicol Review BACKGROUND: Evolving digitization has an impact not only on the organization of work, but also on the health of employees. Dealing with new technologies, integrating new processes and requirements into work, and restructuring tasks among others are demands that can be stressful and impair health. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify (clusters of) working conditions associated with digitally connected work and to analyze their relations with strain, that is, health and well-being outcomes. METHODS: Between May and October 2019, a search string was used to systematically search six databases (EMBASE, Medline, PSYNDEX, PsycInfo, SocIndex, WISO) for German and English texts according to the PEO scheme. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Design. RESULTS: 14 studies were identified. Despite the search string containing latest technologies, we identified mostly studies from the 1980s/90s. To aggregate findings, a categorization of work factors (cognitive demands, social factors, organizational factors, environmental factors) and health factors (motivation/satisfaction, reduced well-being/affective symptoms, physiological parameters/somatic complaints) is introduced. The most frequently identified work factors belong to the category of cognitive demands. For health factors, motivation/satisfaction was identified most often. 475 associations were found in total. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides an overview of work and health factors that have been studied between 1981 and 2019. Recent texts frequently study individualized health factors (e.g., life satisfaction) whereas objective physiological measurement data and objective survey methods such as workplace analysis are not used. This latter approach was predominantly found in the older studies. In order to obtain a comprehensive picture, however, it is worthwhile to use a combination of these subjective and objective approaches for future studies in this field. BioMed Central 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8456588/ /pubmed/34551792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Zolg, Sabrina
Heiden, Barbara
Herbig, Britta
Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title_full Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title_fullStr Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title_short Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
title_sort digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zolgsabrina digitallyconnectedworkanditsconsequencesforstrainasystematicreview
AT heidenbarbara digitallyconnectedworkanditsconsequencesforstrainasystematicreview
AT herbigbritta digitallyconnectedworkanditsconsequencesforstrainasystematicreview