Cargando…
Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals
BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is common among patients with hemodialysis, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Health care professionals have an important role in assessing risk of nonadherence and intervening to support adherence. The aim of this study was to explore physicians’ and nurses’ cu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02514-8 |
_version_ | 1784570900642791424 |
---|---|
author | Mechta Nielsen, Trine Schjerning, Nina Kaldan, Gudrun Hornum, Mads Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo Thomsen, Thordis |
author_facet | Mechta Nielsen, Trine Schjerning, Nina Kaldan, Gudrun Hornum, Mads Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo Thomsen, Thordis |
author_sort | Mechta Nielsen, Trine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is common among patients with hemodialysis, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Health care professionals have an important role in assessing risk of nonadherence and intervening to support adherence. The aim of this study was to explore physicians’ and nurses’ current medication adherence practices in hemodialysis settings. METHOD: A generic qualitative design with inductive content analysis and focus group methodology. Focus groups with health care professionals were conducted in four Nephrology Centers, representing three different regions of Denmark. An interview guide was developed in collaboration with 3 patient representatives. RESULTS: Six focus group interviews involving a total of forty-two health care professionals were conducted. Five main categories were identified; Laboratory tests are the “gold standard” for assessing adherence, suggesting that abnormal results motivated investigation of adherence, Varying practices for supporting adherence, alluding to the impact of individual clinician priority and preference on choice of adherence interventions, Unclear allocation of roles and responsibility, specifically referring to uncertainty in the delegation of roles between physicians and nurses, Navigating time and resource limitations, intimating the resources needed to support medication adherence and Suggestions for future strategies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest implementing systematic use of validated patient-reported outcome measures for assessing adherence and deprescribing tools to support adherence, as these instruments might identify the patients who are in most need of support and promote patient adherence to their prescribed medications. The findings also point to a need for interdisciplinary clarification of roles and responsibilities regarding medication adherence, with the aim of building a strong collaborative partnership between professions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02514-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8456602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84566022021-09-22 Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals Mechta Nielsen, Trine Schjerning, Nina Kaldan, Gudrun Hornum, Mads Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo Thomsen, Thordis BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is common among patients with hemodialysis, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Health care professionals have an important role in assessing risk of nonadherence and intervening to support adherence. The aim of this study was to explore physicians’ and nurses’ current medication adherence practices in hemodialysis settings. METHOD: A generic qualitative design with inductive content analysis and focus group methodology. Focus groups with health care professionals were conducted in four Nephrology Centers, representing three different regions of Denmark. An interview guide was developed in collaboration with 3 patient representatives. RESULTS: Six focus group interviews involving a total of forty-two health care professionals were conducted. Five main categories were identified; Laboratory tests are the “gold standard” for assessing adherence, suggesting that abnormal results motivated investigation of adherence, Varying practices for supporting adherence, alluding to the impact of individual clinician priority and preference on choice of adherence interventions, Unclear allocation of roles and responsibility, specifically referring to uncertainty in the delegation of roles between physicians and nurses, Navigating time and resource limitations, intimating the resources needed to support medication adherence and Suggestions for future strategies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest implementing systematic use of validated patient-reported outcome measures for assessing adherence and deprescribing tools to support adherence, as these instruments might identify the patients who are in most need of support and promote patient adherence to their prescribed medications. The findings also point to a need for interdisciplinary clarification of roles and responsibilities regarding medication adherence, with the aim of building a strong collaborative partnership between professions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02514-8. BioMed Central 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8456602/ /pubmed/34551750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02514-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mechta Nielsen, Trine Schjerning, Nina Kaldan, Gudrun Hornum, Mads Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo Thomsen, Thordis Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title | Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title_full | Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title_fullStr | Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title_short | Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
title_sort | practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings – a focus-group study of health care professionals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02514-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mechtanielsentrine practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals AT schjerningnina practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals AT kaldangudrun practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals AT hornummads practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals AT feldtrasmussenbo practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals AT thomsenthordis practicesandpitfallsinmedicationadherenceinhemodialysissettingsafocusgroupstudyofhealthcareprofessionals |