Cargando…

Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations

BACKGROUND: Globally, 3 billion people suffer from either migraine or tension-type headache disorder over their lifetime. Approximately 50% of American adults suffering from headache or migraine have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), however, the quality and quantity of recommendati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Jeremy Y., Hanna, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3
_version_ 1784570916343119872
author Ng, Jeremy Y.
Hanna, Christina
author_facet Ng, Jeremy Y.
Hanna, Christina
author_sort Ng, Jeremy Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, 3 billion people suffer from either migraine or tension-type headache disorder over their lifetime. Approximately 50% of American adults suffering from headache or migraine have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), however, the quality and quantity of recommendations associated with such therapies across clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of these conditions are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the quantity and assess the quality of such CAM recommendations. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched from 2009 to April 2020; the Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites were also searched for eligible CPGs. CPGs were included if they provided any therapy recommendations. Eligible CPGs included those written for adult patients with headache and migraine; CPGs containing CAM recommendations were assessed twice for quality using the AGREE II instrument, once for the overall CPG and once for the CAM sections. RESULTS: Of 486 unique search results, 21 CPGs were eligible and quality assessed; fifteen CPGs mentioned CAM, of which 13 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The overall CPG assessment yielded higher scaled domain percentages than the CAM section across all domains. The results from highest to lowest were as follows (overall, CAM): clarity of presentation (66.7% vs. 50.0%), scope and purpose (63.9% vs. 61.1%), stakeholder involvement (22.2% vs. 13.9%), rigour of development (13.5% vs. 9.4%), applicability (6.3% vs. 0.0%), and editorial independence (0.0% vs. 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Of the eligible CPGs, the CAM sections were of lower quality compared to the overall recommendations across all domains of the AGREE II instrument. CPGs that scored well could serve as a framework for discussion between patients and healthcare professionals regarding use of CAM therapies in the context of headache and migraine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8456672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84566722021-09-22 Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations Ng, Jeremy Y. Hanna, Christina BMC Complement Med Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Globally, 3 billion people suffer from either migraine or tension-type headache disorder over their lifetime. Approximately 50% of American adults suffering from headache or migraine have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), however, the quality and quantity of recommendations associated with such therapies across clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of these conditions are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the quantity and assess the quality of such CAM recommendations. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched from 2009 to April 2020; the Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites were also searched for eligible CPGs. CPGs were included if they provided any therapy recommendations. Eligible CPGs included those written for adult patients with headache and migraine; CPGs containing CAM recommendations were assessed twice for quality using the AGREE II instrument, once for the overall CPG and once for the CAM sections. RESULTS: Of 486 unique search results, 21 CPGs were eligible and quality assessed; fifteen CPGs mentioned CAM, of which 13 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The overall CPG assessment yielded higher scaled domain percentages than the CAM section across all domains. The results from highest to lowest were as follows (overall, CAM): clarity of presentation (66.7% vs. 50.0%), scope and purpose (63.9% vs. 61.1%), stakeholder involvement (22.2% vs. 13.9%), rigour of development (13.5% vs. 9.4%), applicability (6.3% vs. 0.0%), and editorial independence (0.0% vs. 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Of the eligible CPGs, the CAM sections were of lower quality compared to the overall recommendations across all domains of the AGREE II instrument. CPGs that scored well could serve as a framework for discussion between patients and healthcare professionals regarding use of CAM therapies in the context of headache and migraine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3. BioMed Central 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8456672/ /pubmed/34551759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ng, Jeremy Y.
Hanna, Christina
Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title_full Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title_fullStr Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title_short Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
title_sort headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ngjeremyy headacheandmigraineclinicalpracticeguidelinesasystematicreviewandassessmentofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinerecommendations
AT hannachristina headacheandmigraineclinicalpracticeguidelinesasystematicreviewandassessmentofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinerecommendations