Cargando…

Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the ongoing follow‐up of ReActiv8‐A clinical trial is to document the longitudinal benefits of episodic stimulation of the dorsal ramus medial branch and consequent contraction of the lumbar multifidus in patients with refractory mechanical chronic low back pain (CLBP). We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, Bruce, Deckers, Kristiaan, De Smedt, Kris, Russo, Marc, Georgius, Peter, Green, Matthew, Gulve, Ashish, van Buyten, Jean‐Pierre, Smet, Iris, Mehta, Vivek, Baranidharan, Ganesan, Rathmell, James, Gilligan, Chris, Goss, Ben, Eldabe, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13477
_version_ 1784570978560376832
author Mitchell, Bruce
Deckers, Kristiaan
De Smedt, Kris
Russo, Marc
Georgius, Peter
Green, Matthew
Gulve, Ashish
van Buyten, Jean‐Pierre
Smet, Iris
Mehta, Vivek
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Rathmell, James
Gilligan, Chris
Goss, Ben
Eldabe, Sam
author_facet Mitchell, Bruce
Deckers, Kristiaan
De Smedt, Kris
Russo, Marc
Georgius, Peter
Green, Matthew
Gulve, Ashish
van Buyten, Jean‐Pierre
Smet, Iris
Mehta, Vivek
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Rathmell, James
Gilligan, Chris
Goss, Ben
Eldabe, Sam
author_sort Mitchell, Bruce
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the ongoing follow‐up of ReActiv8‐A clinical trial is to document the longitudinal benefits of episodic stimulation of the dorsal ramus medial branch and consequent contraction of the lumbar multifidus in patients with refractory mechanical chronic low back pain (CLBP). We report the four‐year outcomes of this trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ReActiv8‐A is a prospective, single‐arm trial performed at nine sites in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Australia. Eligible patients had disabling CLBP (low back pain Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥6; Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] ≥25), no indications for spine surgery or spinal cord stimulation, and failed conventional management including at least physical therapy and medications for low back pain. Fourteen days postimplantation, stimulation parameters were programmed to elicit strong, smooth contractions of the multifidus, and participants were given instructions to activate the device for 30‐min stimulation‐sessions twice daily. Annual follow‐up through four years included collection of NRS, ODI, and European Quality of Life Score on Five Dimensions (EQ‐5D). Background on mechanisms, trial design, and one‐year outcomes were previously described. RESULTS: At baseline (N = 53) (mean ± SD) age was 44 ± 10 years; duration of back pain was 14 ± 11 years, NRS was 6.8 ± 0.8, ODI 44.9 ± 10.1, and EQ‐5D 0.434 ± 0.185. Mean improvements from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and clinically meaningful for all follow‐ups. Patients completing year 4 follow‐up, reported mean (±standard error of the mean) NRS: 3.2 ± 0.4, ODI: 23.0 ± 3.2, and EQ‐5D: 0.721 ± 0.035. Moreover, 73% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement of ≥2 points on NRS, 76% of ≥10 points on ODI, and 62.5% had a clinically meaningful improvement in both NRS and ODI and 97% were (very) satisfied with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with disabling intractable CLBP who receive long‐term restorative neurostimulation, treatment satisfaction remains high and improvements in pain, disability, and quality‐of‐life are clinically meaningful and durable through four years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8456956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84569562021-09-27 Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Mitchell, Bruce Deckers, Kristiaan De Smedt, Kris Russo, Marc Georgius, Peter Green, Matthew Gulve, Ashish van Buyten, Jean‐Pierre Smet, Iris Mehta, Vivek Baranidharan, Ganesan Rathmell, James Gilligan, Chris Goss, Ben Eldabe, Sam Neuromodulation PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the ongoing follow‐up of ReActiv8‐A clinical trial is to document the longitudinal benefits of episodic stimulation of the dorsal ramus medial branch and consequent contraction of the lumbar multifidus in patients with refractory mechanical chronic low back pain (CLBP). We report the four‐year outcomes of this trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ReActiv8‐A is a prospective, single‐arm trial performed at nine sites in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Australia. Eligible patients had disabling CLBP (low back pain Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥6; Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] ≥25), no indications for spine surgery or spinal cord stimulation, and failed conventional management including at least physical therapy and medications for low back pain. Fourteen days postimplantation, stimulation parameters were programmed to elicit strong, smooth contractions of the multifidus, and participants were given instructions to activate the device for 30‐min stimulation‐sessions twice daily. Annual follow‐up through four years included collection of NRS, ODI, and European Quality of Life Score on Five Dimensions (EQ‐5D). Background on mechanisms, trial design, and one‐year outcomes were previously described. RESULTS: At baseline (N = 53) (mean ± SD) age was 44 ± 10 years; duration of back pain was 14 ± 11 years, NRS was 6.8 ± 0.8, ODI 44.9 ± 10.1, and EQ‐5D 0.434 ± 0.185. Mean improvements from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and clinically meaningful for all follow‐ups. Patients completing year 4 follow‐up, reported mean (±standard error of the mean) NRS: 3.2 ± 0.4, ODI: 23.0 ± 3.2, and EQ‐5D: 0.721 ± 0.035. Moreover, 73% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement of ≥2 points on NRS, 76% of ≥10 points on ODI, and 62.5% had a clinically meaningful improvement in both NRS and ODI and 97% were (very) satisfied with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with disabling intractable CLBP who receive long‐term restorative neurostimulation, treatment satisfaction remains high and improvements in pain, disability, and quality‐of‐life are clinically meaningful and durable through four years. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-07-09 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8456956/ /pubmed/34242440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13477 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION
Mitchell, Bruce
Deckers, Kristiaan
De Smedt, Kris
Russo, Marc
Georgius, Peter
Green, Matthew
Gulve, Ashish
van Buyten, Jean‐Pierre
Smet, Iris
Mehta, Vivek
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Rathmell, James
Gilligan, Chris
Goss, Ben
Eldabe, Sam
Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort durability of the therapeutic effect of restorative neurostimulation for refractory chronic low back pain
topic PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13477
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellbruce durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT deckerskristiaan durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT desmedtkris durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT russomarc durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT georgiuspeter durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT greenmatthew durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT gulveashish durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT vanbuytenjeanpierre durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT smetiris durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT mehtavivek durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT baranidharanganesan durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT rathmelljames durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT gilliganchris durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT gossben durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain
AT eldabesam durabilityofthetherapeuticeffectofrestorativeneurostimulationforrefractorychroniclowbackpain