Cargando…

Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe

PURPOSE: This post‐authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non‐dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortuny, Joan, von Gersdorff, Gero, Lassalle, Régis, Linder, Marie, Overbeek, Jetty, Reinold, Jonas, Toft, Gunnar, Timmer, Antje, Dress, Jochen, Blin, Patrick, Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile, Ehrenstein, Vera, Franzoni, Carla, Herings, Ron, Kollhorst, Bianca, Moore, Nicholas, Odsbu, Ingvild, Perez‐Gutthann, Susana, Schink, Tania, Rascher, Katherine, Rasouliyan, Lawrence, Rothman, Kenneth J., Saigi‐Morgui, Nuria, Schaller, Mathias, Smits, Elisabeth, Forstner, Michael, Bénichou, Jacques, Bircher, Andreas J., Garbe, Edeltraut, Rampton, David S., Gutierrez, Lia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319
_version_ 1784571003286847488
author Fortuny, Joan
von Gersdorff, Gero
Lassalle, Régis
Linder, Marie
Overbeek, Jetty
Reinold, Jonas
Toft, Gunnar
Timmer, Antje
Dress, Jochen
Blin, Patrick
Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile
Ehrenstein, Vera
Franzoni, Carla
Herings, Ron
Kollhorst, Bianca
Moore, Nicholas
Odsbu, Ingvild
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Schink, Tania
Rascher, Katherine
Rasouliyan, Lawrence
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Saigi‐Morgui, Nuria
Schaller, Mathias
Smits, Elisabeth
Forstner, Michael
Bénichou, Jacques
Bircher, Andreas J.
Garbe, Edeltraut
Rampton, David S.
Gutierrez, Lia
author_facet Fortuny, Joan
von Gersdorff, Gero
Lassalle, Régis
Linder, Marie
Overbeek, Jetty
Reinold, Jonas
Toft, Gunnar
Timmer, Antje
Dress, Jochen
Blin, Patrick
Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile
Ehrenstein, Vera
Franzoni, Carla
Herings, Ron
Kollhorst, Bianca
Moore, Nicholas
Odsbu, Ingvild
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Schink, Tania
Rascher, Katherine
Rasouliyan, Lawrence
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Saigi‐Morgui, Nuria
Schaller, Mathias
Smits, Elisabeth
Forstner, Michael
Bénichou, Jacques
Bircher, Andreas J.
Garbe, Edeltraut
Rampton, David S.
Gutierrez, Lia
author_sort Fortuny, Joan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This post‐authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non‐dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. METHODS: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. RESULTS: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). CONCLUSION: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non‐dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84570742021-09-27 Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe Fortuny, Joan von Gersdorff, Gero Lassalle, Régis Linder, Marie Overbeek, Jetty Reinold, Jonas Toft, Gunnar Timmer, Antje Dress, Jochen Blin, Patrick Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile Ehrenstein, Vera Franzoni, Carla Herings, Ron Kollhorst, Bianca Moore, Nicholas Odsbu, Ingvild Perez‐Gutthann, Susana Schink, Tania Rascher, Katherine Rasouliyan, Lawrence Rothman, Kenneth J. Saigi‐Morgui, Nuria Schaller, Mathias Smits, Elisabeth Forstner, Michael Bénichou, Jacques Bircher, Andreas J. Garbe, Edeltraut Rampton, David S. Gutierrez, Lia Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Articles PURPOSE: This post‐authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non‐dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. METHODS: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. RESULTS: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). CONCLUSION: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non‐dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-07-12 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8457074/ /pubmed/34181291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319 Text en © 2021 Vifor (International) AG. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fortuny, Joan
von Gersdorff, Gero
Lassalle, Régis
Linder, Marie
Overbeek, Jetty
Reinold, Jonas
Toft, Gunnar
Timmer, Antje
Dress, Jochen
Blin, Patrick
Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile
Ehrenstein, Vera
Franzoni, Carla
Herings, Ron
Kollhorst, Bianca
Moore, Nicholas
Odsbu, Ingvild
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Schink, Tania
Rascher, Katherine
Rasouliyan, Lawrence
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Saigi‐Morgui, Nuria
Schaller, Mathias
Smits, Elisabeth
Forstner, Michael
Bénichou, Jacques
Bircher, Andreas J.
Garbe, Edeltraut
Rampton, David S.
Gutierrez, Lia
Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title_full Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title_fullStr Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title_short Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in Europe
title_sort use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: a multinational observational post‐authorisation safety study in europe
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319
work_keys_str_mv AT fortunyjoan useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT vongersdorffgero useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT lassalleregis useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT lindermarie useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT overbeekjetty useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT reinoldjonas useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT toftgunnar useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT timmerantje useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT dressjochen useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT blinpatrick useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT drozperroteaucecile useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT ehrensteinvera useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT franzonicarla useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT heringsron useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT kollhorstbianca useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT moorenicholas useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT odsbuingvild useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT perezgutthannsusana useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT schinktania useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT rascherkatherine useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT rasouliyanlawrence useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT rothmankennethj useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT saigimorguinuria useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT schallermathias useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT smitselisabeth useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT forstnermichael useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT benichoujacques useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT bircherandreasj useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT garbeedeltraut useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT ramptondavids useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope
AT gutierrezlia useofintravenousironandriskofanaphylaxisamultinationalobservationalpostauthorisationsafetystudyineurope