Digital tracheal intubation and finger palpation to confirm endotracheal tube tip position in neonates: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: To evaluate digital tracheal intubation (DTI) when compared to laryngoscope‐assisted TI; finger palpation of endotracheal tube (ETT) tip position when compared to any standard method. DESIGN: A systematic review of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL with synthesis of data using meta‐analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of successful TI and correct ETT tip positioning were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Five studies (one observational study and four RCTs) enrolling 310 neonates were included. 94% (81%–98%) of the DTI were successful on the first attempt (certainty of evidence [CoE]: low). The proportion of successful intubation on the first attempt was higher with DTI when compared to laryngoscope‐assisted TI (RR 95% CI: 1.81 [1.18; 2.76]) (CoE: very low). Time to successful TI with DTI was 7.4 (95% CI: 6.3, 8.5) s (CoE: low). Time to successful TI was significantly shorter with DTI when compared to laryngoscope assisted TI (MD [95% CI]: −4.9 [−7.3, −2.4] s) (CoE: very low). There was a trend towards a higher proportion of correct ETT tip positions with finger palpation when compared to weight‐based formulae alone (RR 95% CI: 1.12 [0.96; 1.31]) (CoE: very low). CONCLUSIONS: DTI and finger palpation to ascertain ETT tip position in neonates are promising strategies. Future studies with emphasis on their learning trajectory and generalizability are needed.