Cargando…

Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters

The release of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to the environment necessitates an assessment of their environmental risks. The currently available environmental risk assessments (ERA) for ENMs are based on an analysis of the total flows of a specific ENM to the environment and on ecotoxicity studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Hyunjoo, Adam, Véronique, Nowack, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34171135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5146
_version_ 1784571008715325440
author Hong, Hyunjoo
Adam, Véronique
Nowack, Bernd
author_facet Hong, Hyunjoo
Adam, Véronique
Nowack, Bernd
author_sort Hong, Hyunjoo
collection PubMed
description The release of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to the environment necessitates an assessment of their environmental risks. The currently available environmental risk assessments (ERA) for ENMs are based on an analysis of the total flows of a specific ENM to the environment and on ecotoxicity studies performed with pristine ENMs. It is known that ENMs undergo transformation during product use and release and in technical systems such as wastewater treatment. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform an ERA of 3 ENMs (nano‐Ag, nano‐TiO(2), and nano‐ZnO) based on a form‐specific release model and a form‐specific analysis of ecotoxicological data. Predicted environmental concentration values were derived using a form‐specific material flow model. Species sensitivity distributions were used to derive predicted‐no‐effect concentrations (PNECs) for the pristine ENMs and for dissolved and transformed Ag and ZnO. For all ENMs, the matrix‐embedded form was included in the assessment. A probabilistic assessment was applied, yielding final probability distributions for the risk characterization ratio (RCR). For nano‐Ag, the form‐specific assessment resulted in a decrease of the mean RCR from 0.061 for the approach neglecting the different release forms to 0.034 because of the much lower PNEC of transformed Ag. Likewise, for nano‐ZnO, the form‐specific approach reduced the mean RCR from 1.2 to 0.86. For nano‐TiO(2), the form‐specific assessment did not change the mean RCR of 0.026. This analysis shows that a form‐specific approach can have an influence on the assessment of the environmental risks of ENMs and that, given the availability of form‐specific release models, an updated ERA for ENMs can be performed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:2629–2639. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84570942021-09-27 Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters Hong, Hyunjoo Adam, Véronique Nowack, Bernd Environ Toxicol Chem Hazard/Risk Assessment The release of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to the environment necessitates an assessment of their environmental risks. The currently available environmental risk assessments (ERA) for ENMs are based on an analysis of the total flows of a specific ENM to the environment and on ecotoxicity studies performed with pristine ENMs. It is known that ENMs undergo transformation during product use and release and in technical systems such as wastewater treatment. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform an ERA of 3 ENMs (nano‐Ag, nano‐TiO(2), and nano‐ZnO) based on a form‐specific release model and a form‐specific analysis of ecotoxicological data. Predicted environmental concentration values were derived using a form‐specific material flow model. Species sensitivity distributions were used to derive predicted‐no‐effect concentrations (PNECs) for the pristine ENMs and for dissolved and transformed Ag and ZnO. For all ENMs, the matrix‐embedded form was included in the assessment. A probabilistic assessment was applied, yielding final probability distributions for the risk characterization ratio (RCR). For nano‐Ag, the form‐specific assessment resulted in a decrease of the mean RCR from 0.061 for the approach neglecting the different release forms to 0.034 because of the much lower PNEC of transformed Ag. Likewise, for nano‐ZnO, the form‐specific approach reduced the mean RCR from 1.2 to 0.86. For nano‐TiO(2), the form‐specific assessment did not change the mean RCR of 0.026. This analysis shows that a form‐specific approach can have an influence on the assessment of the environmental risks of ENMs and that, given the availability of form‐specific release models, an updated ERA for ENMs can be performed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:2629–2639. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-04 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8457094/ /pubmed/34171135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5146 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hazard/Risk Assessment
Hong, Hyunjoo
Adam, Véronique
Nowack, Bernd
Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title_full Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title_fullStr Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title_full_unstemmed Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title_short Form‐Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano‐Ag, Nano‐TiO(2), and Nano‐ZnO) in European Freshwaters
title_sort form‐specific and probabilistic environmental risk assessment of 3 engineered nanomaterials (nano‐ag, nano‐tio(2), and nano‐zno) in european freshwaters
topic Hazard/Risk Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34171135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5146
work_keys_str_mv AT honghyunjoo formspecificandprobabilisticenvironmentalriskassessmentof3engineerednanomaterialsnanoagnanotio2andnanoznoineuropeanfreshwaters
AT adamveronique formspecificandprobabilisticenvironmentalriskassessmentof3engineerednanomaterialsnanoagnanotio2andnanoznoineuropeanfreshwaters
AT nowackbernd formspecificandprobabilisticenvironmentalriskassessmentof3engineerednanomaterialsnanoagnanotio2andnanoznoineuropeanfreshwaters