Cargando…

Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study

AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polymeri, Angeliki, van der Horst, Joyce, Buijs, Mark J., Zaura, Egija, Wismeijer, Daniel, Crielaard, Wim, Loos, Bruno G., Laine, Marja L., Brandt, Bernd W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502
_version_ 1784571027160825856
author Polymeri, Angeliki
van der Horst, Joyce
Buijs, Mark J.
Zaura, Egija
Wismeijer, Daniel
Crielaard, Wim
Loos, Bruno G.
Laine, Marja L.
Brandt, Bernd W.
author_facet Polymeri, Angeliki
van der Horst, Joyce
Buijs, Mark J.
Zaura, Egija
Wismeijer, Daniel
Crielaard, Wim
Loos, Bruno G.
Laine, Marja L.
Brandt, Bernd W.
author_sort Polymeri, Angeliki
collection PubMed
description AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples were collected from the deepest peri‐implant site of 41 patients with paper points, and analysed using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. RESULTS: We observed differences in microbial profiles by PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status. Microbiota in deep pockets included higher proportions of the genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Anaeroglobus compared with shallow pockets that harboured more Rothia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus. Peri‐implantitis (PI) sites were dominated by Fusobacterium and Treponema compared with healthy implants and peri‐implant mucositis, which were mostly colonized by Rothia and Streptococcus. Partially edentulous (PE) individuals presented more Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Rothia, whereas fully edentulous individuals presented more Veillonella and Streptococcus. CONCLUSIONS: PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status may affect the submucosal ecology leading to variation in composition of the microbiome. Deep pockets, PI, and PE individuals were dominated by Gram‐negative anaerobic taxa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84571662021-09-27 Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study Polymeri, Angeliki van der Horst, Joyce Buijs, Mark J. Zaura, Egija Wismeijer, Daniel Crielaard, Wim Loos, Bruno G. Laine, Marja L. Brandt, Bernd W. J Clin Periodontol Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples were collected from the deepest peri‐implant site of 41 patients with paper points, and analysed using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. RESULTS: We observed differences in microbial profiles by PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status. Microbiota in deep pockets included higher proportions of the genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Anaeroglobus compared with shallow pockets that harboured more Rothia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus. Peri‐implantitis (PI) sites were dominated by Fusobacterium and Treponema compared with healthy implants and peri‐implant mucositis, which were mostly colonized by Rothia and Streptococcus. Partially edentulous (PE) individuals presented more Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Rothia, whereas fully edentulous individuals presented more Veillonella and Streptococcus. CONCLUSIONS: PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status may affect the submucosal ecology leading to variation in composition of the microbiome. Deep pockets, PI, and PE individuals were dominated by Gram‐negative anaerobic taxa. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-07-14 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8457166/ /pubmed/34101220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities
Polymeri, Angeliki
van der Horst, Joyce
Buijs, Mark J.
Zaura, Egija
Wismeijer, Daniel
Crielaard, Wim
Loos, Bruno G.
Laine, Marja L.
Brandt, Bernd W.
Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: a cross‐sectional study
topic Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502
work_keys_str_mv AT polymeriangeliki submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT vanderhorstjoyce submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT buijsmarkj submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT zauraegija submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT wismeijerdaniel submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT crielaardwim submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT loosbrunog submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT lainemarjal submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy
AT brandtberndw submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy