Cargando…
Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study
AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502 |
_version_ | 1784571027160825856 |
---|---|
author | Polymeri, Angeliki van der Horst, Joyce Buijs, Mark J. Zaura, Egija Wismeijer, Daniel Crielaard, Wim Loos, Bruno G. Laine, Marja L. Brandt, Bernd W. |
author_facet | Polymeri, Angeliki van der Horst, Joyce Buijs, Mark J. Zaura, Egija Wismeijer, Daniel Crielaard, Wim Loos, Bruno G. Laine, Marja L. Brandt, Bernd W. |
author_sort | Polymeri, Angeliki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples were collected from the deepest peri‐implant site of 41 patients with paper points, and analysed using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. RESULTS: We observed differences in microbial profiles by PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status. Microbiota in deep pockets included higher proportions of the genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Anaeroglobus compared with shallow pockets that harboured more Rothia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus. Peri‐implantitis (PI) sites were dominated by Fusobacterium and Treponema compared with healthy implants and peri‐implant mucositis, which were mostly colonized by Rothia and Streptococcus. Partially edentulous (PE) individuals presented more Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Rothia, whereas fully edentulous individuals presented more Veillonella and Streptococcus. CONCLUSIONS: PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status may affect the submucosal ecology leading to variation in composition of the microbiome. Deep pockets, PI, and PE individuals were dominated by Gram‐negative anaerobic taxa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8457166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84571662021-09-27 Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study Polymeri, Angeliki van der Horst, Joyce Buijs, Mark J. Zaura, Egija Wismeijer, Daniel Crielaard, Wim Loos, Bruno G. Laine, Marja L. Brandt, Bernd W. J Clin Periodontol Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities AIM: To study the peri‐implant submucosal microbiome in relation to implant disease status, dentition status, smoking habit, gender, implant location, implant system, time of functional loading, probing pocket depth (PPD), and presence of bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofilm samples were collected from the deepest peri‐implant site of 41 patients with paper points, and analysed using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. RESULTS: We observed differences in microbial profiles by PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status. Microbiota in deep pockets included higher proportions of the genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Anaeroglobus compared with shallow pockets that harboured more Rothia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus. Peri‐implantitis (PI) sites were dominated by Fusobacterium and Treponema compared with healthy implants and peri‐implant mucositis, which were mostly colonized by Rothia and Streptococcus. Partially edentulous (PE) individuals presented more Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Rothia, whereas fully edentulous individuals presented more Veillonella and Streptococcus. CONCLUSIONS: PPD, implant disease status, and dentition status may affect the submucosal ecology leading to variation in composition of the microbiome. Deep pockets, PI, and PE individuals were dominated by Gram‐negative anaerobic taxa. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-07-14 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8457166/ /pubmed/34101220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities Polymeri, Angeliki van der Horst, Joyce Buijs, Mark J. Zaura, Egija Wismeijer, Daniel Crielaard, Wim Loos, Bruno G. Laine, Marja L. Brandt, Bernd W. Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title | Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title_full | Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title_fullStr | Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title_short | Submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: A cross‐sectional study |
title_sort | submucosal microbiome of peri‐implant sites: a cross‐sectional study |
topic | Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polymeriangeliki submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT vanderhorstjoyce submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT buijsmarkj submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT zauraegija submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT wismeijerdaniel submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT crielaardwim submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT loosbrunog submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT lainemarjal submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy AT brandtberndw submucosalmicrobiomeofperiimplantsitesacrosssectionalstudy |