Cargando…

Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy‐five patients requiring single tooth extra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonker, Brend P., Strauss, Franz J., Naenni, Nadja, Jung, Ronald E., Wolvius, Eppo B., Pijpe, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13796
_version_ 1784571028584792064
author Jonker, Brend P.
Strauss, Franz J.
Naenni, Nadja
Jung, Ronald E.
Wolvius, Eppo B.
Pijpe, Justin
author_facet Jonker, Brend P.
Strauss, Franz J.
Naenni, Nadja
Jung, Ronald E.
Wolvius, Eppo B.
Pijpe, Justin
author_sort Jonker, Brend P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy‐five patients requiring single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b) ARP using DBBM‐C covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs were evaluated one year post‐loading. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were available for re‐examination at one year post‐loading. The median mid‐facial mucosal margin change amounted to −0.02 mm (IQR −0.27–0.46) in the CM group, −0.13 mm (IQR −0.44–0.25) in the PG group and −0.14 mm (IQR −0.29–0.07) in the control group, with no significant differences between the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5 in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84571702021-09-27 Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial Jonker, Brend P. Strauss, Franz J. Naenni, Nadja Jung, Ronald E. Wolvius, Eppo B. Pijpe, Justin Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy‐five patients requiring single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b) ARP using DBBM‐C covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs were evaluated one year post‐loading. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were available for re‐examination at one year post‐loading. The median mid‐facial mucosal margin change amounted to −0.02 mm (IQR −0.27–0.46) in the CM group, −0.13 mm (IQR −0.44–0.25) in the PG group and −0.14 mm (IQR −0.29–0.07) in the control group, with no significant differences between the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5 in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-03 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8457170/ /pubmed/34129708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13796 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jonker, Brend P.
Strauss, Franz J.
Naenni, Nadja
Jung, Ronald E.
Wolvius, Eppo B.
Pijpe, Justin
Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title_full Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title_short Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: One‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
title_sort early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient‐reported outcome measures: one‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13796
work_keys_str_mv AT jonkerbrendp earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT straussfranzj earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT naenninadja earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jungronalde earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wolviuseppob earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pijpejustin earlyimplantplacementwithorwithoutalveolarridgepreservationinsingletoothgapsrenderssimilarestheticclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresoneyearresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial