Cargando…

Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tugin, Sergei, Souza, Victor H., Nazarova, Maria A., Novikov, Pavel A., Tervo, Aino E., Nieminen, Jaakko O., Lioumis, Pantelis, Ziemann, Ulf, Nikulin, Vadim V., Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257554
_version_ 1784571111470530560
author Tugin, Sergei
Souza, Victor H.
Nazarova, Maria A.
Novikov, Pavel A.
Tervo, Aino E.
Nieminen, Jaakko O.
Lioumis, Pantelis
Ziemann, Ulf
Nikulin, Vadim V.
Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
author_facet Tugin, Sergei
Souza, Victor H.
Nazarova, Maria A.
Novikov, Pavel A.
Tervo, Aino E.
Nieminen, Jaakko O.
Lioumis, Pantelis
Ziemann, Ulf
Nikulin, Vadim V.
Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
author_sort Tugin, Sergei
collection PubMed
description Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84575002021-09-23 Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study Tugin, Sergei Souza, Victor H. Nazarova, Maria A. Novikov, Pavel A. Tervo, Aino E. Nieminen, Jaakko O. Lioumis, Pantelis Ziemann, Ulf Nikulin, Vadim V. Ilmoniemi, Risto J. PLoS One Research Article Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations. Public Library of Science 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8457500/ /pubmed/34550997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257554 Text en © 2021 Tugin et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tugin, Sergei
Souza, Victor H.
Nazarova, Maria A.
Novikov, Pavel A.
Tervo, Aino E.
Nieminen, Jaakko O.
Lioumis, Pantelis
Ziemann, Ulf
Nikulin, Vadim V.
Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title_full Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title_fullStr Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title_short Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
title_sort effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (sici) and facilitation (sicf): a multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257554
work_keys_str_mv AT tuginsergei effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT souzavictorh effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT nazarovamariaa effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT novikovpavela effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT tervoainoe effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT nieminenjaakkoo effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT lioumispantelis effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT ziemannulf effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT nikulinvadimv effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy
AT ilmoniemiristoj effectofstimulusorientationandintensityonshortintervalintracorticalinhibitionsiciandfacilitationsicfamultichanneltranscranialmagneticstimulationstudy