Cargando…
Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era
Evaluating the aerosolization of droplets from surgical instruments to assess the implications of surgery in SARS-CoV-2 transmission for both patients and providers. Cadaver study. Outpatient surgery center. Aerosolized particles between 0.3 and 25 microns were measured. Instruments tested included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02872-7 |
_version_ | 1784571117730529280 |
---|---|
author | Low, Garren M. I. LeConte, Bailey Eguia, Arturo A. Kim, Ashley Karni, Ron J. Luong, Amber U. Jain, Kunal S. |
author_facet | Low, Garren M. I. LeConte, Bailey Eguia, Arturo A. Kim, Ashley Karni, Ron J. Luong, Amber U. Jain, Kunal S. |
author_sort | Low, Garren M. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evaluating the aerosolization of droplets from surgical instruments to assess the implications of surgery in SARS-CoV-2 transmission for both patients and providers. Cadaver study. Outpatient surgery center. Aerosolized particles between 0.3 and 25 microns were measured. Instruments tested included monopolar cautery with and without suction, bipolar cautery, a bipolar vessel sealing device, and tissue scissors. Each trial was compared to a background reading. Monopolar cautery without suction, Ligasure used continuously and Bipolar cautery produced the most aerosols. Monopolar cautery with simultaneous suction produced no detectable aerosols. Ligasure used for a single cycle produced notably fewer aerosols than during continuous use. Most aerosols produced were < 5 microns. These data support n95 use during surgical management of the upper aerodigestive tract, as well as the use of suction in the surgical field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8457543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84575432021-09-23 Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era Low, Garren M. I. LeConte, Bailey Eguia, Arturo A. Kim, Ashley Karni, Ron J. Luong, Amber U. Jain, Kunal S. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Article Evaluating the aerosolization of droplets from surgical instruments to assess the implications of surgery in SARS-CoV-2 transmission for both patients and providers. Cadaver study. Outpatient surgery center. Aerosolized particles between 0.3 and 25 microns were measured. Instruments tested included monopolar cautery with and without suction, bipolar cautery, a bipolar vessel sealing device, and tissue scissors. Each trial was compared to a background reading. Monopolar cautery without suction, Ligasure used continuously and Bipolar cautery produced the most aerosols. Monopolar cautery with simultaneous suction produced no detectable aerosols. Ligasure used for a single cycle produced notably fewer aerosols than during continuous use. Most aerosols produced were < 5 microns. These data support n95 use during surgical management of the upper aerodigestive tract, as well as the use of suction in the surgical field. Springer India 2021-09-22 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8457543/ /pubmed/34580631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02872-7 Text en © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Low, Garren M. I. LeConte, Bailey Eguia, Arturo A. Kim, Ashley Karni, Ron J. Luong, Amber U. Jain, Kunal S. Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title | Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title_full | Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title_fullStr | Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title_short | Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era |
title_sort | aerosol production with surgical instrumentation: implications for head and neck surgery in the covid-19 era |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02872-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowgarrenmi aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT lecontebailey aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT eguiaarturoa aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT kimashley aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT karnironj aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT luongamberu aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era AT jainkunals aerosolproductionwithsurgicalinstrumentationimplicationsforheadandnecksurgeryinthecovid19era |