Cargando…
A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766 |
_version_ | 1784571157853241344 |
---|---|
author | Cochran, Meagan East, Kelly Greve, Veronica Kelly, Melissa Kelley, Whitley Moore, Troy Myers, Richard M. Odom, Katherine Schroeder, Molly C. Bick, David |
author_facet | Cochran, Meagan East, Kelly Greve, Veronica Kelly, Melissa Kelley, Whitley Moore, Troy Myers, Richard M. Odom, Katherine Schroeder, Molly C. Bick, David |
author_sort | Cochran, Meagan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabama. METHODS: Individuals seeking elective genomic testing and pharmacogenetic testing were recruited through a private genomics clinic in Huntsville, AL. Individuals underwent clinical genome sequencing with a separate pharmacogenetic testing panel. RESULTS: Six participants (11.5%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that may explain one or more aspects of their medical history. Ten participants (19%) had variants that altered the risk of disease in the future, including two individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Forty‐four participants (85%) were carriers of a recessive or X‐linked disorder. All individuals with pharmacogenetic testing had variants that affected current and/or future medications. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of collecting detailed phenotype information to interpret results in elective GS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8457704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84577042021-09-27 A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population Cochran, Meagan East, Kelly Greve, Veronica Kelly, Melissa Kelley, Whitley Moore, Troy Myers, Richard M. Odom, Katherine Schroeder, Molly C. Bick, David Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabama. METHODS: Individuals seeking elective genomic testing and pharmacogenetic testing were recruited through a private genomics clinic in Huntsville, AL. Individuals underwent clinical genome sequencing with a separate pharmacogenetic testing panel. RESULTS: Six participants (11.5%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that may explain one or more aspects of their medical history. Ten participants (19%) had variants that altered the risk of disease in the future, including two individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Forty‐four participants (85%) were carriers of a recessive or X‐linked disorder. All individuals with pharmacogenetic testing had variants that affected current and/or future medications. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of collecting detailed phenotype information to interpret results in elective GS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8457704/ /pubmed/34313030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cochran, Meagan East, Kelly Greve, Veronica Kelly, Melissa Kelley, Whitley Moore, Troy Myers, Richard M. Odom, Katherine Schroeder, Molly C. Bick, David A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title | A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title_full | A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title_fullStr | A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title_full_unstemmed | A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title_short | A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
title_sort | study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cochranmeagan astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT eastkelly astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT greveveronica astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT kellymelissa astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT kelleywhitley astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT mooretroy astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT myersrichardm astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT odomkatherine astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT schroedermollyc astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT bickdavid astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT cochranmeagan studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT eastkelly studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT greveveronica studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT kellymelissa studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT kelleywhitley studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT mooretroy studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT myersrichardm studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT odomkatherine studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT schroedermollyc studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation AT bickdavid studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation |