Cargando…

A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population

BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cochran, Meagan, East, Kelly, Greve, Veronica, Kelly, Melissa, Kelley, Whitley, Moore, Troy, Myers, Richard M., Odom, Katherine, Schroeder, Molly C., Bick, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766
_version_ 1784571157853241344
author Cochran, Meagan
East, Kelly
Greve, Veronica
Kelly, Melissa
Kelley, Whitley
Moore, Troy
Myers, Richard M.
Odom, Katherine
Schroeder, Molly C.
Bick, David
author_facet Cochran, Meagan
East, Kelly
Greve, Veronica
Kelly, Melissa
Kelley, Whitley
Moore, Troy
Myers, Richard M.
Odom, Katherine
Schroeder, Molly C.
Bick, David
author_sort Cochran, Meagan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabama. METHODS: Individuals seeking elective genomic testing and pharmacogenetic testing were recruited through a private genomics clinic in Huntsville, AL. Individuals underwent clinical genome sequencing with a separate pharmacogenetic testing panel. RESULTS: Six participants (11.5%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that may explain one or more aspects of their medical history. Ten participants (19%) had variants that altered the risk of disease in the future, including two individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Forty‐four participants (85%) were carriers of a recessive or X‐linked disorder. All individuals with pharmacogenetic testing had variants that affected current and/or future medications. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of collecting detailed phenotype information to interpret results in elective GS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8457704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84577042021-09-27 A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population Cochran, Meagan East, Kelly Greve, Veronica Kelly, Melissa Kelley, Whitley Moore, Troy Myers, Richard M. Odom, Katherine Schroeder, Molly C. Bick, David Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing (GS) of individuals without a medical indication, known as elective GS, is now available at a number of centers around the United States. Here we report the results of elective GS and pharmacogenetic panel testing in 52 individuals at a private genomics clinic in Alabama. METHODS: Individuals seeking elective genomic testing and pharmacogenetic testing were recruited through a private genomics clinic in Huntsville, AL. Individuals underwent clinical genome sequencing with a separate pharmacogenetic testing panel. RESULTS: Six participants (11.5%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that may explain one or more aspects of their medical history. Ten participants (19%) had variants that altered the risk of disease in the future, including two individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Forty‐four participants (85%) were carriers of a recessive or X‐linked disorder. All individuals with pharmacogenetic testing had variants that affected current and/or future medications. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of collecting detailed phenotype information to interpret results in elective GS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8457704/ /pubmed/34313030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cochran, Meagan
East, Kelly
Greve, Veronica
Kelly, Melissa
Kelley, Whitley
Moore, Troy
Myers, Richard M.
Odom, Katherine
Schroeder, Molly C.
Bick, David
A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title_full A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title_fullStr A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title_full_unstemmed A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title_short A study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
title_sort study of elective genome sequencing and pharmacogenetic testing in an unselected population
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8457704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1766
work_keys_str_mv AT cochranmeagan astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT eastkelly astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT greveveronica astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT kellymelissa astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT kelleywhitley astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT mooretroy astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT myersrichardm astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT odomkatherine astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT schroedermollyc astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT bickdavid astudyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT cochranmeagan studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT eastkelly studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT greveveronica studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT kellymelissa studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT kelleywhitley studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT mooretroy studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT myersrichardm studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT odomkatherine studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT schroedermollyc studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation
AT bickdavid studyofelectivegenomesequencingandpharmacogenetictestinginanunselectedpopulation