Cargando…

Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: This study explored barriers and facilitators to integrating health evidence into spatial planning at local authority levels and examined the awareness and use of the Public Health England ‘Spatial Planning for Health’ resource. METHODS: A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design util...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ige-Elegbede, Janet, Pilkington, Paul, Bird, Emma L, Gray, Selena, Mindell, Jennifer S, Chang, Michael, Stimpson, Aimee, Gallagher, Dominic, Petrokofsky, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa055
_version_ 1784571232693256192
author Ige-Elegbede, Janet
Pilkington, Paul
Bird, Emma L
Gray, Selena
Mindell, Jennifer S
Chang, Michael
Stimpson, Aimee
Gallagher, Dominic
Petrokofsky, Carl
author_facet Ige-Elegbede, Janet
Pilkington, Paul
Bird, Emma L
Gray, Selena
Mindell, Jennifer S
Chang, Michael
Stimpson, Aimee
Gallagher, Dominic
Petrokofsky, Carl
author_sort Ige-Elegbede, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explored barriers and facilitators to integrating health evidence into spatial planning at local authority levels and examined the awareness and use of the Public Health England ‘Spatial Planning for Health’ resource. METHODS: A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design utilized in-depth semi-structured interviews followed by an online survey of public health, planning and other built environment professionals in England. RESULTS: Views from 19 individuals and 162 survey responses revealed high awareness and use of the Spatial Planning for Health resource, although public health professionals reported greater awareness and use than other professionals. Key barriers to evidence implementation included differences in interpretation and the use of ‘evidence’ between public health and planning professionals, lack of practical evidence to apply locally and lack of resource and staff capacity in local authorities. Key facilitators included integrating health into the design of local plans, articulating wider benefits to multiple stakeholders and simplifying presenting evidence (regarding language and accessibility). CONCLUSION: The Spatial Planning for Health resource is a useful resource at local authority level. Further work is needed to maximize its use by built environment professionals. Public health teams need support, capacity and skills to ensure that local health and well-being priorities are integrated into local planning documents and decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84580172021-09-23 Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study Ige-Elegbede, Janet Pilkington, Paul Bird, Emma L Gray, Selena Mindell, Jennifer S Chang, Michael Stimpson, Aimee Gallagher, Dominic Petrokofsky, Carl J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: This study explored barriers and facilitators to integrating health evidence into spatial planning at local authority levels and examined the awareness and use of the Public Health England ‘Spatial Planning for Health’ resource. METHODS: A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design utilized in-depth semi-structured interviews followed by an online survey of public health, planning and other built environment professionals in England. RESULTS: Views from 19 individuals and 162 survey responses revealed high awareness and use of the Spatial Planning for Health resource, although public health professionals reported greater awareness and use than other professionals. Key barriers to evidence implementation included differences in interpretation and the use of ‘evidence’ between public health and planning professionals, lack of practical evidence to apply locally and lack of resource and staff capacity in local authorities. Key facilitators included integrating health into the design of local plans, articulating wider benefits to multiple stakeholders and simplifying presenting evidence (regarding language and accessibility). CONCLUSION: The Spatial Planning for Health resource is a useful resource at local authority level. Further work is needed to maximize its use by built environment professionals. Public health teams need support, capacity and skills to ensure that local health and well-being priorities are integrated into local planning documents and decisions. Oxford University Press 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8458017/ /pubmed/32424415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa055 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ige-Elegbede, Janet
Pilkington, Paul
Bird, Emma L
Gray, Selena
Mindell, Jennifer S
Chang, Michael
Stimpson, Aimee
Gallagher, Dominic
Petrokofsky, Carl
Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title_full Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title_short Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
title_sort exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in england: a mixed-methods study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa055
work_keys_str_mv AT igeelegbedejanet exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT pilkingtonpaul exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT birdemmal exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT grayselena exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT mindelljennifers exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT changmichael exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT stimpsonaimee exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT gallagherdominic exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy
AT petrokofskycarl exploringtheviewsofplannersandpublichealthpractitionersonintegratinghealthevidenceintospatialplanninginenglandamixedmethodsstudy