Cargando…

Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patricios, Jon, Kemp, Joanne, Thornton, Jane S, Drezner, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104126
_version_ 1784571242587619328
author Patricios, Jon
Kemp, Joanne
Thornton, Jane S
Drezner, Jonathan
author_facet Patricios, Jon
Kemp, Joanne
Thornton, Jane S
Drezner, Jonathan
author_sort Patricios, Jon
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84580632021-10-07 Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science Patricios, Jon Kemp, Joanne Thornton, Jane S Drezner, Jonathan Br J Sports Med Editorial BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8458063/ /pubmed/33753344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104126 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Editorial
Patricios, Jon
Kemp, Joanne
Thornton, Jane S
Drezner, Jonathan
Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title_full Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title_fullStr Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title_full_unstemmed Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title_short Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
title_sort nuisance or necessity? why robust peer review is critical for medical science
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104126
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciosjon nuisanceornecessitywhyrobustpeerreviewiscriticalformedicalscience
AT kempjoanne nuisanceornecessitywhyrobustpeerreviewiscriticalformedicalscience
AT thorntonjanes nuisanceornecessitywhyrobustpeerreviewiscriticalformedicalscience
AT dreznerjonathan nuisanceornecessitywhyrobustpeerreviewiscriticalformedicalscience