Cargando…

The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND: Lack of awareness of the taxonomic revision from the familiar Streptococcus bovis to the less familiar Streptococcus gallolyticus may be associated with a decrease in recommended colon cancer screening in patients with bacteremia from this organism. This could subsequently lead to a dela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thind, Sharanjeet K, Shibib, Dena R, Gentry, Chris A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab426
_version_ 1784571267788046336
author Thind, Sharanjeet K
Shibib, Dena R
Gentry, Chris A
author_facet Thind, Sharanjeet K
Shibib, Dena R
Gentry, Chris A
author_sort Thind, Sharanjeet K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lack of awareness of the taxonomic revision from the familiar Streptococcus bovis to the less familiar Streptococcus gallolyticus may be associated with a decrease in recommended colon cancer screening in patients with bacteremia from this organism. This could subsequently lead to a delay in diagnosis or underdiagnosis of colon cancer and other serious underlying gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of this study was to determine whether the nomenclature change of S. bovis to S. gallolyticus resulted in decreased colon cancer screening. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, observational, nationwide analysis of patients who had positive blood cultures for S. bovis/S. gallolyticus from any Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2017. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary end point of intent for colonoscopy between the S. gallolyticus and S. bovis groups (66.5% [117/176] vs 62.1% [624/1005], respectively; P = .26). The overall mortality rate was 33.8% among 1181 patients included in the study, with a significantly lower mortality in patients with evidence of intent for colonoscopy (29.6% vs 42.5%; P ≤ .001), gastroenterology (GI) consultation (29.8% vs 41.4%; P < .001), infectious diseases (ID) consultation (29.4% vs 39.0%; P = .001), or either consultation (31.9% vs 40.7%; P = .013), compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in colon cancer screening rates between patients with episodes of bacteremia reported as S. bovis and those reported as S. gallolyticus. Overall mortality was lower in patients who had ID consultation, GI consultation, or evidence of colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84582642021-09-23 The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening Thind, Sharanjeet K Shibib, Dena R Gentry, Chris A Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Lack of awareness of the taxonomic revision from the familiar Streptococcus bovis to the less familiar Streptococcus gallolyticus may be associated with a decrease in recommended colon cancer screening in patients with bacteremia from this organism. This could subsequently lead to a delay in diagnosis or underdiagnosis of colon cancer and other serious underlying gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of this study was to determine whether the nomenclature change of S. bovis to S. gallolyticus resulted in decreased colon cancer screening. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, observational, nationwide analysis of patients who had positive blood cultures for S. bovis/S. gallolyticus from any Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2017. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary end point of intent for colonoscopy between the S. gallolyticus and S. bovis groups (66.5% [117/176] vs 62.1% [624/1005], respectively; P = .26). The overall mortality rate was 33.8% among 1181 patients included in the study, with a significantly lower mortality in patients with evidence of intent for colonoscopy (29.6% vs 42.5%; P ≤ .001), gastroenterology (GI) consultation (29.8% vs 41.4%; P < .001), infectious diseases (ID) consultation (29.4% vs 39.0%; P = .001), or either consultation (31.9% vs 40.7%; P = .013), compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in colon cancer screening rates between patients with episodes of bacteremia reported as S. bovis and those reported as S. gallolyticus. Overall mortality was lower in patients who had ID consultation, GI consultation, or evidence of colonoscopy. Oxford University Press 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8458264/ /pubmed/34568510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab426 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Thind, Sharanjeet K
Shibib, Dena R
Gentry, Chris A
The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title_full The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title_fullStr The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title_short The Effect of Nomenclature Revision of Streptococcus bovis to Streptococcus gallolyticus on Subsequent Colon Cancer Screening
title_sort effect of nomenclature revision of streptococcus bovis to streptococcus gallolyticus on subsequent colon cancer screening
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab426
work_keys_str_mv AT thindsharanjeetk theeffectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening
AT shibibdenar theeffectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening
AT gentrychrisa theeffectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening
AT thindsharanjeetk effectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening
AT shibibdenar effectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening
AT gentrychrisa effectofnomenclaturerevisionofstreptococcusbovistostreptococcusgallolyticusonsubsequentcoloncancerscreening