Cargando…

An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally impacted the delivery of healthcare services globally. In line with UK government guidelines on social distancing, the use of telemedicine was implemented to facilitate the ongoing provision of cancer rehabilitation. PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brady, Grainne, Ashforth, Kate, Cowan-Dickie, Siobhan, Dewhurst, Sarah, Harris, Natalie, Monteiro, Alline, Sandsund, Catherine, Roe, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06552-8
_version_ 1784571321991036928
author Brady, Grainne
Ashforth, Kate
Cowan-Dickie, Siobhan
Dewhurst, Sarah
Harris, Natalie
Monteiro, Alline
Sandsund, Catherine
Roe, Justin
author_facet Brady, Grainne
Ashforth, Kate
Cowan-Dickie, Siobhan
Dewhurst, Sarah
Harris, Natalie
Monteiro, Alline
Sandsund, Catherine
Roe, Justin
author_sort Brady, Grainne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally impacted the delivery of healthcare services globally. In line with UK government guidelines on social distancing, the use of telemedicine was implemented to facilitate the ongoing provision of cancer rehabilitation. PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate and co-design telemedicine services to meet the complex needs of our patients and carers at a tertiary cancer centre. METHODS: Experience-based co-design methodology was adapted to include virtual methods. Staff members (n = 12) and patients (n = 11) who had delivered or received therapies services at our UK cancer centre since March 2020 were recruited to take part in one-to-one virtual interviews. Patient interviews were video recorded, analysed and edited to a 30-min “trigger film”. Patient and staff virtual events were undertaken thereafter. A joint virtual patient and staff event occurred. Staff and patients watched the trigger film and as partners, agreed areas for change and developed groups for service co-design. RESULTS: Positive aspects regarding telemedicine provision were highlighted including reduced financial and time burden on patients, and increased flexibility for both staff and patients. The key concerns included digital exclusion, safety, communication and patient choice. Four co-design groups have been established to enact changes in these priority areas. CONCLUSION: Using a participatory design approach, we have worked in partnership with patients and staff to ensure the safe, acceptable and effective delivery of rehabilitation services with integrated telemedicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84585572021-09-23 An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach Brady, Grainne Ashforth, Kate Cowan-Dickie, Siobhan Dewhurst, Sarah Harris, Natalie Monteiro, Alline Sandsund, Catherine Roe, Justin Support Care Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally impacted the delivery of healthcare services globally. In line with UK government guidelines on social distancing, the use of telemedicine was implemented to facilitate the ongoing provision of cancer rehabilitation. PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate and co-design telemedicine services to meet the complex needs of our patients and carers at a tertiary cancer centre. METHODS: Experience-based co-design methodology was adapted to include virtual methods. Staff members (n = 12) and patients (n = 11) who had delivered or received therapies services at our UK cancer centre since March 2020 were recruited to take part in one-to-one virtual interviews. Patient interviews were video recorded, analysed and edited to a 30-min “trigger film”. Patient and staff virtual events were undertaken thereafter. A joint virtual patient and staff event occurred. Staff and patients watched the trigger film and as partners, agreed areas for change and developed groups for service co-design. RESULTS: Positive aspects regarding telemedicine provision were highlighted including reduced financial and time burden on patients, and increased flexibility for both staff and patients. The key concerns included digital exclusion, safety, communication and patient choice. Four co-design groups have been established to enact changes in these priority areas. CONCLUSION: Using a participatory design approach, we have worked in partnership with patients and staff to ensure the safe, acceptable and effective delivery of rehabilitation services with integrated telemedicine. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8458557/ /pubmed/34554280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06552-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Brady, Grainne
Ashforth, Kate
Cowan-Dickie, Siobhan
Dewhurst, Sarah
Harris, Natalie
Monteiro, Alline
Sandsund, Catherine
Roe, Justin
An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title_full An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title_fullStr An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title_short An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
title_sort evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06552-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bradygrainne anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT ashforthkate anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT cowandickiesiobhan anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT dewhurstsarah anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT harrisnatalie anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT monteiroalline anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT sandsundcatherine anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT roejustin anevaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT bradygrainne evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT ashforthkate evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT cowandickiesiobhan evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT dewhurstsarah evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT harrisnatalie evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT monteiroalline evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT sandsundcatherine evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach
AT roejustin evaluationoftheprovisionofoncologyrehabilitationservicesviatelemedicineusingaparticipatorydesignapproach