Cargando…

Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over conventional laparoscopy. However, population-based comparative studies for low anterior resection are limited. This article aimed to compare peri-operative results of robot-assisted low anterior resection (RALAR) and laparo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuyama, T, Endo, H, Yamamoto, H, Takemasa, I, Uehara, K, Hanai, T, Miyata, H, Kimura, T, Hasegawa, H, Kakeji, Y, Inomata, M, Kitagawa, Y, Kinugasa, Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083
_version_ 1784571336386936832
author Matsuyama, T
Endo, H
Yamamoto, H
Takemasa, I
Uehara, K
Hanai, T
Miyata, H
Kimura, T
Hasegawa, H
Kakeji, Y
Inomata, M
Kitagawa, Y
Kinugasa, Y
author_facet Matsuyama, T
Endo, H
Yamamoto, H
Takemasa, I
Uehara, K
Hanai, T
Miyata, H
Kimura, T
Hasegawa, H
Kakeji, Y
Inomata, M
Kitagawa, Y
Kinugasa, Y
author_sort Matsuyama, T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over conventional laparoscopy. However, population-based comparative studies for low anterior resection are limited. This article aimed to compare peri-operative results of robot-assisted low anterior resection (RALAR) and laparoscopy METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from patients treated with RALAR or conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (CLLAR) between October 2018 and December 2019, as recorded in the Japanese National Clinical Database, a data set registering clinical information, perioperative outcomes, and mortality. Of note, the registry does not include information on the tumour location (centimetres from the anal verge) and diverting stoma creation. Perioperative outcomes, including rate of conversion to open surgery, were compared between RALAR and CLLAR groups. Confounding factors were adjusted for using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of 21 415 patients treated during the study interval, 20 220 were reviewed. Two homogeneous groups of 2843 patients were created by propensity score matching. The conversion rate to open surgery was significantly lower in the RALAR group than in the CLLAR group (0.7 versus 2.0 per cent; P < 0.001). The RALAR group had a longer operating time (median: 352 versus 283 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (15 versus 20 ml; P < 0.001), a lower in-hospital mortality rate (0.1 versus 0.5 per cent; P = 0.007), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median: 13 versus 14 days; P < 0.001) compared with the CLLAR group. The CLLAR group had a lower rate of readmission within 30 days (2.4 versus 3.3 per cent; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: These data highlight the reduced conversion rate, in-hospital mortality rate, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay for rectal cancer surgery in patients treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with laparoscopic low anterior resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84586382021-09-23 Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan Matsuyama, T Endo, H Yamamoto, H Takemasa, I Uehara, K Hanai, T Miyata, H Kimura, T Hasegawa, H Kakeji, Y Inomata, M Kitagawa, Y Kinugasa, Y BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over conventional laparoscopy. However, population-based comparative studies for low anterior resection are limited. This article aimed to compare peri-operative results of robot-assisted low anterior resection (RALAR) and laparoscopy METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from patients treated with RALAR or conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (CLLAR) between October 2018 and December 2019, as recorded in the Japanese National Clinical Database, a data set registering clinical information, perioperative outcomes, and mortality. Of note, the registry does not include information on the tumour location (centimetres from the anal verge) and diverting stoma creation. Perioperative outcomes, including rate of conversion to open surgery, were compared between RALAR and CLLAR groups. Confounding factors were adjusted for using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of 21 415 patients treated during the study interval, 20 220 were reviewed. Two homogeneous groups of 2843 patients were created by propensity score matching. The conversion rate to open surgery was significantly lower in the RALAR group than in the CLLAR group (0.7 versus 2.0 per cent; P < 0.001). The RALAR group had a longer operating time (median: 352 versus 283 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (15 versus 20 ml; P < 0.001), a lower in-hospital mortality rate (0.1 versus 0.5 per cent; P = 0.007), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median: 13 versus 14 days; P < 0.001) compared with the CLLAR group. The CLLAR group had a lower rate of readmission within 30 days (2.4 versus 3.3 per cent; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: These data highlight the reduced conversion rate, in-hospital mortality rate, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay for rectal cancer surgery in patients treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with laparoscopic low anterior resection. Oxford University Press 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8458638/ /pubmed/34553225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsuyama, T
Endo, H
Yamamoto, H
Takemasa, I
Uehara, K
Hanai, T
Miyata, H
Kimura, T
Hasegawa, H
Kakeji, Y
Inomata, M
Kitagawa, Y
Kinugasa, Y
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title_full Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title_fullStr Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title_short Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan
title_sort outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the national clinical database in japan
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34553225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuyamat outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT endoh outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT yamamotoh outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT takemasai outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT ueharak outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT hanait outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT miyatah outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT kimurat outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT hasegawah outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT kakejiy outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT inomatam outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT kitagaway outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan
AT kinugasay outcomesofrobotassistedversusconventionallaparoscopiclowanteriorresectioninpatientswithrectalcancerpropensitymatchedanalysisofthenationalclinicaldatabaseinjapan