Cargando…

Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices

This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and alr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tijdink, Joeri K., Horbach, Serge P.J.M., Nuijten, Michèle B., O’Neill, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646211018916
_version_ 1784571346731139072
author Tijdink, Joeri K.
Horbach, Serge P.J.M.
Nuijten, Michèle B.
O’Neill, Gareth
author_facet Tijdink, Joeri K.
Horbach, Serge P.J.M.
Nuijten, Michèle B.
O’Neill, Gareth
author_sort Tijdink, Joeri K.
collection PubMed
description This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used seven iterative methodological steps (including literature review, ranking, and sorting exercises) to create the proposed research agenda. We identified six main themes that we believe need attention in future research: (1) responsible evaluation of research and researchers, (2) the influence of open science and transparency on RRP, (3) research on responsible mentoring, supervision, and role modeling, (4) the effect of education and training on RRP, (5) checking for reproducibility, and (6) responsible and fair peer review. These themes have in common that they address aspects of research that are mostly on the level of the scientific system, more than on the level of the individual researcher. Some current initiatives are already gathering substantial empirical evidence to start filling these gaps. We believe that with sufficient support from all relevant stakeholders, more progress can be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84586782021-09-24 Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices Tijdink, Joeri K. Horbach, Serge P.J.M. Nuijten, Michèle B. O’Neill, Gareth J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Empirical Research on Research Misconduct and Responsible Conduct of Research This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used seven iterative methodological steps (including literature review, ranking, and sorting exercises) to create the proposed research agenda. We identified six main themes that we believe need attention in future research: (1) responsible evaluation of research and researchers, (2) the influence of open science and transparency on RRP, (3) research on responsible mentoring, supervision, and role modeling, (4) the effect of education and training on RRP, (5) checking for reproducibility, and (6) responsible and fair peer review. These themes have in common that they address aspects of research that are mostly on the level of the scientific system, more than on the level of the individual researcher. Some current initiatives are already gathering substantial empirical evidence to start filling these gaps. We believe that with sufficient support from all relevant stakeholders, more progress can be made. SAGE Publications 2021-05-26 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8458678/ /pubmed/34037490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646211018916 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Empirical Research on Research Misconduct and Responsible Conduct of Research
Tijdink, Joeri K.
Horbach, Serge P.J.M.
Nuijten, Michèle B.
O’Neill, Gareth
Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title_full Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title_fullStr Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title_short Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
title_sort towards a research agenda for promoting responsible research practices
topic Empirical Research on Research Misconduct and Responsible Conduct of Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646211018916
work_keys_str_mv AT tijdinkjoerik towardsaresearchagendaforpromotingresponsibleresearchpractices
AT horbachsergepjm towardsaresearchagendaforpromotingresponsibleresearchpractices
AT nuijtenmicheleb towardsaresearchagendaforpromotingresponsibleresearchpractices
AT oneillgareth towardsaresearchagendaforpromotingresponsibleresearchpractices