Cargando…

Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)

INTRODUCTION: We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: Patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veronesi, Giulia, Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed, Muriana, Piergiorgio, Lembo, Rosalba, Bottoni, Edoardo, Perroni, Gianluca, Testori, Alberto, Dieci, Elisa, Bakhos, Charles T., Car, Shamus, Luzzi, Luca, Alloisio, Marco, Novellis, Pierluigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.726408
_version_ 1784571370181492736
author Veronesi, Giulia
Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed
Muriana, Piergiorgio
Lembo, Rosalba
Bottoni, Edoardo
Perroni, Gianluca
Testori, Alberto
Dieci, Elisa
Bakhos, Charles T.
Car, Shamus
Luzzi, Luca
Alloisio, Marco
Novellis, Pierluigi
author_facet Veronesi, Giulia
Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed
Muriana, Piergiorgio
Lembo, Rosalba
Bottoni, Edoardo
Perroni, Gianluca
Testori, Alberto
Dieci, Elisa
Bakhos, Charles T.
Car, Shamus
Luzzi, Luca
Alloisio, Marco
Novellis, Pierluigi
author_sort Veronesi, Giulia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1–T2, N0–N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection arms. The primary objective was the incidence of adverse events including complications and conversion to thoracotomy. The secondary objectives included extent of lymph node (LN) dissection and other indicators. RESULTS: This trial was closed at 83 cases as the probability of concluding in favor of the robot arm for the primary outcome was null according to the observed trend. In this study, we report the results of the analysis conducted on the patients enrolled until trial suspension. Thirty-nine cases were randomized in the VATS arm and 38 in the robotic arm. Six patients were excluded from analysis. Despite finding no difference between the two arms in perioperative complications, conversions, duration of surgery, or duration of postoperative stay, a significantly greater degree of LN assessment by the robotic technique was observed in regards to the median number of sampled LN stations [6, interquartile range (IQR) 4–6 vs. 4, IQR 3–5; p = 0.0002], hilar LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 4, IQR 2–7; p = 0.0003), and mediastinal LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 5, IQR 3–7; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial demonstrated that RATS was not superior to VATS considering the perioperative outcome for early-stage NSCLC, but the robotic approach allowed an improvement of LN dissection. Further studies are suggested to validate the results of this trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02804893.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84587702021-09-24 Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study) Veronesi, Giulia Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed Muriana, Piergiorgio Lembo, Rosalba Bottoni, Edoardo Perroni, Gianluca Testori, Alberto Dieci, Elisa Bakhos, Charles T. Car, Shamus Luzzi, Luca Alloisio, Marco Novellis, Pierluigi Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1–T2, N0–N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection arms. The primary objective was the incidence of adverse events including complications and conversion to thoracotomy. The secondary objectives included extent of lymph node (LN) dissection and other indicators. RESULTS: This trial was closed at 83 cases as the probability of concluding in favor of the robot arm for the primary outcome was null according to the observed trend. In this study, we report the results of the analysis conducted on the patients enrolled until trial suspension. Thirty-nine cases were randomized in the VATS arm and 38 in the robotic arm. Six patients were excluded from analysis. Despite finding no difference between the two arms in perioperative complications, conversions, duration of surgery, or duration of postoperative stay, a significantly greater degree of LN assessment by the robotic technique was observed in regards to the median number of sampled LN stations [6, interquartile range (IQR) 4–6 vs. 4, IQR 3–5; p = 0.0002], hilar LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 4, IQR 2–7; p = 0.0003), and mediastinal LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 5, IQR 3–7; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial demonstrated that RATS was not superior to VATS considering the perioperative outcome for early-stage NSCLC, but the robotic approach allowed an improvement of LN dissection. Further studies are suggested to validate the results of this trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02804893. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8458770/ /pubmed/34568057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.726408 Text en Copyright © 2021 Veronesi, Abbas, Muriana, Lembo, Bottoni, Perroni, Testori, Dieci, Bakhos, Car, Luzzi, Alloisio and Novellis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Veronesi, Giulia
Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed
Muriana, Piergiorgio
Lembo, Rosalba
Bottoni, Edoardo
Perroni, Gianluca
Testori, Alberto
Dieci, Elisa
Bakhos, Charles T.
Car, Shamus
Luzzi, Luca
Alloisio, Marco
Novellis, Pierluigi
Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title_full Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title_fullStr Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title_short Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)
title_sort perioperative outcome of robotic approach versus manual videothoracoscopic major resection in patients affected by early lung cancer: results of a randomized multicentric study (roman study)
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.726408
work_keys_str_mv AT veronesigiulia perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT abbasabbaselsayed perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT murianapiergiorgio perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT lemborosalba perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT bottoniedoardo perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT perronigianluca perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT testorialberto perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT diecielisa perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT bakhoscharlest perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT carshamus perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT luzziluca perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT alloisiomarco perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy
AT novellispierluigi perioperativeoutcomeofroboticapproachversusmanualvideothoracoscopicmajorresectioninpatientsaffectedbyearlylungcancerresultsofarandomizedmulticentricstudyromanstudy