Cargando…

Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Women do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to the same degree as men; women-focused CR may address this. This systematic review investigated the: (1) nature, (2) availability, as well as (3a) utilization of, and (b) satisfaction with women-focused CR. METHODS: Medline, Pubme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamataz, Taslima, Ghisi, Gabriela L. M., Pakosh, Maureen, Grace, Sherry L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02267-0
_version_ 1784571375040593920
author Mamataz, Taslima
Ghisi, Gabriela L. M.
Pakosh, Maureen
Grace, Sherry L.
author_facet Mamataz, Taslima
Ghisi, Gabriela L. M.
Pakosh, Maureen
Grace, Sherry L.
author_sort Mamataz, Taslima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to the same degree as men; women-focused CR may address this. This systematic review investigated the: (1) nature, (2) availability, as well as (3a) utilization of, and (b) satisfaction with women-focused CR. METHODS: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Emcare were searched for articles from inception to May 2020. Primary studies of any design were included. Adult females with any cardiac diseases, participating in women-focused CR (i.e., program or sessions included ≥ 50% females, or was 1-1 and tailored to women’s needs) were considered. Two authors rated citations for inclusion. One extracted data, including study quality rated as per the Mixed-Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT), which was checked independently by a second author. Results were analyzed in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. RESULTS: 3498 unique citations were identified, with 28 studies (53 papers) included (3697 women; ≥ 10 countries). Globally, women-focused CR is offered by 40.9% of countries that have CR, with 32.1% of programs in those countries offering it. Thirteen (46.4%) studies offered women-focused sessions (vs. full program), 17 (60.7%) were women-only, and 11 (39.3%) had gender-tailoring. Five (17.9%) programs offered alternate forms of exercise, and 17 (60.7%) focused on psychosocial aspects. With regard to utilization, women-focused CR cannot be offered as frequently, so could be less accessible. Adherence may be greater with gender-tailored CR, and completion effects are not known. Satisfaction was assessed in 1 trial, and results were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Women-focused CR involves tailoring of content, mode and/or sex composition. Availability is limited. Effects on utilization require further study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02267-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84587882021-09-23 Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review Mamataz, Taslima Ghisi, Gabriela L. M. Pakosh, Maureen Grace, Sherry L. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Women do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to the same degree as men; women-focused CR may address this. This systematic review investigated the: (1) nature, (2) availability, as well as (3a) utilization of, and (b) satisfaction with women-focused CR. METHODS: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Emcare were searched for articles from inception to May 2020. Primary studies of any design were included. Adult females with any cardiac diseases, participating in women-focused CR (i.e., program or sessions included ≥ 50% females, or was 1-1 and tailored to women’s needs) were considered. Two authors rated citations for inclusion. One extracted data, including study quality rated as per the Mixed-Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT), which was checked independently by a second author. Results were analyzed in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. RESULTS: 3498 unique citations were identified, with 28 studies (53 papers) included (3697 women; ≥ 10 countries). Globally, women-focused CR is offered by 40.9% of countries that have CR, with 32.1% of programs in those countries offering it. Thirteen (46.4%) studies offered women-focused sessions (vs. full program), 17 (60.7%) were women-only, and 11 (39.3%) had gender-tailoring. Five (17.9%) programs offered alternate forms of exercise, and 17 (60.7%) focused on psychosocial aspects. With regard to utilization, women-focused CR cannot be offered as frequently, so could be less accessible. Adherence may be greater with gender-tailored CR, and completion effects are not known. Satisfaction was assessed in 1 trial, and results were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Women-focused CR involves tailoring of content, mode and/or sex composition. Availability is limited. Effects on utilization require further study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02267-0. BioMed Central 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8458788/ /pubmed/34556036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02267-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mamataz, Taslima
Ghisi, Gabriela L. M.
Pakosh, Maureen
Grace, Sherry L.
Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_full Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_short Nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_sort nature, availability, and utilization of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02267-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mamataztaslima natureavailabilityandutilizationofwomenfocusedcardiacrehabilitationasystematicreview
AT ghisigabrielalm natureavailabilityandutilizationofwomenfocusedcardiacrehabilitationasystematicreview
AT pakoshmaureen natureavailabilityandutilizationofwomenfocusedcardiacrehabilitationasystematicreview
AT gracesherryl natureavailabilityandutilizationofwomenfocusedcardiacrehabilitationasystematicreview