Cargando…

Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies

Children frequently apply a novel label to a novel object, a behavior known as the mutual exclusivity bias (MEB). This study examined how MEB affects children’s retention for word mappings. In Experiment 1, preschoolers (N = 39; M(age) = 46.62 months) and adults (N = 24; M(age) = 21.63 years) comple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bredemann, Catherine A., Vlach, Haley A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686554
_version_ 1784571385012551680
author Bredemann, Catherine A.
Vlach, Haley A.
author_facet Bredemann, Catherine A.
Vlach, Haley A.
author_sort Bredemann, Catherine A.
collection PubMed
description Children frequently apply a novel label to a novel object, a behavior known as the mutual exclusivity bias (MEB). This study examined how MEB affects children’s retention for word mappings. In Experiment 1, preschoolers (N = 39; M(age) = 46.62 months) and adults (N = 24; M(age) = 21.63 years) completed an immediate word mapping task and a delayed retention test. Both samples used MEB during referent selection, but neither group displayed higher retention for words mapped via MEB than words mapped via other referent selection strategies at test. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 with preschoolers (N = 85; M(age) = 47.78 months) and provided evidence against the possibility that interference from multiple words contributed to children’s faster forgetting of word mappings when using MEB. Experiment 3 presented children (N = 30; M(age) = 51.13 months) with an abbreviated version of the task, providing evidence against the alternative hypothesis that cognitive load during learning caused the forgetting observed in Experiments 1 and 2. Taken together, these experiments suggest that MEB supports initial word mapping but may not provide an advantage for long-term retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84588262021-09-24 Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies Bredemann, Catherine A. Vlach, Haley A. Front Psychol Psychology Children frequently apply a novel label to a novel object, a behavior known as the mutual exclusivity bias (MEB). This study examined how MEB affects children’s retention for word mappings. In Experiment 1, preschoolers (N = 39; M(age) = 46.62 months) and adults (N = 24; M(age) = 21.63 years) completed an immediate word mapping task and a delayed retention test. Both samples used MEB during referent selection, but neither group displayed higher retention for words mapped via MEB than words mapped via other referent selection strategies at test. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 with preschoolers (N = 85; M(age) = 47.78 months) and provided evidence against the possibility that interference from multiple words contributed to children’s faster forgetting of word mappings when using MEB. Experiment 3 presented children (N = 30; M(age) = 51.13 months) with an abbreviated version of the task, providing evidence against the alternative hypothesis that cognitive load during learning caused the forgetting observed in Experiments 1 and 2. Taken together, these experiments suggest that MEB supports initial word mapping but may not provide an advantage for long-term retention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8458826/ /pubmed/34566766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686554 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bredemann and Vlach. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bredemann, Catherine A.
Vlach, Haley A.
Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title_full Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title_fullStr Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title_short Where’s the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children’s Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies
title_sort where’s the advantage? mutual exclusivity promotes children’s initial mapping, but not long-term memory, for words compared to other strategies
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686554
work_keys_str_mv AT bredemanncatherinea wherestheadvantagemutualexclusivitypromoteschildrensinitialmappingbutnotlongtermmemoryforwordscomparedtootherstrategies
AT vlachhaleya wherestheadvantagemutualexclusivitypromoteschildrensinitialmappingbutnotlongtermmemoryforwordscomparedtootherstrategies