Cargando…

A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection

Background: The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are widely used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection, while it may cause severe liver damage. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sustained virologic response at pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Hsuan-Yu, Chen, Chung-Yu, Liao, Yi-Hsiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.640317
_version_ 1784571395649306624
author Hung, Hsuan-Yu
Chen, Chung-Yu
Liao, Yi-Hsiang
author_facet Hung, Hsuan-Yu
Chen, Chung-Yu
Liao, Yi-Hsiang
author_sort Hung, Hsuan-Yu
collection PubMed
description Background: The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are widely used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection, while it may cause severe liver damage. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and recurrence rates in HCV GT 1 infection. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with HCV GT 1 infection, who had received intervention and treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) ± ribavirin (RBV) versus ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) + dasabuvir ± RBV (as control group) for 12 or 24 weeks at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between April 2016 and August 2018. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of DILI via Poisson regression, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens expressed as a percentage. Results: The study included 149 patients in the control group and 105 patients in the intervention group of which 99.33 and 98.1% patients, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the control group, one patient experienced relapse, whereas in the intervention group, two patients relapsed. Furthermore, in the control group, a total of nine patients developed DILI as determined during follow-up care. Of these patients, three were 55–84 years old. In the intervention group, six patients developed DILI. The IRR of DILI caused by EBR/GZR treatment was 2.84 times higher than that caused by the OBV/PTV/r treatment regimen. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the studied DAA regimens regarding the incidence of DILI and effectiveness during the treatment. DILI occurrence during therapy did not affect the cure rate of medication. The present study results can provide reference data for drug selection among patients with HCV. Trial registration: The study was approved by DMF-CYCH (CYCH IRB No: 2018067).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84588782021-09-24 A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection Hung, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Chung-Yu Liao, Yi-Hsiang Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are widely used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection, while it may cause severe liver damage. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and recurrence rates in HCV GT 1 infection. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with HCV GT 1 infection, who had received intervention and treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) ± ribavirin (RBV) versus ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) + dasabuvir ± RBV (as control group) for 12 or 24 weeks at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between April 2016 and August 2018. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of DILI via Poisson regression, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens expressed as a percentage. Results: The study included 149 patients in the control group and 105 patients in the intervention group of which 99.33 and 98.1% patients, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the control group, one patient experienced relapse, whereas in the intervention group, two patients relapsed. Furthermore, in the control group, a total of nine patients developed DILI as determined during follow-up care. Of these patients, three were 55–84 years old. In the intervention group, six patients developed DILI. The IRR of DILI caused by EBR/GZR treatment was 2.84 times higher than that caused by the OBV/PTV/r treatment regimen. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the studied DAA regimens regarding the incidence of DILI and effectiveness during the treatment. DILI occurrence during therapy did not affect the cure rate of medication. The present study results can provide reference data for drug selection among patients with HCV. Trial registration: The study was approved by DMF-CYCH (CYCH IRB No: 2018067). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8458878/ /pubmed/34566631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.640317 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hung, Chen and Liao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Hung, Hsuan-Yu
Chen, Chung-Yu
Liao, Yi-Hsiang
A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title_full A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title_fullStr A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title_short A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
title_sort retrospective cohort study: safety and effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir ± ribavirin compared with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir ± ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis c genotype 1 infection
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.640317
work_keys_str_mv AT hunghsuanyu aretrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection
AT chenchungyu aretrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection
AT liaoyihsiang aretrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection
AT hunghsuanyu retrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection
AT chenchungyu retrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection
AT liaoyihsiang retrospectivecohortstudysafetyandeffectivenessofelbasvirgrazoprevirribavirincomparedwithombitasvirparitaprevirritonavirdasabuvirribavirininpatientswithchronichepatitiscgenotype1infection