Cargando…

Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities

Background: The aim of the study was to identify, interpret, and compare the current perspectives of regulatory agencies in six member countries of BRICS-TM (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, and Mexico) on the different criteria used for biosimilar development and marketing author...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahalkar, Hasumati, Sheppard, Alan, Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima, Dasgupta, Chitralekha, Perez-Tapia, Sonia Mayra, Lopez-Morales, Carlos A., Salek, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.726660
_version_ 1784571417845563392
author Rahalkar, Hasumati
Sheppard, Alan
Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima
Dasgupta, Chitralekha
Perez-Tapia, Sonia Mayra
Lopez-Morales, Carlos A.
Salek, Sam
author_facet Rahalkar, Hasumati
Sheppard, Alan
Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima
Dasgupta, Chitralekha
Perez-Tapia, Sonia Mayra
Lopez-Morales, Carlos A.
Salek, Sam
author_sort Rahalkar, Hasumati
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of the study was to identify, interpret, and compare the current perspectives of regulatory agencies in six member countries of BRICS-TM (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, and Mexico) on the different criteria used for biosimilar development and marketing authorisation process. Methods: A semi-quantitative questionnaire was developed covering the organisation of agency, biosimilar development criteria and marketing authorisation process and sent to seven regulatory agencies covering the BRICS-TM countries. All data was kept anonymous and confidential. Data processing and analysis was carried out; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content analysis was employed to generate themes for qualitative data. Results: Out of the seven regulatory agencies included in the study, six representatives provided the responses. The perspectives of these six regulatory agencies varied on a number of aspects relating to the review criteria for biosimilar development and licencing process. The most prevalent model for data assessment is the “full review” of a marketing authorisation application. There is lack of a standard approach across the agencies on sourcing of the reference biological product, in vivo toxicity studies and confirmatory clinical studies. Most agencies restrict interaction with biosimilar developers and any scientific advice is non-binding. The marketing authorisation approval depends on scientific assessment of the dossier, sample analysis and GMP certification. The agencies do not issue any public assessment report specifying the summary basis of biosimilar approval. Conclusion: Regulatory agencies across the six emerging economies are steadily improving the regulatory mechanism in the area of biosimilars. However, there remains scope for increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes by encouraging open and transparent interaction with developers, adopting a flexible approach toward accepting advanced analytical data in lieu of clinical studies and enhancing regulatory reliance amongst agencies. This will help to simplify the new biosimilar development programmes and make them more cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8458962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84589622021-09-24 Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities Rahalkar, Hasumati Sheppard, Alan Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima Dasgupta, Chitralekha Perez-Tapia, Sonia Mayra Lopez-Morales, Carlos A. Salek, Sam Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: The aim of the study was to identify, interpret, and compare the current perspectives of regulatory agencies in six member countries of BRICS-TM (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, and Mexico) on the different criteria used for biosimilar development and marketing authorisation process. Methods: A semi-quantitative questionnaire was developed covering the organisation of agency, biosimilar development criteria and marketing authorisation process and sent to seven regulatory agencies covering the BRICS-TM countries. All data was kept anonymous and confidential. Data processing and analysis was carried out; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content analysis was employed to generate themes for qualitative data. Results: Out of the seven regulatory agencies included in the study, six representatives provided the responses. The perspectives of these six regulatory agencies varied on a number of aspects relating to the review criteria for biosimilar development and licencing process. The most prevalent model for data assessment is the “full review” of a marketing authorisation application. There is lack of a standard approach across the agencies on sourcing of the reference biological product, in vivo toxicity studies and confirmatory clinical studies. Most agencies restrict interaction with biosimilar developers and any scientific advice is non-binding. The marketing authorisation approval depends on scientific assessment of the dossier, sample analysis and GMP certification. The agencies do not issue any public assessment report specifying the summary basis of biosimilar approval. Conclusion: Regulatory agencies across the six emerging economies are steadily improving the regulatory mechanism in the area of biosimilars. However, there remains scope for increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes by encouraging open and transparent interaction with developers, adopting a flexible approach toward accepting advanced analytical data in lieu of clinical studies and enhancing regulatory reliance amongst agencies. This will help to simplify the new biosimilar development programmes and make them more cost-effective. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8458962/ /pubmed/34568384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.726660 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rahalkar, Sheppard, Santos, Dasgupta, Perez-Tapia, Lopez-Morales and Salek. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Rahalkar, Hasumati
Sheppard, Alan
Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima
Dasgupta, Chitralekha
Perez-Tapia, Sonia Mayra
Lopez-Morales, Carlos A.
Salek, Sam
Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title_full Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title_fullStr Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title_short Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities
title_sort current regulatory requirements for biosimilars in six member countries of brics-tm: challenges and opportunities
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8458962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.726660
work_keys_str_mv AT rahalkarhasumati currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT sheppardalan currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT santosgustavomendeslima currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT dasguptachitralekha currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT pereztapiasoniamayra currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT lopezmoralescarlosa currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities
AT saleksam currentregulatoryrequirementsforbiosimilarsinsixmembercountriesofbricstmchallengesandopportunities