Cargando…

Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars

Plant tissue culture technology offers a solution for meeting the increasing commercial demand on economically important plants such as rice, a widespread dietary staple. However, significant genotype-specific morphogenetic responses constitute a considerable on rice regeneration in plant biotechnol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed, Gehad M., Amer, Ahmed M., Osman, Neama H., Sedikc, Mohammed Z., Hussein, Mona H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.003
_version_ 1784571443879608320
author Mohamed, Gehad M.
Amer, Ahmed M.
Osman, Neama H.
Sedikc, Mohammed Z.
Hussein, Mona H.
author_facet Mohamed, Gehad M.
Amer, Ahmed M.
Osman, Neama H.
Sedikc, Mohammed Z.
Hussein, Mona H.
author_sort Mohamed, Gehad M.
collection PubMed
description Plant tissue culture technology offers a solution for meeting the increasing commercial demand on economically important plants such as rice, a widespread dietary staple. However, significant genotype-specific morphogenetic responses constitute a considerable on rice regeneration in plant biotechnology contexts. Aside from genotype dependency, the components of the nutrient media including gelling agents have an important impact on regeneration efficiency. The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178. Media solidified with varying concentrations of a variety of gelling agents (agar, bacto agar, gelrite and phytagel) were tested for their impact on the frequency of callus induction, shoot regeneration and rooting. The results indicated gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel) was superior to agar products (agar and bacto agar) for callus induction. By contrast, no significant differences were found between different gelling agents for shoot regeneration. Gellan gum and media solidified with bacto agar were found to lead to significantly higher root regeneration than agar. The Sakha104 cultivar showed better responses than Giza 178 for callus induction and similar performance to the Giza 178 cultivar for root regeneration irrespective of the gelling agent. This work provides insights into the impact of different gelling agents on the morphogenetic response of two rice cultivars and can be used to help maximize the frequency of rice regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8459084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84590842021-09-28 Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars Mohamed, Gehad M. Amer, Ahmed M. Osman, Neama H. Sedikc, Mohammed Z. Hussein, Mona H. Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Plant tissue culture technology offers a solution for meeting the increasing commercial demand on economically important plants such as rice, a widespread dietary staple. However, significant genotype-specific morphogenetic responses constitute a considerable on rice regeneration in plant biotechnology contexts. Aside from genotype dependency, the components of the nutrient media including gelling agents have an important impact on regeneration efficiency. The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178. Media solidified with varying concentrations of a variety of gelling agents (agar, bacto agar, gelrite and phytagel) were tested for their impact on the frequency of callus induction, shoot regeneration and rooting. The results indicated gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel) was superior to agar products (agar and bacto agar) for callus induction. By contrast, no significant differences were found between different gelling agents for shoot regeneration. Gellan gum and media solidified with bacto agar were found to lead to significantly higher root regeneration than agar. The Sakha104 cultivar showed better responses than Giza 178 for callus induction and similar performance to the Giza 178 cultivar for root regeneration irrespective of the gelling agent. This work provides insights into the impact of different gelling agents on the morphogenetic response of two rice cultivars and can be used to help maximize the frequency of rice regeneration. Elsevier 2021-10 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8459084/ /pubmed/34588885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohamed, Gehad M.
Amer, Ahmed M.
Osman, Neama H.
Sedikc, Mohammed Z.
Hussein, Mona H.
Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title_full Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title_fullStr Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title_short Effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
title_sort effects of different gelling agents on the different stages of rice regeneration in two rice cultivars
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.003
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedgehadm effectsofdifferentgellingagentsonthedifferentstagesofriceregenerationintworicecultivars
AT amerahmedm effectsofdifferentgellingagentsonthedifferentstagesofriceregenerationintworicecultivars
AT osmanneamah effectsofdifferentgellingagentsonthedifferentstagesofriceregenerationintworicecultivars
AT sedikcmohammedz effectsofdifferentgellingagentsonthedifferentstagesofriceregenerationintworicecultivars
AT husseinmonah effectsofdifferentgellingagentsonthedifferentstagesofriceregenerationintworicecultivars